Olofsson Jonas K, Syrjänen Elmeri, Ekström Ingrid, Larsson Maria, Wiens Stefan
Gosta Ekman Laboratory.
Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;132(6):587-594. doi: 10.1037/bne0000266. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
In psychological experiments, behavioral speed varies across trials, and this variation is often associated with corresponding fluctuations in cortical activity. Little is known about such cortical variations in semantic priming tasks where target words are matched with preceding sensory object cues. Here, two visually presented target words ("pear" and "lilac") were repeatedly cued by corresponding odors or pictures, and the participants were to indicate matching or nonmatching combinations. Data were split in behaviorally "fast" versus "slow" trials. We hypothesized that slow trials would be associated with higher prestimulus alpha activity and reduced ERP amplitudes, and that response-time differences between odor-cued and picture-cued trials would be especially large in slow behavioral trials. Results confirmed that slow trials showed increased alpha-band activity prior to word target onset, as well as amplitude decreases in the sensory P1 and semantic N400 components. However, no interactions between cue-modality and processing speed were observed. Instead, odor-cue integration responses were uniquely delayed on incongruent trials, a novel behavioral effect that was not observed in EEG measures. The results show that semantic integration speed is reflected in cortical activity before and during stimulus processing. Behavioral interactions with cue modality did not correspond to observed cortical activity changes, perhaps because olfactory circuits are not readily observed in scalp-recorded EEG. We conclude that combining behavioral speed variability and cortical EEG measures is useful in understanding the fluctuating nature of cognitive processing sequences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
在心理实验中,行为速度在各次试验中会有所不同,这种变化通常与皮层活动的相应波动相关。对于语义启动任务中目标词与先前感官对象线索相匹配时的这种皮层变化,我们知之甚少。在此,两个视觉呈现的目标词(“梨”和“丁香花”)被相应的气味或图片反复提示,参与者要指出匹配或不匹配的组合。数据被分为行为上“快”与“慢”的试验。我们假设慢试验会与刺激前更高的阿尔法活动和降低的事件相关电位幅度有关,并且气味提示试验和图片提示试验之间的反应时间差异在慢行为试验中会特别大。结果证实,慢试验在单词目标出现之前显示出阿尔法波段活动增加,以及感觉P1和语义N400成分的幅度降低。然而,未观察到提示方式与处理速度之间的相互作用。相反,在不一致试验中,气味提示整合反应被独特地延迟了,这是一种在脑电图测量中未观察到的新行为效应。结果表明,语义整合速度在刺激处理之前和期间的皮层活动中得到反映。与提示方式的行为相互作用与观察到的皮层活动变化不对应,可能是因为在头皮记录的脑电图中不容易观察到嗅觉回路。我们得出结论,将行为速度变异性和皮层脑电图测量相结合有助于理解认知处理序列的波动性质。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2018美国心理学会,保留所有权利)