• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MOBI-Kids 研究中的不参与选择偏倚。

Nonparticipation Selection Bias in the MOBI-Kids Study.

机构信息

From the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.

Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2019 Jan;30(1):145-153. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000932.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000932
PMID:30299406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6276861/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

MOBI-Kids is a 14-country case-control study designed to investigate the potential effects of electromagnetic field exposure from mobile telecommunications devices on brain tumor risk in children and young adults conducted from 2010 to 2016. This work describes differences in cellular telephone use and personal characteristics among interviewed participants and refusers responding to a brief nonrespondent questionnaire. It also assesses the potential impact of nonparticipation selection bias on study findings.

METHODS

We compared nonrespondent questionnaires completed by 77 cases and 498 control refusers with responses from 683 interviewed cases and 1501 controls (suspected appendicitis patients) in six countries (France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, and Spain). We derived selection bias factors and estimated inverse probability of selection weights for use in analysis of MOBI-Kids data.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ever-regular use was somewhat higher among interviewed participants than nonrespondent questionnaire respondents 10-14 years of age (68% vs. 62% controls, 63% vs. 48% cases); in those 20-24 years, the prevalence was ≥97%. Interviewed controls and cases in the 15- to 19- and 20- to 24-year-old age groups were more likely to have a time since start of use of 5+ years. Selection bias factors generally indicated a small underestimation in cellular telephone odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 for ever-regular use and 0.92 to 0.94 for time since start of use (5+ years), but varied in alternative hypothetical scenarios considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by small numbers of nonrespondent questionnaire respondents, findings generally indicated a small underestimation in cellular telephone ORs due to selective nonparticipation.

摘要

背景

MOBI-Kids 是一项在 2010 年至 2016 年间进行的 14 个国家的病例对照研究,旨在调查移动电信设备产生的电磁场暴露对儿童和青少年脑瘤风险的潜在影响。本研究描述了参与和拒绝接受简短的非应答者问卷的应答者之间手机使用情况和个人特征的差异,并评估了非参与选择偏差对研究结果的潜在影响。

方法

我们比较了来自六个国家(法国、德国、以色列、意大利、日本和西班牙)的 683 名受访者和 1501 名对照者(疑似阑尾炎患者)的应答者与 77 名病例和 498 名对照者拒绝者完成的非应答者问卷。我们得出了选择偏差因素,并估计了选择权重的倒数概率,以用于分析 MOBI-Kids 数据。

结果

10-14 岁受访者中,接受访谈的参与者比非应答者问卷应答者中曾经经常使用手机的比例略高(对照组为 68%,病例组为 63%);在 20-24 岁组中,该比例≥97%。15-19 岁和 20-24 岁年龄组的受访者和病例更有可能开始使用手机的时间超过 5 年。选择偏差因素通常表明,对手机使用的比值比(OR)的低估幅度较小,范围在经常使用手机的 OR 从 0.96 到 0.97,开始使用手机的时间(5 年以上)的 OR 从 0.92 到 0.94,但在考虑的替代假设情景中有所不同。

结论

尽管非应答者问卷应答者的数量有限,但研究结果普遍表明,由于选择性不参与,手机 OR 存在轻微低估。

相似文献

1
Nonparticipation Selection Bias in the MOBI-Kids Study.MOBI-Kids 研究中的不参与选择偏倚。
Epidemiology. 2019 Jan;30(1):145-153. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000932.
2
Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: Results from the international MOBI-Kids study.儿童和青少年使用无线电话与神经上皮脑肿瘤:来自国际 MOBI-Kids 研究的结果。
Environ Int. 2022 Feb;160:107069. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107069. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
A critical analysis of the MOBI-Kids study of wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and brain tumor risk.对儿童和青少年使用无线电话与脑瘤风险的 MOBI-Kids 研究的批判性分析。
Rev Environ Health. 2022 May 5;38(3):409-421. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2022-0040. Print 2023 Sep 26.
4
Quantifying the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a case-control study of mobile phone use.量化因未参与手机使用病例对照研究而导致的选择偏倚的影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.006.
5
Exposure to Medical Radiation during Fetal Life, Childhood and Adolescence and Risk of Brain Tumor in Young Age: Results from The MOBI-Kids Case-Control Study.胎儿期、儿童期和青少年时期的医疗辐射暴露与年轻时脑肿瘤的风险:来自 MOBI-Kids 病例对照研究的结果。
Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(4):343-355. doi: 10.1159/000506131. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Impact of Radiofrequency Exposure From Mobile Phones on the Risk of Developing Brain Tumors in Korean and Japanese Adolescents: A MOBI-Kids Case-control Study.手机射频辐射暴露对韩国和日本青少年脑瘤发病风险的影响:MOBI-Kids 病例对照研究。
J Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 5;34(4):180-186. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20230005. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
7
Impact of random and systematic recall errors and selection bias in case--control studies on mobile phone use and brain tumors in adolescents (CEFALO study).青少年手机使用与脑肿瘤病例对照研究(CEFALO研究)中随机和系统回忆误差及选择偏倚的影响
Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Jul;32(5):396-407. doi: 10.1002/bem.20651. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
8
Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study.听神经瘤风险与移动电话使用的关系:INTERPHONE 国际病例对照研究结果。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;35(5):453-64. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
9
Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study.手机使用与儿童和青少年脑肿瘤:一项多中心病例对照研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Aug 17;103(16):1264-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr244. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
10
Investigation of bias related to differences between case and control interview dates in five INTERPHONE countries.五个国际癌症研究机构(INTERPHONE)参与国家中病例与对照访谈日期差异相关偏倚的调查。
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):827-832.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the knowledge structure of electromagnetic fields and health research: Text network analysis and topic modeling.识别电磁场与健康研究的知识结构:文本网络分析和主题建模。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0273005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273005. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Recall of mobile phone usage and laterality in young people: The multinational Mobi-Expo study.年轻人手机使用情况和偏向性的召回:多国 Mobi-Expo 研究。
Environ Res. 2018 Aug;165:150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Probabilistic Multiple-Bias Modeling Applied to the Canadian Data From the Interphone Study of Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Glioma, Meningioma, Acoustic Neuroma, and Parotid Gland Tumors.概率多重偏倚建模应用于加拿大手机使用与胶质瘤、脑膜瘤、听神经瘤和腮腺肿瘤风险的对讲机研究数据。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;186(7):885-893. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx157.
3
On the Need for Quantitative Bias Analysis in the Peer-Review Process.
同行评审过程中定量偏倚分析的必要性
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 May 15;185(10):865-868. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx057.
4
Quantitative Bias Analysis in Regulatory Settings.监管环境中的定量偏差分析。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Jul;106(7):1227-30. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303199. Epub 2016 May 19.
5
Selection bias was reduced by recontacting nonparticipants.通过再次联系未参与者,减少了选择偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.026. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
Using software-modified smartphones to validate self-reported mobile phone use in young people: A pilot study.使用软件修改后的智能手机验证年轻人自我报告的手机使用情况:一项试点研究。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2015 Oct;36(7):538-43. doi: 10.1002/bem.21931. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
7
Differences in participation rates and lessons learned about recruitment of participants--the European Health Examination Survey Pilot Project.参与率差异以及关于参与者招募的经验教训——欧洲健康检查调查试点项目
Scand J Public Health. 2015 Mar;43(2):212-9. doi: 10.1177/1403494814565692. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
8
The MOBI-Kids Study Protocol: Challenges in Assessing Childhood and Adolescent Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Wireless Telecommunication Technologies and Possible Association with Brain Tumor Risk.MOBI-Kids 研究方案:评估儿童和青少年暴露于无线通信技术电磁场的挑战以及与脑肿瘤风险的可能关联。
Front Public Health. 2014 Sep 23;2:124. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00124. eCollection 2014.
9
Good practices for quantitative bias analysis.定量偏倚分析的良好实践。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;43(6):1969-85. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu149. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
Estimating nonresponse bias in a telephone-based health surveillance survey in New York City.估计纽约市基于电话的健康监测调查中的无应答偏差。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct 15;178(8):1337-41. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt121. Epub 2013 Aug 28.