From the Center of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China (HQ, JhL, TZ, HW, JaL); and School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China (HW, JaL).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;98(4):280-286. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001067.
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of electrical stimulation in the treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain.
Eight databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials with a treatment duration of at least 2 wks comparing electrical stimulation with sham stimulation or no stimulation for patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. Shoulder pain on the hemiplegic side after stroke at baseline was required at study selection. The overall effects of electrical stimulation were calculated using a meta-analytic method.
Six studies were included. The pooled data indicated that electrical stimulation may have a positive effect for patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain on pain reduction (n = 193, standardized mean difference = -1.89, 95% confidence interval = -3.05 to -0.74) and pain-free external rotation (n = 164, weighted mean difference = 18.92, 95% confidence interval = 7.00 to 30.84). Meta-analysis also showed better recovery of activities of daily living independence in patient groups receiving electrical stimulation (n = 167, weighted mean difference = 8.96, 95% confidence interval = 5.26 to 12.66).
Electrical stimulation may be an effective pain management methodology for hemiplegic shoulders and may contribute to pain-free range of external rotation as well as activities of daily living recovery. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, given the low number of selected studies and risk of potential bias.
本研究旨在确定电刺激治疗偏瘫肩痛的效果。
系统检索了 8 个数据库,以寻找比较电刺激与假刺激或无刺激治疗偏瘫肩痛患者、治疗时间至少 2 周的随机对照试验。在研究选择时,要求患者在基线时有偏瘫侧肩部疼痛。采用荟萃分析方法计算电刺激的总体效果。
共纳入 6 项研究。汇总数据表明,电刺激可能对偏瘫肩痛患者的疼痛减轻(n=193,标准化均数差=-1.89,95%置信区间=-3.05 至-0.74)和无痛外旋(n=164,加权均数差=18.92,95%置信区间=7.00 至 30.84)有积极作用。荟萃分析还显示,接受电刺激的患者组日常生活活动独立性的恢复更好(n=167,加权均数差=8.96,95%置信区间=5.26 至 12.66)。
电刺激可能是治疗偏瘫肩痛的有效疼痛管理方法,可能有助于无痛外旋和日常生活活动恢复。然而,由于纳入研究数量较少且存在潜在偏倚风险,这些结果应谨慎解释。