• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗真菌药物管理:领域内的新进展。

Antifungal stewardship: developments in the field.

机构信息

National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.

National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship.

出版信息

Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;31(6):490-498. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000497.

DOI:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000497
PMID:30299362
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To outline key drivers and components of antifungal stewardship (AFS) programmes, the evidence for specific interventions, and methods to assess performance of programmes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments in antifungal resistance and breakthrough invasive fungal diseases have increased the urgency for effective AFS. In practice, however, few hospitals have dedicated AFS programmes. To date, AFS programmes have centred around the provision of expert bedside reviews and have reduced costs and consumption of antifungal agents. Incorporating tools such as fungal diagnostics and therapeutic drug monitoring into AFS programme models is recommended. However, the application and impact of these tools in this context have not been adequately assessed. The effectiveness of AFS programmes has been measured in multiple ways but a standardized method of evaluation remains elusive. Few studies have explored the impact of AFS interventions on patient outcomes.

SUMMARY

The uptake of formal AFS programmes has been slow. New initiatives integrating AFS tools in programmes, and measuring the impacts on patient outcomes are required given such data are not readily available. A comprehensive approach to evaluate AFS programmes by correlating the quantity and quality of antifungal prescribing with impacts on patient outcomes is needed. Consensus definitions for core AFS metrics are required to benchmark performance and are essential to the resourcing and sustainability of these programmes.

摘要

目的综述

概述抗真菌药物管理(AFS)计划的关键驱动因素和组成部分、具体干预措施的证据,以及评估计划绩效的方法。

最新发现

抗真菌药物耐药性和突破性侵袭性真菌感染的新进展增加了有效 AFS 的紧迫性。然而,实际上,很少有医院有专门的 AFS 计划。迄今为止,AFS 计划主要集中在提供专家床边审查上,并降低了抗真菌药物的成本和消耗。建议将真菌诊断和治疗药物监测等工具纳入 AFS 计划模型中。然而,这些工具在这方面的应用和影响尚未得到充分评估。AFS 计划的有效性已经通过多种方式进行了衡量,但标准化的评估方法仍然难以实现。很少有研究探讨 AFS 干预对患者结局的影响。

总结

正式的 AFS 计划的采用进展缓慢。鉴于此类数据尚不可用,需要新的举措将 AFS 工具整合到计划中,并衡量对患者结局的影响。需要通过将抗真菌药物处方的数量和质量与对患者结局的影响相关联来全面评估 AFS 计划。需要为核心 AFS 指标制定共识定义,以进行基准测试,这对于这些计划的资源和可持续性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Antifungal stewardship: developments in the field.抗真菌药物管理:领域内的新进展。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;31(6):490-498. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000497.
2
A systematic review of the impact of antifungal stewardship interventions in the United States.美国抗真菌药物管理干预措施影响的系统评价
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2019 Aug 21;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12941-019-0323-z.
3
Establishing essential metrics for antifungal stewardship in hospitals: the results of an international Delphi survey.建立医院抗真菌药物管理的基本指标:国际 Delphi 调查结果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):253-262. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa409.
4
An investigation of antifungal stewardship programmes in England.英国抗真菌管理计划调查
J Med Microbiol. 2017 Nov;66(11):1581-1589. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000612. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
5
Improving quality of antifungal use through antifungal stewardship interventions.通过抗真菌药物管理干预措施提高抗真菌药物使用质量。
Infection. 2019 Aug;47(4):603-610. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01288-4. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
The case for antifungal stewardship.抗真菌药物管理的理由。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012 Feb;25(1):107-15. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834e0680.
7
Antifungal stewardship in solid-organ transplantation: What is needed?实体器官移植中的抗真菌药物管理:需要什么?
Transpl Infect Dis. 2022 Oct;24(5):e13894. doi: 10.1111/tid.13894.
8
Antifungal stewardship with an emphasis on candidaemia.抗真菌药物管理,重点关注念珠菌血症。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Dec;19:262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.05.030. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
How can we optimise antifungal use in a solid organ transplant centre? Local epidemiology and antifungal stewardship implementation: A single-centre study.如何在实体器官移植中心优化抗真菌药物的使用?局部流行病学和抗真菌药物管理实施:一项单中心研究。
Mycoses. 2020 Jul;63(7):746-754. doi: 10.1111/myc.13098. Epub 2020 May 18.
10
Core Recommendations for Antifungal Stewardship: A Statement of the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium.抗真菌药物管理核心推荐:真菌病研究组教育和研究联盟的声明。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 5;222(Suppl 3):S175-S198. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa394.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting antifungal stewardship through an antifungal multidisciplinary team in a paediatric and adult tertiary centre in the UK.通过英国一家儿科和成人三级医疗中心的抗真菌多学科团队促进抗真菌药物管理。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Aug 5;6(4):dlae119. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae119. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Antifungal Stewardship in Invasive Fungal Infections, a Systematic Review.侵袭性真菌感染中的抗真菌管理:一项系统评价
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1476:49-68. doi: 10.1007/5584_2024_798.
3
Potential Strategies to Control the Risk of Antifungal Resistance in Humans: A Comprehensive Review.
控制人类抗真菌耐药性风险的潜在策略:全面综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 18;12(3):608. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030608.
4
Antifungal stewardship in solid organ transplantation.实体器官移植中的抗真菌药物管理。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2022 Oct;24(5):e13855. doi: 10.1111/tid.13855.
5
Antimicrobial stewardship in Australia: the role of qualitative research in programme development.澳大利亚的抗菌药物管理:定性研究在项目开发中的作用。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Nov 18;3(4):dlab166. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab166. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
(1,3)-β-D-Glucan-based empirical antifungal interruption in suspected invasive candidiasis: a randomized trial.基于(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖的经验性抗真菌治疗疑似侵袭性念珠菌病:一项随机试验。
Crit Care. 2020 Sep 5;24(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03265-y.
7
Core Recommendations for Antifungal Stewardship: A Statement of the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium.抗真菌药物管理核心推荐:真菌病研究组教育和研究联盟的声明。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 5;222(Suppl 3):S175-S198. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa394.