• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经单切口 mini 吊带(Altis®)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的管理:36 个月的多中心结局。

Management of female stress urinary incontinence with single-incision mini-sling (Altis®): 36 month multicenter outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Hospital Center of University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Department of Gynecology, Urological Research Network LLC, Nova Southeastern University, Hialeah, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Nov;42(8):1722-1732. doi: 10.1002/nau.25256. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1002/nau.25256
PMID:37555436
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess noninferiority of the safety and effectiveness of the Altis® Single Incision Sling (SIS) with standard midurethral transobturator and/or retropubic slings through 36 months in a prospective, longitudinal, nonrandomized US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 522 cohort study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult females with confirmed predominant stress urinary incontinence (UI) through cough stress test (CST) or urodynamics and failed two noninvasive incontinence therapies. Effectiveness endpoints included objective dryness, negative CST, adverse events, and revision/resurgery through 36 months. The primary effectiveness endpoint was reduction from baseline in 24-h pad weight of ≥50% at 6 months, as requested by the FDA, and is included as a study point in this paper. Primary safety endpoint was rate of related serious adverse events (SAE) through 36 months. Noninferiority margins of 15% and 10% were prespecified for the effectiveness and safety endpoints. Due to the observational nature of the cohort study, a propensity methodology was conducted to assess the effect of potential confounding variables on the primary endpoints between groups.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-five women underwent the sling procedure (n = 184 Altis; n = 171 Comparator). One hundred fourty (76%) Altis subjects and 101 (59%) Comparator subjects completed follow-up through 36 months. At 36 months, for the effectiveness endpoint, the difference in proportions of -0.005 for Altis versus Comparator (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.102 to 0.092) was statistically significant (p = 0.002), supporting the hypothesis that Altis is noninferior to Comparator. Furthermore, both groups demonstrated high objective efficacy; in the Altis arm n = 99 (81.8%) subjects were a success, and in the Comparator arm, n = 79 (82.3%) subjects were a success. Additionally, regarding the CST, Altis was found to be noninferior to the Comparator at every study visit, and the rate of negative CST remained above 80% for both groups (p < 0.001). At 36 months, Altis (n = 2; 1.1%) and Comparator (n = 4; 2.3%) subjects experienced a device and/or procedure-related SAE. The difference in proportions of 0.013 for Altis versus Comparator (95% CI: -0.023 to 0.048) was statistically significant (p < 0.001), demonstrating that Altis is noninferior to Comparator with respect to the primary safety endpoint throughout the study. There were 62 (36.3%) retropubic midurethral slings (RMUS), 96 (56.1%) transobturator midurethral slings (TMUS), and 13 (7.6%) SIS slings in the Comparator group. For the 36 month effectiveness endpoint, assessing the noninferiority of Altis versus RMUS and Altis versus TMUS, 99 (81.8%) Altis and 37 (90.2%) RMUS were a success, trending toward statistical significance, however, it cannot be determined to be noninferior (p = 0.092). Ninty-nine (81.8%) Altis and 33 (71.7%) TMUS were a success; this was statistically significant (p < 0.001), demonstrating Altis was noninferior to TMUS. Rates of negative CST were 122 (87.1%) Altis, 40 (93.0%) RMUS (p < 0.001), and 44 (91.7%) TMUS (p < 0.001). CST demonstrated that Altis was noninferior to RMUS and Altis was noninferior to TMUS at 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Altis single-incision sling was noninferior to standard midurethral sling for treatment of stress UI, throughout the study and at 36 months. Furthermore, adverse event rates were low.

摘要

目的

通过前瞻性、纵向、非随机美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)522 队列研究,评估 Altis®单切口吊带(SIS)与标准中尿道经闭孔和/或耻骨后吊带在 36 个月时的安全性和有效性的非劣效性。

材料和方法

通过咳嗽应激试验(CST)或尿动力学检查确认患有明显压力性尿失禁(UI)的成年女性,并经两种非侵入性失禁治疗失败。有效性终点包括客观干燥、CST 阴性、不良事件和 36 个月时的修订/再手术。主要有效性终点是根据 FDA 的要求,在 6 个月时 24 小时垫重减轻≥50%,该研究点也包含在本文中。主要安全性终点是 36 个月时与相关严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率。为有效性和安全性终点预先设定了 15%和 10%的非劣效性边界。由于队列研究的观察性质,采用倾向评分方法评估潜在混杂变量对主要终点的影响。

结果

355 名女性接受了吊带手术(n=184 名 Altis;n=171 名对照)。140 名(76%)Altis 受试者和 101 名(59%)对照受试者完成了 36 个月的随访。在 36 个月时,有效性终点的结果显示,Altis 与对照的差异比例为-0.005(95%置信区间:-0.102 至 0.092),具有统计学意义(p=0.002),支持 Altis 不劣于对照的假设。此外,两组均表现出高的客观疗效;在 Altis 组,n=99(81.8%)的受试者为成功,在对照组,n=79(82.3%)的受试者为成功。此外,关于 CST,Altis 在每次研究访视时均被证明不劣于对照,并且两组的 CST 阴性率均保持在 80%以上(p<0.001)。在 36 个月时,Altis(n=2;1.1%)和对照(n=4;2.3%)受试者经历了与器械和/或程序相关的 SAE。Altis 与对照的差异比例为 0.013(95%置信区间:-0.023 至 0.048),具有统计学意义(p<0.001),表明 Altis 在整个研究期间与对照相比在主要安全性终点上不劣效。对照组中有 62 例(36.3%)耻骨后中尿道吊带(RMUS)、96 例(56.1%)经闭孔中尿道吊带(TMUS)和 13 例(7.6%)SIS 吊带。对于 36 个月的有效性终点,评估 Altis 与 RMUS 和 Altis 与 TMUS 的非劣效性,99 名(81.8%)Altis 和 37 名(90.2%)RMUS 为成功,具有统计学意义趋势,但不能确定为非劣效(p=0.092)。99 名(81.8%)Altis 和 33 名(71.7%)TMUS 为成功,具有统计学意义(p<0.001),表明 Altis 不劣效于 TMUS。CST 阴性率分别为 122 名(87.1%)Altis、40 名(93.0%)RMUS(p<0.001)和 44 名(91.7%)TMUS(p<0.001)。CST 表明 Altis 在 36 个月时不劣效于 RMUS,且不劣效于 TMUS。

结论

Altis 单切口吊带在治疗压力性尿失禁方面不劣于标准中尿道吊带,在整个研究和 36 个月时均如此。此外,不良事件发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Management of female stress urinary incontinence with single-incision mini-sling (Altis®): 36 month multicenter outcomes.经单切口 mini 吊带(Altis®)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的管理:36 个月的多中心结局。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Nov;42(8):1722-1732. doi: 10.1002/nau.25256. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
A Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of a Single-incision Sling Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence.一项多中心前瞻性研究评估了单切口吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效和安全性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jan;28(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
3
Prospective study of a single-incision sling versus a transobturator sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 3-year results.单切口吊带与经闭孔吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的前瞻性研究:3 年结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):545.e1-545.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
4
A randomized trial of retropubic vs single-incision sling among patients undergoing vaginal prolapse repair.经阴道脱垂修复术的患者中经耻骨后与单切口吊带随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):261.e1-261.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.036. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.单切口微型吊带与标准合成中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:SIMS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148.
6
[Mini-sling versus transobturator sling: Efficiency and morbidity].[迷你吊带与经闭孔吊带:疗效与并发症]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Nov;46(10-11):673-680. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
7
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
8
Single-Incision Mini-Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.用于女性压力性尿失禁的单切口微型吊带
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1230-1243. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111815.
9
A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.经阴道单切口和经闭孔尿道中段吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
Efficacy and Safety of "I-Stop-Mini Adjustable" Sling System versus Transobturator Midurethral "Obtryx" Sling System in Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Cohort Study.“ I-Stop-Mini 可调节”吊带系统与经闭孔尿道中段“Obtryx”吊带系统治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效和安全性:回顾性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Apr;29(4):519-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 10.