• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉与嗅觉对象的“快速”与“缓慢”词汇整合:决策速度变异性的脑电图生物标志物

"Fast" versus "slow" word integration of visual and olfactory objects: EEG biomarkers of decision speed variability.

作者信息

Olofsson Jonas K, Syrjänen Elmeri, Ekström Ingrid, Larsson Maria, Wiens Stefan

机构信息

Gosta Ekman Laboratory.

出版信息

Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;132(6):587-594. doi: 10.1037/bne0000266. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1037/bne0000266
PMID:30299144
Abstract

In psychological experiments, behavioral speed varies across trials, and this variation is often associated with corresponding fluctuations in cortical activity. Little is known about such cortical variations in semantic priming tasks where target words are matched with preceding sensory object cues. Here, two visually presented target words ("pear" and "lilac") were repeatedly cued by corresponding odors or pictures, and the participants were to indicate matching or nonmatching combinations. Data were split in behaviorally "fast" versus "slow" trials. We hypothesized that slow trials would be associated with higher prestimulus alpha activity and reduced ERP amplitudes, and that response-time differences between odor-cued and picture-cued trials would be especially large in slow behavioral trials. Results confirmed that slow trials showed increased alpha-band activity prior to word target onset, as well as amplitude decreases in the sensory P1 and semantic N400 components. However, no interactions between cue-modality and processing speed were observed. Instead, odor-cue integration responses were uniquely delayed on incongruent trials, a novel behavioral effect that was not observed in EEG measures. The results show that semantic integration speed is reflected in cortical activity before and during stimulus processing. Behavioral interactions with cue modality did not correspond to observed cortical activity changes, perhaps because olfactory circuits are not readily observed in scalp-recorded EEG. We conclude that combining behavioral speed variability and cortical EEG measures is useful in understanding the fluctuating nature of cognitive processing sequences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

在心理实验中,行为速度在各次试验中会有所不同,这种变化通常与皮层活动的相应波动相关。对于语义启动任务中目标词与先前感官对象线索相匹配时的这种皮层变化,我们知之甚少。在此,两个视觉呈现的目标词(“梨”和“丁香花”)被相应的气味或图片反复提示,参与者要指出匹配或不匹配的组合。数据被分为行为上“快”与“慢”的试验。我们假设慢试验会与刺激前更高的阿尔法活动和降低的事件相关电位幅度有关,并且气味提示试验和图片提示试验之间的反应时间差异在慢行为试验中会特别大。结果证实,慢试验在单词目标出现之前显示出阿尔法波段活动增加,以及感觉P1和语义N400成分的幅度降低。然而,未观察到提示方式与处理速度之间的相互作用。相反,在不一致试验中,气味提示整合反应被独特地延迟了,这是一种在脑电图测量中未观察到的新行为效应。结果表明,语义整合速度在刺激处理之前和期间的皮层活动中得到反映。与提示方式的行为相互作用与观察到的皮层活动变化不对应,可能是因为在头皮记录的脑电图中不容易观察到嗅觉回路。我们得出结论,将行为速度变异性和皮层脑电图测量相结合有助于理解认知处理序列的波动性质。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2018美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
"Fast" versus "slow" word integration of visual and olfactory objects: EEG biomarkers of decision speed variability.视觉与嗅觉对象的“快速”与“缓慢”词汇整合:决策速度变异性的脑电图生物标志物
Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;132(6):587-594. doi: 10.1037/bne0000266. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
2
A designated odor-language integration system in the human brain.人类大脑中一种特定的气味-语言整合系统。
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;34(45):14864-73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2247-14.2014.
3
Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.嗅觉对视觉分类的影响:行为和 ERP 证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jun 1;30(7):4220-4237. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa050.
4
Olfactory Categorization Is Shaped by a Transmodal Cortical Network for Evaluating Perceptual Predictions.嗅觉分类受评估感知预测的跨模态皮质网络塑造。
J Neurosci. 2024 May 29;44(22):e1232232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1232-23.2024.
5
A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Investigation of Effects of Visual Congruence on Olfactory Sensitivity During Habituation to Prolonged Odors.视觉一致性对长时间嗅觉习惯过程中嗅觉敏感性的行为和电生理影响研究。
Chem Senses. 2020 Dec 5;45(9):845-854. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa065.
6
Electrophysiological correlates of visual affective priming.视觉情感启动的电生理相关性
Brain Res Bull. 2006 Dec 11;71(1-3):316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.09.023. Epub 2006 Oct 26.
7
Tracking the time course of action priming on object recognition: evidence for fast and slow influences of action on perception.追踪动作启动对物体识别的时程:动作对知觉的快速和慢速影响的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Aug;23(8):1864-74. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21543. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
8
Repetition-priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems.重复启动调节与类别相关的事件相关电位效应:多个皮层语义系统的进一步证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Feb;17(2):199-211. doi: 10.1162/0898929053124938.
9
Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.早期皮层处理阶段的门控与感觉冲突任务中行为表现的变化有关。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jan 15;317:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
The functional neuroanatomy of odor evoked autobiographical memories cued by odors and words.气味和词语线索诱发的嗅觉自传体记忆的功能神经解剖学。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(1):123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.023. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive coding in the human olfactory system.人类嗅觉系统中的预测编码。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.04.005.
2
A cognitive nose? Evaluating working memory benchmarks in the olfactory domain.有认知功能的鼻子?评估嗅觉领域的工作记忆基准。
Chem Senses. 2025 Jan 22;50. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaf008.
3
Olfactory Categorization Is Shaped by a Transmodal Cortical Network for Evaluating Perceptual Predictions.嗅觉分类受评估感知预测的跨模态皮质网络塑造。
J Neurosci. 2024 May 29;44(22):e1232232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1232-23.2024.
4
A Review of the Effects of Valenced Odors on Face Perception and Evaluation.关于正负性气味对面部感知与评价影响的综述
Iperception. 2021 Apr 28;12(2):20416695211009552. doi: 10.1177/20416695211009552. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
5
Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.嗅觉对视觉分类的影响:行为和 ERP 证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jun 1;30(7):4220-4237. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa050.