Suppr超能文献

侵袭性真菌感染中的抗真菌管理:一项系统评价

Antifungal Stewardship in Invasive Fungal Infections, a Systematic Review.

作者信息

Procacci Cataldo, Marras Luisa, Maurmo Leonarda, Vivanet Grazia, Scalone Luca, Bertolino Giacomo

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Department, ASL BAT, Barletta - Adria - Trani, Italy.

Laboratory Service, ASL 8, Cagliari, Italy.

出版信息

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1476:49-68. doi: 10.1007/5584_2024_798.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are a group of life-threatening diseases associated with significant morbidity, mortality and high healthcare costs. Some modern management programs known as AFS (antifungal stewardship programs) have now been developed. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the different declinations of antifungal stewardship programs (AFPs).

METHODS

Articles were systematically reviewed using the PRISMA checklist 2020. EMBASE and MEDLINE/PubMED were searched using the term "antifungal stewardship" (2012-2022 data) on 2 January 2023. Eligible studies were those that described an AFS and included an intervention, performance evaluation and outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 22/796 studies were included. Approximately two-thirds (16) were published between 2018 and 2022. 16 (72.7%) stated a minimal complete AFS team. 12 (54.5%) adopted a non-compulsory AFS approach, 6(27.3%) had an Educational AFS and 4(18.2%) a compulsory AFS. Cost analyses of 12 studies showed a decrease for 7 (31.8%) compared to an increase for 5 (22.7%). In terms of outcomes, 18 studies showed a lower (10;45.5%) or the same (8;36.4%) pre-post intervention mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

AFS programs seem to be related to lower costs and better outcomes and should thus be implemented in tandem with antimicrobial stewardship programs.

摘要

引言

侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)是一组危及生命的疾病,会导致严重的发病率、死亡率和高昂的医疗费用。目前已经制定了一些被称为抗真菌管理计划(AFS)的现代管理方案。本系统评价的目的是评估抗真菌管理计划(AFP)的不同形式。

方法

使用2020年PRISMA清单对文章进行系统评价。于2023年1月2日在EMBASE和MEDLINE/PubMED数据库中检索了2012年至2022年期间的数据,检索词为“抗真菌管理”。符合条件的研究是那些描述了抗真菌管理计划并包括干预措施、绩效评估和结果指标的研究。

结果

共纳入22项研究,占检索到的796项研究的一定比例。其中约三分之二(16项)研究发表于2018年至2022年之间。16项(72.7%)研究表明有一个基本完整的抗真菌管理团队。12项(54.5%)研究采用非强制性的抗真菌管理方法,6项(27.3%)研究采用教育性抗真菌管理方法,4项(18.2%)研究采用强制性抗真菌管理方法。12项研究的成本分析显示,7项研究(31.8%)成本下降,5项研究(22.7%)成本上升。在结果方面,18项研究显示干预前后死亡率降低(10项;45.5%)或相同(8项;36.4%)。

结论

抗真菌管理计划似乎与更低的成本和更好的结果相关,因此应与抗菌药物管理计划一并实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验