Suppr超能文献

员工对轮班安排和客观测量的工作时间特征的控制:基于注册和调查数据的横断面分析。

Employee control over scheduling of shifts and objectively measured working hour characteristics: a cross-sectional analysis of linked register and survey data.

机构信息

a Work Ability and Working Careers , Finnish Institute of Occupational Health , Helsinki , Finland.

b Department of Psychology , University of Turku , Turku , Finland.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2019 Jan;36(1):85-95. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1520240. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

Abstract

We aimed to study the association of perceived control over scheduling of shifts with objectively measured working hour characteristics in shift workers. The participants were 5128 hospital employees (91% women, 85% nursing personnel, average age 43 years) in period-based work (114:45h/3 weeks) from the 2015 Finnish Public Sector study. Survey responses to a measure of control over scheduling of shifts were linked to payroll data on working hour characteristics during the 91 days preceding the survey. We used multinomial logistic regression to assess differences in dichotomized proportion of working hour characteristics (being full-time worker, number of work shifts, long work weeks (>40h and >48h/week), long work shifts (>12-h), evening and night shifts, quick returns (<11h shift interval), single days off, weekend work, >4 consecutive work shifts, and variability of shift length with cut points at 10% or 25% between employees with high, intermediate, or low control over scheduling of shifts. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, full-/part-time work (where applicable), duration of shift work experience, perceived work ability, children < 18 years in the household, and overall stressfulness of the life situation. Differences between age groups, men and women, and levels of work ability were examined using interaction terms. In adjusted analyses, the proportion of full-time workers was lower among employees with intermediate control over scheduling of shifts compared to those with high control (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-0.98). High proportion (>25%) of weekend work was lower among employees with low control over scheduling of shifts compared to high control (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.93). High proportion (>25%) of having >4 consecutive work shifts was associated with lower control over scheduling of shifts (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13-1.62). Variability of shift length was lower among employees with intermediate and low control over scheduling of shifts compared to those with high control (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.93; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.75, respectively). No association was observed between the level of control over scheduling of shifts and high proportion of long work weeks (>25% of >40h weeks and >10% of >48h weeks), long work shifts (>25%), quick returns (>25%), single days off (>25%), and evening or night shifts (>10%) in the whole sample. In subgroup analyses, women with low control over scheduling shifts had lower odds ratio (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91) and men had higher odds ratio (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.26-6.98) for large proportion of >12-h shifts. In conclusion, the employees with high control over scheduling of shifts had slightly more often unsocial working hour characteristics than those with intermediate or low control over scheduling of shifts. The findings, however, suggest that good work time control in shift work can be possible without compromising shift ergonomics.

摘要

我们旨在研究轮班工人对轮班安排的感知控制与客观测量的工作时间特征之间的关联。参与者是来自 2015 年芬兰公共部门研究的 5128 名医院员工(91%为女性,85%为护理人员,平均年龄 43 岁),他们实行基于时段的工作制度(114:45h/3 周)。对轮班安排控制程度的测量应答与调查前 91 天的工作时间特征的工资单数据相关联。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估工作时间特征的二分比例(全职工作者、轮班次数、长工作周(>40h 和>48h/周)、长工作班次(>12h)、早晚班和夜班、短班次间隔(<11h)、单日休息、周末工作、>4 个连续轮班和班次长度变化的差异,这些差异在高、中、低轮班安排控制程度的员工中以 10%或 25%为界。分析调整了年龄、性别、教育程度、全职/兼职工作(适用时)、轮班工作经验持续时间、工作能力感知、18 岁以下子女在家庭中、以及生活状况的整体压力。使用交互项检查了不同年龄组、男性和女性以及工作能力水平之间的差异。在调整分析中,与高控制相比,具有中等控制程度的轮班安排的全职工作者比例较低(OR 0.78,95%CI 0.61-0.98)。与高控制相比,低控制程度的轮班安排中周末工作比例较高(OR 0.75,95%CI 0.61-0.93)。与高控制相比,具有较高(>25%)的连续轮班工作比例与较低的轮班安排控制程度相关(OR 1.35,95%CI 1.13-1.62)。与高控制相比,具有中等和低轮班安排控制程度的员工的班次长度变化较小(OR 0.78,95%CI 0.66-0.93;OR 0.62,95%CI 0.51-0.75)。在整个样本中,轮班安排控制程度与长工作周(>25%的>40h 周和>10%的>48h 周)、长工作班次(>25%)、短班次间隔(>25%)、单日休息(>25%)和早晚班或夜班(>10%)的高比例之间没有关联。在亚组分析中,低轮班安排控制的女性的比值比(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.37-0.91)较低,而男性的比值比(OR 2.97,95%CI 1.26-6.98)较高,这表明女性的比值比(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.37-0.91)较大。总之,与中等或低轮班安排控制相比,具有高轮班安排控制的员工具有略微更多的非社交工作时间特征。然而,这些发现表明,在不影响轮班工作人体工程学的情况下,良好的轮班时间控制是可能的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验