• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再探牙根切除术和半切术。第二部分:对195例接受治疗患者长达40年随访的回顾性分析。

Root Resection and Hemisection Revisited. Part II: A Retrospective Analysis of 195 Treated Patients with Up to 40 Years of Follow-up.

作者信息

Megarbane Jean-Marie, Kassir Abdel Rahman, Mokbel Nadim, Naaman Nada

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Nov/Dec;38(6):783-789. doi: 10.11607/prd.3797.

DOI:10.11607/prd.3797
PMID:30304067
Abstract

Root resection and hemisection is a well-documented treatment option for extending the life span of furcated molars. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the long-term results of root resection and hemisection of 195 patients with up to 40 years of follow-up. Records of 195 patients who had undergone root resection or hemisection were reviewed. A minimum follow-up of 5 years was needed. A molar was recorded as a survival if it was still present and functional without any signs of discomfort, pain, or pathology from restorative, endodontic, and periodontal points of view. Ninety-eight patients were excluded for not accomplishing the minimum 5-year observation period. Of the 97 remaining patients, 5 teeth were lost during the first 5 years of treatment and 92 teeth survived the follow-up period, ranging from 5 to 40 years. The overall survival rate was 94.8%. When up to 40 years of follow-up data were analyzed, it was found that high survival rates can be obtained with root resection and hemisection. The results are satisfying when a proper case selection, endodontic treatment, restorative design, and good maintenance program are given. This treatment option should always be considered before every extraction and implant placement.

摘要

牙根切除术和半切术是一种有充分文献记载的延长分叉磨牙寿命的治疗选择。本研究的目的是回顾性评估195例患者进行牙根切除术和半切术长达40年的随访结果。对195例接受牙根切除术或半切术患者的记录进行了回顾。需要至少5年的随访。如果磨牙仍然存在且功能正常,从修复、牙髓和牙周角度没有任何不适、疼痛或病变迹象,则记录为存活。98例患者因未完成至少5年的观察期而被排除。在其余97例患者中,5颗牙齿在治疗的前5年中脱落,92颗牙齿在5至40年的随访期内存活。总体存活率为94.8%。当分析长达40年的随访数据时,发现牙根切除术和半切术可获得较高的存活率。当进行适当的病例选择、牙髓治疗、修复设计和良好的维护计划时,结果是令人满意的。在每次拔牙和种植体植入之前,都应始终考虑这种治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Root Resection and Hemisection Revisited. Part II: A Retrospective Analysis of 195 Treated Patients with Up to 40 Years of Follow-up.再探牙根切除术和半切术。第二部分:对195例接受治疗患者长达40年随访的回顾性分析。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Nov/Dec;38(6):783-789. doi: 10.11607/prd.3797.
2
Root Resection and Hemisection Revisited. Part I: A Systematic Review.再探牙根切除术与半切术。第一部分:系统评价
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 Jan/Feb;39(1):e11-e31. doi: 10.11607/prd.3798.
3
Factors influencing the outcome of root-resection therapy in molars: a 10-year retrospective study.影响磨牙牙根切除术治疗效果的因素:一项10年回顾性研究
J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):32-40. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080316.
4
Periodontal treatment decisions for molars: an analysis of influencing factors and long-term outcome.磨牙的牙周治疗决策:影响因素及长期疗效分析
J Periodontol. 2000 Apr;71(4):579-85. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.579.
5
Retention of molars after root-resective therapy: a retrospective evaluation of up to 30 years.磨牙根管切除术后的保留:长达 30 年的回顾性评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1327-1335. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2220-1. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
6
A comparison of the success of root resected molars and molar position implants in function in a private practice: results of up to 15-plus years.私人诊所中根切磨牙与磨牙位置种植体功能成功率的比较:长达15年以上的结果
J Periodontol. 2001 Aug;72(8):1113-23. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.8.1113.
7
Hemisection and root amputation.半切术和牙根切除术。
J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 Apr;112(4):511-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0050.
8
Long-term evaluation of root-resected molars: a retrospective study.根管切除磨牙的长期评估:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 Jun;16(3):206-19.
9
Mandibular molar root resection versus implant therapy: a retrospective nonrandomized study.下颌磨牙牙根切除术与种植治疗:一项回顾性非随机研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(2):52-62. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.2.52.
10
Single crowns on tooth root-resected molars: A retrospective multicentric study.磨牙残根上的单冠:一项回顾性多中心研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Nov;124(5):547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.020. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A conservative treatment of an involved molar tooth associated with dentigerous cyst: a case report and literature review.涉及含牙囊肿的磨牙的保守治疗:病例报告及文献复习。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):1222. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04968-2.
2
Fatigue Resistance of Dissected Lower First Molars Restored with Direct Fiber-Reinforced Bridges-An In Vitro Pilot Study.直接纤维增强桥修复下颌第一磨牙离体牙的抗疲劳性能——一项体外初步研究
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;15(6):1343. doi: 10.3390/polym15061343.