Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Rehabil Psychol. 2019 May;64(2):194-202. doi: 10.1037/rep0000227. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
The aim of this study was twofold: (a) to explore patterns of discrimination in relation to broad-basis categories of disability and (b) to investigate patterns of discrimination between allegations derived from charging parties with sensory impairments versus those with nonsensory impairments. Basis categories included physical, behavioral, neurological, and sensory impairments.
Database mining, descriptive analysis, and Pearson's chi-square analyses were utilized to compare broad-basis categories.
In general, regardless of disability type, individuals experience the highest frequency and proportion of workplace discrimination in the areas of termination and reasonable accommodations. However, there are significant differences in the workplace discrimination experiences of the four broader groups.
Noteworthy differences exist regarding the experience of workplace discrimination among basis categories of disability, especially with respect to sensory impairment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究旨在双重探索与广泛残疾类别相关的歧视模式：（a）探索歧视模式，（b）调查源于感觉障碍指控方与非感觉障碍指控方的歧视模式。基础类别包括身体、行为、神经和感觉障碍。
利用数据库挖掘、描述性分析和 Pearson 的卡方分析比较广泛的类别。
一般来说，无论残疾类型如何，个人在终止和合理住宿方面经历了最高频率和比例的工作场所歧视。然而，在这四个更广泛的群体中，工作场所歧视的经历存在显著差异。
在残疾基础类别的工作场所歧视经历方面存在显著差异，特别是在感觉障碍方面。（PsycINFO 数据库记录（c）2019 APA，保留所有权利）。
