• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂疾病遗传检测结果回报的行为影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Behavioral impact of return of genetic test results for complex disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Behavioral Genetics.

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2018 Dec;37(12):1134-1144. doi: 10.1037/hea0000683. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1037/hea0000683
PMID:30307272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6263735/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Advances in genomewide association studies have made possible the return of genetic risk results for complex diseases. Two concerns about these results are (a) negative psychological consequences and (b) viewing probabilistic results as deterministic, leading to misinterpretation and inappropriate decisions. The present study evaluates these concerns through a meta-analytic review of existing literature.

METHOD

Seventeen genetic testing studies of complex disease, including 1,171 participants and reporting 195 effects, 104 of which were unadjusted for covariates, were meta-analyzed under a random effects model. Diseases included Alzheimer's, cardiovascular and coronary heart disease, lung cancer, melanoma, thrombophilia, and type II diabetes. Six domains of behavioral-psychological reactions were examined.

RESULTS

Carriers showed significantly increased self-reported behavior change compared to noncarriers when assessed 6 months or later after results return (Hedges's g = .36, p = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

Return of genetic testing results for complex disease does not strongly impact self-reported negative behavior or psychological function of at-risk individuals. Return of results does appear to moderately increase self-reported healthy behavior in carriers, although research on objectively observed behavior change is needed. This is a growing area of research, with preliminary results suggesting potential positive implications of genetic testing for complex disease on behavior change. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

全基因组关联研究的进展使得复杂疾病的遗传风险结果得以返回。人们对这些结果主要有两个担忧:(a)负面的心理后果,以及(b)将概率结果视为确定性的,从而导致误解和不当决策。本研究通过对现有文献的元分析评估了这些担忧。

方法

对包括阿尔茨海默病、心血管和冠心病、肺癌、黑色素瘤、血栓形成和 2 型糖尿病在内的 17 种复杂疾病的基因检测研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究共纳入了 1171 名参与者和 195 个效应,其中 104 个未对协变量进行调整,采用随机效应模型进行分析。共考察了六个行为-心理反应领域。

结果

在结果返回 6 个月或更长时间后,与非携带者相比,携带者的自我报告行为改变显著增加(Hedges's g =.36,p =.019)。

结论

复杂疾病基因检测结果的返回并没有强烈影响高危个体的自我报告负面行为或心理功能。结果的返回似乎确实适度增加了携带者的自我报告健康行为,但需要对客观观察到的行为变化进行研究。这是一个不断发展的研究领域,初步结果表明,复杂疾病的基因检测可能对行为改变产生积极影响。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Behavioral impact of return of genetic test results for complex disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.复杂疾病遗传检测结果回报的行为影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Psychol. 2018 Dec;37(12):1134-1144. doi: 10.1037/hea0000683. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
2
3
4
5
Genetic testing for hereditary melanoma and pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study of psychological outcome.遗传性黑色素瘤和胰腺癌的基因检测:心理结局的纵向研究。
Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):276-89. doi: 10.1002/pon.2080. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
6
Preclinical Studies of Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Administration in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.间充质干细胞(MSC)用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的临床前研究:系统评价与Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0157099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157099. eCollection 2016.
7
8
9
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
10
[Cognitive, emotional and behavioral impact of an uncertain outcome after study of BRCA1/2: review of the literature].[BRCA1/2基因检测后不确定结果对认知、情绪和行为的影响:文献综述]
Bull Cancer. 2011 Feb;98(2):184-98. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2011.1309.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Genetics in Early-Onset Cardiovascular Disease.遗传学在早发性心血管疾病中的作用。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 14;17(6):e85988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85988. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Systematic Review: The Psychosocial Impacts of Autism-Related Genetic Testing.系统评价:自闭症相关基因检测的心理社会影响
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2025.06.024.
3
The impact of supplementing traditional risk information with polygenic risk score concerning type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease on health behavior: a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep sequencing of 10,000 human genomes.一万个人类基因组的深度测序。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 18;113(42):11901-11906. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613365113. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
2
The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.传达疾病遗传风险对降低风险的健康行为的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1102.
3
Incorporating a Genetic Risk Score Into Coronary Heart Disease Risk Estimates: Effect on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels (the MI-GENES Clinical Trial).
补充2型糖尿病和冠心病多基因风险评分的传统风险信息对健康行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Community Genet. 2025 Mar 26. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00790-7.
4
Global Perspectives on Returning Genetic Research Results in Parkinson Disease.帕金森病基因研究结果反馈的全球视角
Neurol Genet. 2024 Dec 5;10(6):e200213. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200213. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Case-control association study between polygenic risk score and COVID-19 severity in a Russian population using low-pass genome sequencing.在俄罗斯人群中利用低深度全基因组测序进行多基因风险评分与COVID-19严重程度的病例对照关联研究。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Dec 26;153:e13. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824001778.
6
The Risk Information and Skin-cancer Education for Undergraduate Prevention (RISE-UP) Study: Protocol for a Trial of Personalized Sun Protection Interventions for Skin Cancer Prevention among Undergraduate Students.大学生皮肤癌预防风险信息与教育(RISE-UP)研究:一项针对大学生预防皮肤癌的个性化防晒干预试验方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;147:107728. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107728. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
7
Schoolhouse risk: Can we mitigate the polygenic Pygmalion effect?学校风险:我们能否减轻多基因皮格马利翁效应?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Aug;248:104403. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104403. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
8
Feasibility of precision smoking treatment in a low-income community setting: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial in The Southern Community Cohort Study.在低收入社区环境中进行精准戒烟治疗的可行性:南方社区队列研究中一项试点随机对照试验的结果。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Mar 15;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00441-1.
9
Polygenic effects on the risk of Alzheimer's disease in the Japanese population.多基因对日本人群阿尔茨海默病发病风险的影响。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Feb 27;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01414-x.
10
Feasibility of Identifying Factors Related to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia in Real-World Data.在真实世界数据中识别与阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症相关因素的可行性
medRxiv. 2024 Feb 13:2024.02.10.24302621. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.10.24302621.
将遗传风险评分纳入冠心病风险评估:对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的影响(MI-GENES临床试验)
Circulation. 2016 Mar 22;133(12):1181-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020109. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
4
Disclosing Pleiotropic Effects During Genetic Risk Assessment for Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Trial.在阿尔茨海默病基因风险评估中揭示多效性效应:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 2;164(3):155-63. doi: 10.7326/M15-0187. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
5
Are physicians prepared for whole genome sequencing? a qualitative analysis.医生们为全基因组测序做好准备了吗?一项定性分析。
Clin Genet. 2016 Feb;89(2):228-34. doi: 10.1111/cge.12626. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
6
Using ApoE Genotyping to Promote Healthy Lifestyles in Finland - Psychological Impacts: Randomized Controlled Trial.在芬兰利用载脂蛋白E基因分型促进健康生活方式——心理影响:随机对照试验
J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):908-21. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9826-8. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
7
An intervention study of individual, apoE genotype-based dietary and physical-activity advice: impact on health behavior.一项基于载脂蛋白E基因型的个性化饮食和身体活动建议的干预研究:对健康行为的影响。
J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2014;7(3):161-74. doi: 10.1159/000371743. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
8
Reporting incidental findings in genomic scale clinical sequencing--a clinical laboratory perspective: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology.基因组规模临床测序中偶然发现的报告——临床实验室视角:分子病理学协会报告
J Mol Diagn. 2015 Mar;17(2):107-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.10.004. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
9
Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions.整合数据以揭示基因型-表型相互作用的方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Feb;16(2):85-97. doi: 10.1038/nrg3868. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Psychiatric implications of cancer genetic testing.癌症基因检测的精神医学影响。
Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;121(3):341-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28879. Epub 2014 Sep 18.