West C M
Mol Cell Biochem. 1986 Nov-Dec;72(1-2):3-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00230632.
Carbohydrate has been removed from a number of glycoproteins without major effect on the structure or enzyme activity of the protein. Thus carbohydrate has been suggested to underly a non-primary function for proteins, such as in relatively non-specific interactions with other carbohydrates or macromolecules, stabilization of protein conformation, or protection from proteolysis. This non-specific concept is consistent with both the general similarity in carbohydrate structure on very diverse glycoproteins and the frequent structural microheterogeneity of carbohydrate chains at given sites. The concept is supported in a general sense by the viability of cells whose glycosylation processes have been globally disrupted by mutation or pharmacological inhibitors. In contrast to the above observations, other studies have revealed the existence of specific, selective receptors for discrete oligosaccharide structures on glycoproteins which seem to be important for compartmentalization of the glycoprotein, or the positioning of cells on which the glycoprotein is concentrated. Sometimes multivalency in the carbohydrate-receptor interaction is crucial. There are additional possible roles for carbohydrate in the transduction of information upon binding to a receptor. The possibility of specific roles for carbohydrate is supported by the existence of numerous unique carbohydrate structures, many of which have been detected as glycoantigens by monoclonal antibodies, with unique distributions in developing and differentiated cells. This article attempts to summarize and rationalize the contradictory results. It appears that in general carbohydrate does in fact underlie only roles secondary to a protein's primary function. These secondary roles are simple non-specific ones of protection and stabilization, but often also satisfy the more sophisticated needs of spatial position control and compartmentalization in multicellular eukaryotic organisms. It is suggested that there are advantages, evolutionarily speaking, for the shared use of carbohydrate for non-specific roles and for specific roles primarily as luxury functions to be executed during the processes of cell differentiation and morphogenesis.
许多糖蛋白中的碳水化合物已被去除,而对蛋白质的结构或酶活性没有重大影响。因此,有人提出碳水化合物在蛋白质中发挥的是非主要功能,例如在与其他碳水化合物或大分子的相对非特异性相互作用、蛋白质构象的稳定或防止蛋白质水解方面。这一非特异性概念与多种糖蛋白上碳水化合物结构的普遍相似性以及特定位点碳水化合物链频繁出现的结构微异质性均相符。从总体上看,细胞在糖基化过程因突变或药物抑制剂而被全面破坏的情况下仍具有生存能力,这一概念得到了支持。与上述观察结果相反,其他研究揭示了糖蛋白上离散寡糖结构存在特异性、选择性受体,这些受体似乎对糖蛋白的区室化或糖蛋白集中分布的细胞定位很重要。有时碳水化合物与受体相互作用中的多价性至关重要。碳水化合物在与受体结合时传递信息方面还可能有其他作用。碳水化合物存在众多独特结构,其中许多已被单克隆抗体检测为糖抗原,并在发育和分化细胞中具有独特分布,这支持了碳水化合物具有特定作用的可能性。本文试图总结并合理解释这些相互矛盾的结果。看来一般而言,碳水化合物实际上确实仅在蛋白质主要功能的次要作用中起作用。这些次要作用是简单的非特异性保护和稳定作用,但通常也满足多细胞真核生物中空间位置控制和区室化等更复杂的需求。有人认为,从进化角度来看,碳水化合物用于非特异性作用以及主要作为细胞分化和形态发生过程中执行的奢侈功能的特定作用具有优势。