Hewitt Jayne E
PhD Candidate, Griffith Law School Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport 4222.
J Law Med. 2018 Oct;26(1):103-127.
Australia spends nearly 10% of its gross domestic product on health services. With such a substantial financial commitment, even relatively minor improvements in efficiency, effectiveness and productivity can increase community welfare. Competition is a well-recognised policy lever implemented to achieve these goals in market economies. However, it has for many years struggled to gain traction in the health care sector. This article traces recent attempts to promote competition principles in Australia's health care sector. Highlighting where these attempts have stalled, it compares Australia's recent health reforms with those instituted in the United Kingdom's National Health Service where a sector-specific competition regulator has been in place for several years. It concludes that there is room in Australia's regulatory landscape to improve public reporting and increased choice in health care. A sector-specific regulator is envisaged to support these important competition-based initiatives.
澳大利亚在医疗服务方面的支出占其国内生产总值的近10%。有了如此巨大的财政投入,即使在效率、效益和生产力方面实现相对较小的提升,也能增进社会福利。在市场经济中,竞争是实现这些目标的一项公认的政策手段。然而,多年来它在医疗保健领域一直难以取得成效。本文追溯了澳大利亚医疗保健领域近期推动竞争原则的尝试。文章突出了这些尝试受阻的地方,将澳大利亚近期的医疗改革与英国国民医疗服务体系所进行的改革作了比较,英国已设立了一个针对特定行业的竞争监管机构并运行数年。文章得出结论,澳大利亚的监管格局仍有改进空间,可加强公共报告并增加医疗保健方面的选择。设想设立一个针对特定行业的监管机构来支持这些重要的基于竞争的举措。