• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[迷你吊带与经闭孔吊带:疗效与并发症]

[Mini-sling versus transobturator sling: Efficiency and morbidity].

作者信息

Grison P, Tixier S, Descamps P, Bigot P, Catala L, Legendre G

机构信息

Service d'urologie, CHU Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49100 Angers, France.

Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49100 Angers, France.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Nov;46(10-11):673-680. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2018.09.008
PMID:30301618
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of an ALTIS mini-sling and a conventionnal suburethral sling TVT-ABBREVO for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study included all female patients fitted with a conventional transobturator tape (TVT-ABBREVO) or mini-sling (ALTIS), during 2015, in Angers university hospital. The success rate was defined by no urine leakage during a cough test on clinical examination, improved quality of life defined by a PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) score of 1 to 3, and no stress urinary incontinence on USP (Urinary Symptom Profile) questionnaire. Morbidity associated with slings and perioperative data were also recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were included (39 in the ALTIS group and 53 in the ABBREVO group). The average follow-up was 13.55 months. The success rate was not significantly different in ALTIS group for the negative cough test (89.7% vs 94.3% in ABBREVO group, P=0.45), for the absence of urinary leakage reported on the USP questionnaire (87.2% vs 90.6% in ABBREVO group, P=0.61), or for the improvement of the quality of life with a PGI-I score between 1 and 3 (82.1% vs 86.8% in ABBREVO group, P=0.53). On the other hand, more patients were fully satisfied, with a PGI-I quality of life score of 1, in ABBREVO group than in ALTIS group (67.9% compared with 46.2%, P=0.03). Immediate postoperative pain was significantly less intense in ALTIS group than in ABBREVO group (average VAS score of 0.5 comparated with 1.3, P=0.01), but this difference had disappeared one week after surgery. The rates of other complications were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The functional results of the ALTIS and TVT-ABBREVO slings appear similar in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

摘要

目的

比较ALTIS迷你吊带与传统尿道下吊带TVT-ABBREVO治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效。

方法

一项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2015年在昂热大学医院接受传统经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术(TVT-ABBREVO)或迷你吊带(ALTIS)的所有女性患者。成功率的定义为临床检查咳嗽试验时无尿液渗漏、PGI-I(患者总体改善印象)评分为1至3所定义的生活质量改善以及USP(泌尿系统症状问卷)问卷中无压力性尿失禁。还记录了与吊带相关的发病率和围手术期数据。

结果

纳入92例患者(ALTIS组39例,ABBREVO组53例)。平均随访时间为13.55个月。ALTIS组在咳嗽试验阴性方面的成功率(89.7%对比ABBREVO组的94.3%,P = 0.45)、USP问卷中报告无尿液渗漏方面(87.2%对比ABBREVO组的90.6%,P = 0.61)或PGI-I评分为1至3时生活质量改善方面(82.1%对比ABBREVO组的86.8%,P = 0.53)与ABBREVO组相比无显著差异。另一方面,ABBREVO组PGI-I生活质量评分为1的完全满意患者多于ALTIS组(67.9%对比46.2%,P = 0.03)。ALTIS组术后即刻疼痛明显轻于ABBREVO组(平均VAS评分为0.5对比1.3,P = 0.01),但术后一周这种差异消失。两组其他并发症发生率相似。

结论

ALTIS和TVT-ABBREVO吊带在治疗女性压力性尿失禁方面的功能结果相似。

相似文献

1
[Mini-sling versus transobturator sling: Efficiency and morbidity].[迷你吊带与经闭孔吊带:疗效与并发症]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Nov;46(10-11):673-680. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
2
Single-incision mini-sling and trans-obturator sling for stress urinary incontinence: A 5-year comparison.经单切口微型吊带和经闭孔吊带治疗压力性尿失禁:5 年比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Mar;270:90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
3
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.单切口微型吊带与标准合成中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:SIMS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148.
4
TVT Abbrevo and Miniarc suburethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence - A randomised controlled trial.TVT Abbrevo和Miniarc耻骨后尿道悬吊术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Nov;230:141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
6
[Place of the mini-sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence].迷你吊带术在女性压力性尿失禁治疗中的应用
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Nov;42(7):639-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
7
Management of female stress urinary incontinence with single-incision mini-sling (Altis®): 36 month multicenter outcomes.经单切口 mini 吊带(Altis®)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的管理:36 个月的多中心结局。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Nov;42(8):1722-1732. doi: 10.1002/nau.25256. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
8
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
[Short-term evaluation of Altis® single-incision sling in women stress urinary incontinence].Altis®单切口吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的短期评估
Prog Urol. 2020 May;30(6):346-352. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
TVT-O vs. TVT-Abbrevo for stress urinary incontinence treatment in women: a randomized trial.经阴道尿道中段吊带术(TVT-O)与经阴道尿道中段吊带补片术(TVT-Abbrevo)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Apr;31(4):703-710. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04077-7. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision midurethral sling shows less pain and similar success rate in a short-term follow-up compared to the transobturator tape method in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.在治疗压力性尿失禁方面,与经闭孔吊带术相比,单切口尿道中段吊带术在短期随访中疼痛较轻,成功率相似。
Turk J Urol. 2019 Oct 25;46(1):63-68. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19105. Print 2020 Jan.