Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education, Beijing Normal University, China.
Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, China.
Int J Psychol. 2019 Dec;54(6):712-721. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12533. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
The present research investigated the moderating role of diversity beliefs with the aim of reconciling inconsistent findings regarding the impact of group boundary permeability on attitudes toward outgroup. In Study 1, all variables were measured with self-report scales completed by Chinese participants. In Study 2, diversity beliefs were manipulated by randomly assigning Chinese participants to a high or low diversity belief condition. In Study 3, we replicated the moderating model with American participants. Results of all three studies indicated that diversity beliefs moderated the relationship between group boundary permeability and attitudes toward outgroup. Individuals with high diversity beliefs held more positive attitudes toward the outgroup when the group boundary was permeable (vs. impermeable). Conversely, individuals with low diversity beliefs held more negative attitudes toward the outgroup when the group boundary was permeable (vs. impermeable). These findings suggest that when the inflow of the outgroup members is inevitable, attitudes toward the outgroup may be effectively improved by increasing diversity beliefs.
本研究旨在探讨多样性信念的调节作用,以调和关于群体边界渗透性对群体外态度影响的不一致发现。在研究 1 中,所有变量均通过中国参与者完成的自我报告量表进行测量。在研究 2 中,通过随机分配中国参与者进入高或低多样性信念条件来操纵多样性信念。在研究 3 中,我们使用美国参与者复制了调节模型。这三项研究的结果均表明,多样性信念调节了群体边界渗透性与群体外态度之间的关系。当群体边界可渗透(而不是不可渗透)时,具有高多样性信念的个体对群体外持更积极的态度。相反,当群体边界可渗透(而不是不可渗透)时,具有低多样性信念的个体对群体外持更消极的态度。这些发现表明,当群体外成员的流入不可避免时,通过增加多样性信念可以有效地改善对群体外的态度。