a School of Psychology , Deakin University , Burwood , Australia.
b School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences , Australian Catholic University , Melbourne , Australia.
Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 Jan;48(1):15-38. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1517389. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
Third-wave behavioural interventions are increasingly popular for treating and preventing mental health conditions. Recently, researchers have begun testing whether these interventions can effectively targeting eating disorder risk factors (disordered eating, body image concerns). This meta-analysis examined whether third-wave behavioural interventions (acceptance and commitment therapy; dialectical behaviour therapy; mindfulness-based interventions; compassion-focused therapy) show potential for being effective eating disorder prevention programs, by testing their effects on eating disorder risk factors in samples without an eating disorder. Twenty-four studies (13 randomized trials) were included. Most studies delivered selective prevention programs (i.e. participants who reported elevated risk factor). Third-wave interventions led to significant pre-post (g = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.43, 0.75) and follow-up (g = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.38, 1.28) improvements in disordered eating, and significant pre-post improvements in body image (g = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.56). DBT-based interventions were associated with the largest effects. Third-wave interventions were also significantly more efficacious than wait-lists (g = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.09, 0.69) in reducing disordered eating, but did not differ to other interventions (g = 0.25; 95% CI = -0.06, 0.57). Preliminary evidence suggests that third-wave interventions may have a beneficial effect in ameliorating eating disorder risk.
第三波行为干预措施越来越受到关注,用于治疗和预防心理健康问题。最近,研究人员开始测试这些干预措施是否可以有效地针对饮食障碍的风险因素(饮食失调、身体意象问题)。本荟萃分析通过测试第三波行为干预措施(接纳与承诺疗法、辩证行为疗法、正念为基础的干预措施、慈悲焦点疗法)在没有饮食障碍的样本中对饮食障碍风险因素的影响,来检验它们是否有潜力成为有效的饮食障碍预防计划。共有 24 项研究(13 项随机试验)被纳入。大多数研究提供了选择性预防计划(即报告存在风险因素的参与者)。第三波干预措施导致饮食障碍的显著前后(g=0.59;95%置信区间=0.43,0.75)和随访(g=0.83;95%置信区间=0.38,1.28)改善,以及身体意象的显著前后改善(g=0.35;95%置信区间=0.13,0.56)。基于 DBT 的干预措施与最大的效果相关。与等待名单相比,第三波干预措施在减少饮食障碍方面也明显更有效(g=0.39;95%置信区间=0.09,0.69),但与其他干预措施无差异(g=0.25;95%置信区间=0.06,0.57)。初步证据表明,第三波干预措施可能对改善饮食障碍风险具有有益的影响。