Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jan;31(1):40-50. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12431. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
To assess and compare the 5-year success rate of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) fabricated from different materials.
An electronic search on 3 databases from January 1965 to March of 2017 was done for human randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. The key words used in the search were: Bridge OR bridges OR fixed partial OR fixed dental AND resin bonded OR Maryland OR ceramic bonded. Quality assessment was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Success was defined as the RBFPDs remaining in situ and not having experienced debonding, biological failures, or mechanical failures at the examination visit.
Meta analyses of the included studies showed an estimated 5-year success rate of 88.18% for the metal framework RBFPDs and 84.41% for the nonmetal framework RBFPDs. The estimated 5-year success rate for each nonmetal material category was 92.07% for zirconia, 94.26% for In-Ceram alumina, and 84.83% for fiber-reinforced composite. The failure rate was not statistically significant among the single, double, and multiple retainers RBFPDs (P > .05). Technical complications were the main reason for failures.
The 5-year clinical performance of RBFPDs is similar to the performance of conventional fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant-supported crowns.
Clinicians should consider using RBFPDs more often because their clinical performance is similar to the performance of conventional FPDs and implant-supported crowns.
评估和比较不同材料制作的树脂粘结固定局部义齿(RBFPD)的 5 年成功率。
从 1965 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月,对 3 个数据库进行电子检索,以获取人类随机临床试验(RCT)、前瞻性和回顾性队列研究。检索中使用的关键词为:桥或桥或固定部分或固定牙和树脂粘结或马里兰或陶瓷粘结。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。成功定义为 RBFPD 仍原位存在,在检查时未经历脱粘、生物学失败或机械失败。
纳入研究的荟萃分析显示,金属框架 RBFPD 的 5 年估计成功率为 88.18%,非金属框架 RBFPD 的 5 年估计成功率为 84.41%。每种非金属材料类别的 5 年估计成功率分别为氧化锆 92.07%、In-Ceram 氧化铝 94.26%和纤维增强复合材料 84.83%。单、双和多个固位体 RBFPD 的失败率无统计学意义(P>.05)。技术并发症是失败的主要原因。
RBFPD 的 5 年临床性能与传统固定局部义齿(FPD)和种植体支持的冠相似。
临床医生应考虑更频繁地使用 RBFPD,因为其临床性能与传统 FPD 和种植体支持的冠相似。