Gösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm 114 19, Sweden
Gösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm 114 19, Sweden.
J Neurosci. 2024 May 29;44(22):e1232232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1232-23.2024.
Creating and evaluating predictions are considered important features in sensory perception. Little is known about processing differences between the senses and their cortical substrates. Here, we tested the hypothesis that olfaction, the sense of smell, would be highly dependent on (nonolfactory) object-predictive cues and involve distinct cortical processing features. We developed a novel paradigm to compare prediction error processing across senses. Participants listened to spoken word cues (e.g., "lilac") and determined whether target stimuli (odors or pictures) matched the word cue or not. In two behavioral experiments (total = 113; 72 female), the disparity between congruent and incongruent response times was exaggerated for olfactory relative to visual targets, indicating a greater dependency on predictive verbal cues to process olfactory targets. A preregistered fMRI study ( = 30; 19 female) revealed the anterior cingulate cortex (a region central for error detection) being more activated by incongruent olfactory targets, indicating a role for olfactory predictive error processing. Additionally, both the primary olfactory and visual cortices were significantly activated for incongruent olfactory targets, suggesting olfactory prediction errors are dependent on cross-sensory processing resources, whereas visual prediction errors are not. We propose that olfaction is characterized by a strong dependency on predictive (nonolfactory) cues and that odors are evaluated in the context of such predictions by a designated transmodal cortical network. Our results indicate differences in how predictive cues are used by different senses in rapid decision-making.
创建和评估预测被认为是感觉感知中的重要特征。对于不同感觉及其皮质基质之间的处理差异知之甚少。在这里,我们测试了这样一个假设,即嗅觉,即嗅觉,将高度依赖(非嗅觉)物体预测线索,并涉及独特的皮质处理特征。我们开发了一种新的范式来比较跨感觉的预测误差处理。参与者听取了口语提示(例如,“丁香”),并确定目标刺激(气味或图片)是否与单词提示匹配。在两项行为实验(共 113 名;72 名女性)中,嗅觉目标的一致和不一致反应时间之间的差异被夸大,表明对预测性言语提示的依赖性更强,以处理嗅觉目标。一项预先注册的 fMRI 研究(30 名;19 名女性)显示,前扣带皮层(一个中央用于错误检测的区域)对不一致的嗅觉目标的激活程度更高,表明嗅觉预测错误处理的作用。此外,初级嗅觉和视觉皮层都对不一致的嗅觉目标有明显的激活,这表明嗅觉预测错误依赖于跨感觉处理资源,而视觉预测错误则不然。我们提出嗅觉的特征是强烈依赖于预测(非嗅觉)线索,并且在这种预测的背景下,气味由指定的跨模态皮质网络进行评估。我们的结果表明,不同感觉在快速决策中如何使用预测线索存在差异。