Warkentin Lisette, Scherer Martin, Kühlein Thomas, Pausch Felix, Lühmann Dagmar, Muche-Borowski Cathleen, Hueber Susann
Institute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Institute and Polyclinic for Primary Care and Family Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 12;25(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02657-1.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness and use of the German guideline "Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care" from the general practitioners' (GPs') perspective. In addition, the study assessed how GPs perceive medical overuse and what solutions they have for reducing it.
We performed a cross-sectional online survey with recruitment from 15.06. to 31.07.2023. Participants were members of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (DEGAM). The main outcomes were the awareness and use of the guideline.
The analysis included data from 626 physicians. 51% were female and the median age was 50 years. The guideline is known by 81% of the participants, 32% read it in more detail. The majority considered the guideline a helpful tool in reducing overuse (67%). Almost 90% wished to have more guidelines with clear do-not-do recommendations. Physicians indicated in mean (M) that 30.2% (SD = 19.3%) of patients ask them for medical services that they do not consider to be necessary and that M = 30.2% (SD = 18.1%) of all GP services can be attributed to medical overuse. About half of the participants thought that overuse is a moderate or major problem in their practice (52%) and in general practice overall (58%). More participants rated that it is especially a problem in specialist (87%) and inpatient care (82%). Changes in the reimbursement system, raising awareness for the problem and more evidence-based guidelines were considered helpful in mitigating overuse.
Although the guideline is seen as a useful tool in mitigating medical overuse, there is still further potential for its implementation and utilisation. GPs see more overuse in the inpatient and outpatient specialist areas than in their area of practice. Instead of self-critically approaching the problem, the proposed strategies are aimed at the healthcare system itself.
本研究旨在从全科医生的角度评估德国“防止医疗保健过度使用和使用不足”指南的知晓度和使用情况。此外,该研究还评估了全科医生如何看待医疗过度使用以及他们有哪些减少医疗过度使用的解决方案。
我们于2023年6月15日至7月31日进行了一项横断面在线调查。参与者为德国全科医生和家庭医生学院(DEGAM)的成员。主要结果是该指南的知晓度和使用情况。
分析纳入了626名医生的数据。其中51%为女性,年龄中位数为50岁。81%的参与者知晓该指南,32%的人更详细地阅读过。大多数人认为该指南是减少过度使用的有用工具(67%)。近90%的人希望有更多带有明确禁止建议的指南。医生们平均表示,30.2%(标准差=19.3%)的患者向他们寻求他们认为不必要的医疗服务,并且所有全科医疗服务的30.2%(标准差=18.1%)可归因于医疗过度使用。约一半的参与者认为过度使用在他们的实践中(52%)以及总体全科医疗中(58%)是一个中度或重大问题。更多参与者认为这在专科医疗(87%)和住院护理(82%)中尤其成问题。报销系统的改变、提高对该问题的认识以及更多基于证据的指南被认为有助于减轻过度使用。
尽管该指南被视为减轻医疗过度使用的有用工具,但其实施和利用仍有进一步的潜力。全科医生认为住院和门诊专科领域的过度使用比他们自己的实践领域更多。所提出的策略并非自我批评地看待这个问题,而是针对医疗保健系统本身。