Suppr超能文献

防范医疗保健的过度使用和使用不足——在全科医疗中建立优先排序标准和建议的方法学考量

Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care - methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice.

作者信息

Muche-Borowski Cathleen, Abiry Dorit, Wagner Hans-Otto, Barzel Anne, Lühmann Dagmar, Egidi Günther, Kühlein Thomas, Scherer Martin

机构信息

Department of General Practice / Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

General Community medical practice, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):768. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3569-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Initiatives such as "Choosing Wisely" in the USA and "Smarter Medicine" in Switzerland have published lists of widely overused health care services. The German initiative "Choosing Wisely Together (Gemeinsam Klug Entscheiden)" follows this example. The goal of our study was to prioritize important recommendations against the overuse and underuse of health care services. The final list of recommendations will be published in the German guideline "Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care".

METHODS

First, a multidisciplinary expert panel established a catalogue of prioritization criteria. Second, we extracted all the recommendations from evidence- and consensus-based German College of General Practice and Family Medicine (DEGAM) guidelines and National Health Care Guidelines (NVL). Third, the recommendations were rated by two independent panels (general practitioners and other health care professionals involved/not involved in guideline development). The prioritization process was finalized in a consensus conference held by DEGAM's Standing Guideline Committee (SLK).

RESULTS

Eleven prioritization criteria were established. A total of 782 recommendations were extracted and rated by 98 physicians and other health care professionals in a survey. In the voting process, more than 80% of the recommendations were eliminated. After the final consensus conference, twelve recommendations from DEGAM guidelines, nine DEGAM addenda and 17 NVL recommendations were chosen for inclusion in the guideline, for a total of 38 recommendations.

CONCLUSION

The selection procedure proved helpful in identifying the highest priority recommendations with which to combat the overuse and underuse of health care services. To date, in Germany there has been no attempt to compile such a list by using a systematic and transparent methodology. Hence, the guideline that results from this process can fill an important gap.

摘要

背景

美国的“明智选择”和瑞士的“更明智医疗”等倡议已公布了大量过度使用的医疗服务清单。德国的“共同明智选择”倡议也效仿了这一做法。我们研究的目的是对预防医疗服务过度使用和使用不足的重要建议进行优先排序。最终的建议清单将在德国“预防医疗服务过度使用和使用不足”指南中公布。

方法

首先,一个多学科专家小组制定了一套优先排序标准目录。其次,我们从基于证据和共识的德国全科和家庭医学学院(DEGAM)指南以及国家医疗保健指南(NVL)中提取了所有建议。第三,由两个独立小组(参与/未参与指南制定的全科医生和其他医疗保健专业人员)对这些建议进行评分。优先排序过程在DEGAM常设指南委员会(SLK)举行的共识会议上最终确定。

结果

确定了11项优先排序标准。在一项调查中,共提取了782条建议,并由98名医生和其他医疗保健专业人员进行评分。在投票过程中,超过80%的建议被淘汰。在最终的共识会议之后,选择了DEGAM指南中的12条建议、9条DEGAM增编和17条NVL建议纳入该指南,总共38条建议。

结论

该选择程序被证明有助于确定应对医疗服务过度使用和使用不足的最高优先级建议。迄今为止,德国尚未尝试使用系统且透明的方法编制这样一份清单。因此,这一过程产生的指南可以填补一个重要空白。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad3/6180663/83e132ed3dd4/12913_2018_3569_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验