Davis P C, Hoffman J C, Spencer T, Tindall G T, Braun I F
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Apr;148(4):797-802. doi: 10.2214/ajr.148.4.797.
Twenty-five patients with suspected pituitary adenoma were evaluated prospectively with CT and MR. Nine patients underwent transsphenoidal surgery, and three of these showed a documented decrease in size of mass on bromocriptine therapy. CT was more sensitive than MR for detecting focal lesions (seven vs three) and sellar-floor erosion (12 vs six). MR was superior to CT in identifying infundibular abnormalities (seven vs six), focal abnormalities of the diaphragma sellae (10 vs seven), cavernous sinus invasion (four vs two), and optic chiasm compression (six vs zero). Thus, MR may be the procedure of choice for optimal identification and localization of macroadenoma. For patients with suspected microadenoma, however, this preliminary series indicates that CT remains the radiographic procedure of choice.
对25例疑似垂体腺瘤的患者进行了CT和MR的前瞻性评估。9例患者接受了经蝶窦手术,其中3例显示溴隐亭治疗后肿块大小有记录的减小。CT在检测局灶性病变(7例对3例)和鞍底侵蚀(12例对6例)方面比MR更敏感。MR在识别漏斗异常(7例对6例)、鞍膈局灶性异常(10例对7例)、海绵窦侵犯(4例对2例)和视交叉受压(6例对0例)方面优于CT。因此,MR可能是最佳识别和定位大腺瘤的首选检查方法。然而,对于疑似微腺瘤的患者,这个初步系列研究表明CT仍然是首选的影像学检查方法。