• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间威胁与外群体态度:一项元分析综述

Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review.

作者信息

Riek Blake M, Mania Eric W, Gaertner Samuel L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):336-53. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4.

DOI:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
PMID:17201592
Abstract

This article examines the relationship between intergroup threat and negative outgroup attitudes. We first qualitatively review the intergroup threat literature, describing the shift from competing theories toward more integrated approaches, such as the integrated threat theory (ITT; W. G. Stephan and Stephan, 2000). The types of threats discussed include: realistic threat, symbolic threat, intergroup anxiety, negative stereotypes, group esteem threat, and distinctiveness threat. We then conducted a quantitative meta-analysis examining the relationships between various intergroup threats and outgroup attitudes. The meta-analysis, involving 95 samples, revealed that 5 different threat types had a positive relationship with negative outgroup attitudes. Additionally, outgroup status moderated some of these relationships. Implications and future directions are considered.

摘要

本文探讨了群体间威胁与对外群体的负面态度之间的关系。我们首先对群体间威胁的文献进行了定性综述,描述了从相互竞争的理论向更综合的方法的转变,如整合威胁理论(ITT;W.G.斯蒂芬和斯蒂芬,2000)。所讨论的威胁类型包括:现实威胁、象征威胁、群体间焦虑、负面刻板印象、群体自尊威胁和独特性威胁。然后,我们进行了一项定量元分析,研究各种群体间威胁与对外群体态度之间的关系。这项涉及95个样本的元分析表明,5种不同的威胁类型与对外群体的负面态度呈正相关。此外,外群体地位调节了其中一些关系。我们还考虑了研究的意义和未来方向。

相似文献

1
Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review.群体间威胁与外群体态度:一项元分析综述
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):336-53. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4.
2
A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: the mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self.扩展的群体间接触假设的一项检验:群体间焦虑、感知到的内群体和外群体规范以及外群体在自我中的包含度的中介作用
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;95(4):843-60. doi: 10.1037/a0011434.
3
Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact via social identity complexity.通过社会认同复杂性产生的群体间接触的二次转移效应。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Sep;53(3):443-62. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12045. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
4
High outgroup entitativity can inhibit intergroup retribution.高外群体同质性会抑制群体间的报复行为。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Jun;54(2):341-58. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12078. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
5
Group-based meta-emotion and emotion responses to intergroup threat.基于群体的元情绪和对群体间威胁的情绪反应。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Apr;59(2):494-521. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12364. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
6
The mediating role of outgroup perspective-taking in the relationship of the sense of global social responsibility with negative stereotypes and intergroup anxiety.外群体视角采择在全球社会责任意识与负面刻板印象及群体间焦虑关系中的中介作用。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2023 Sep 28:1-15. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2023.2255842.
7
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.群体间接触理论的元分析检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):751-83. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
8
Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: a meta-analytic integration.群体间的独特性与分化:一项元分析整合
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jun;86(6):862-79. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862.
9
Antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity: intergroup contact, distinctiveness threat, and outgroup attitudes.社会认同复杂性的前因与后果:群体间接触、独特性威胁及外群体态度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Aug;35(8):1085-98. doi: 10.1177/0146167209337037. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
10
Obstacles to intergroup contact: when outgroup partner's anxiety meets perceived ethnic discrimination.群体间接触的障碍:当外群体伙伴的焦虑遇到感知到的种族歧视时。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(4):781-92. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12039. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Leftists and Rightists Differ in Their Cardiovascular Responses to Changing Public Opinion on Migration.左派和右派在面对公众对移民看法改变时的心血管反应存在差异。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Sep;62(9):e70140. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70140.
2
The influence of perceived threat on the motive attribution asymmetry bias for groups in conflict.感知威胁对冲突群体动机归因不对称偏差的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0330927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330927. eCollection 2025.
3
Violence Against Politicians Drives Support for Political Violence Among (Some) Voters: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.
针对政治家的暴力行为促使(部分)选民支持政治暴力:来自一项自然实验的证据。
Public Opin Q. 2025 Apr 22;89(2):310-334. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfaf010. eCollection 2025.
4
Evidence for the Efficacy of Conflict-reducing Practices in Undergraduate Evolution Education in a Randomized Controlled Study.一项随机对照研究中关于本科进化教育中减少冲突做法有效性的证据
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Jun 1;24(2):ar27. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-05-0157.
5
Understanding intergroup violence justification: the role of ethnicity and perceived threat in Israeli society.理解群体间暴力的正当性:种族和感知到的威胁在以色列社会中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 18;16:1508324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508324. eCollection 2025.
6
Perceived inequality and variability in the expression of parochial altruism.狭隘利他主义表达中所感知到的不平等和变异性。
Evol Hum Sci. 2025 Jan 20;7:e3. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.43. eCollection 2025.
7
Attitudes toward artificial intelligence and robots in healthcare in the general population: a qualitative study.普通人群对医疗保健领域人工智能和机器人的态度:一项定性研究。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 27;7:1458685. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1458685. eCollection 2025.
8
Minority Affirmations and the Boundaries of the Nation: Evidence From Québec.少数群体肯定与国家边界:来自魁北克的证据。
Polit Stud (Oxf). 2025 Feb;73(1):6-28. doi: 10.1177/00323217231223400. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
9
Our ways will not change: Future collective continuity increases present prosocial considerations.我们的方式不会改变:未来的集体延续性会增加当下的亲社会考量。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12847. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12847.
10
Understanding Users' Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Applications: A Literature Review.理解用户对人工智能应用的接受度:文献综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 2;14(8):671. doi: 10.3390/bs14080671.