Luckie Kate, Saini Bandana, Soo Yien Yien, Kritikos Vicky, Collins Jack Charles, Moles Rebekah Jane
a Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia.
b National Prescribing Service , Sydney , Australia.
J Asthma. 2019 Sep;56(9):973-984. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1508471. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
: To test the hypothesis that scenario-based skills training is more effective than knowledge training alone in improving the asthma first aid skills of school personnel. Education developed specifically for non-primary caregivers such as school staff is vital to minimize the risk of mortality associated with asthma. : Schools were allocated to one of three arms to compare AFA knowledge and AFA skills. Arm 1 underwent conventional asthma training, arm 2 underwent scenario-based training and arm 3 had a combination of the two. Conventional asthma training involved a didactic oral presentation. The scenario-based skills training required the participant to describe and demonstrate how they would manage a child having a severe exacerbation of asthma using equipment provided. Follow-up occurred at 3 weeks post baseline and again between 3-7 months after the first training/education visit. : Nineteen primary schools (204 participants) were recruited. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni Post-Hoc Tests showed there was a significant difference in AFA skills scores between the study arms who underwent scenario-based training; arms 2 and 3 (91.5% and 91.1%) and arm 1 who underwent conventional asthma training (77.3%) ( < 0.001). AFA knowledge improved significantly in all study arms with no differences between study arms. Improvements seen in both AFA knowledge and AFA skills were maintained over time. : Scenario-based training was superior to conventional didactic asthma training for AFA skills acquisition and overall competency in the administration of AFA and should be included in future asthma training programs.
为了检验基于情景的技能培训在提高学校工作人员哮喘急救技能方面比单纯的知识培训更有效的假设。为学校工作人员等非主要照顾者专门开展的教育对于将与哮喘相关的死亡风险降至最低至关重要。学校被分配到三个组之一,以比较哮喘急救知识和哮喘急救技能。第1组接受传统哮喘培训,第2组接受基于情景的培训,第3组接受两者结合的培训。传统哮喘培训包括一次说教式的口头陈述。基于情景的技能培训要求参与者描述并演示他们将如何使用提供的设备处理一名哮喘严重发作的儿童。在基线后3周以及首次培训/教育访问后3至7个月之间进行随访。招募了19所小学(204名参与者)。单因素方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验表明,接受基于情景培训的研究组之间在哮喘急救技能得分上存在显著差异;第2组和第3组(分别为91.5%和91.1%)与接受传统哮喘培训的第1组(77.3%)相比(<0.001)。所有研究组的哮喘急救知识都有显著提高,各研究组之间没有差异。哮喘急救知识和哮喘急救技能方面的改善随着时间的推移得以保持。对于哮喘急救技能的获得以及哮喘急救管理的总体能力而言,基于情景的培训优于传统的说教式哮喘培训,应纳入未来的哮喘培训项目中。