• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑共同点:明确心智化网络在交际性语言产生中的作用。

Taking common ground into account: Specifying the role of the mentalizing network in communicative language production.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0202943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202943. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202943
PMID:30307952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6181272/
Abstract

Several studies have shown that communicative language production as compared to non-communicative language production recruits parts of the mentalizing or theory of mind network, yet the exact role of this network in communication remains underspecified. In this study, we therefore aimed to test under what conditions the mentalizing network contributes to communicative language production. We were especially interested in distinguishing between situations in which speakers have to consider which information they do or do not share with their addressee (common vs. privileged ground information). We therefore manipulated whether speakers had to distinguish between common and privileged ground in order to communicate efficiently with the listener, in addition to comparing language production in a communicative and a non-communicative context. Participants performed a referential communicative game in the MRI-scanner as well as a similar, non-communicative task. We found that the medial prefrontal cortex, a core region of the mentalizing network, is especially sensitive to communicative contexts in which speakers have to take their addressee's needs into account in order to communicate efficiently. In addition, we found neural differences between the communicative and the non-communicative settings before speakers started to plan their utterances, suggesting that they continuously update common ground in a communicative context.

摘要

已有多项研究表明,与非交际性语言产生相比,交际性语言产生会激活心理理论或心智理论网络的部分区域,但该网络在交流中的具体作用仍不明确。因此,在这项研究中,我们旨在测试心理理论网络在交际性语言产生中起作用的条件。我们特别感兴趣的是区分说话者需要考虑与听话者共享或不共享哪些信息的情况(公共与私人信息)。因此,除了在交际和非交际语境下比较语言产生外,我们还操纵了说话者是否需要区分公共和私人信息,以便与听话者进行有效沟通。参与者在 MRI 扫描仪中进行了参考交际游戏,以及类似的非交际任务。我们发现,内侧前额叶皮层是心理理论网络的核心区域,在说话者必须考虑听话者的需求以进行有效沟通的交际语境中,该区域对交际语境特别敏感。此外,我们还发现,在说话者开始计划他们的话语之前,交际和非交际环境之间存在神经差异,这表明在交际语境中,他们不断更新公共领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/f828c0607c30/pone.0202943.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/cb37b8bcb061/pone.0202943.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/acfef5cff884/pone.0202943.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/95bab82a72f2/pone.0202943.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/7daf59eb40d4/pone.0202943.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/3a086376f13c/pone.0202943.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/53a958e90a63/pone.0202943.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/f828c0607c30/pone.0202943.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/cb37b8bcb061/pone.0202943.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/acfef5cff884/pone.0202943.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/95bab82a72f2/pone.0202943.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/7daf59eb40d4/pone.0202943.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/3a086376f13c/pone.0202943.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/53a958e90a63/pone.0202943.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6337/6181272/f828c0607c30/pone.0202943.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Taking common ground into account: Specifying the role of the mentalizing network in communicative language production.考虑共同点:明确心智化网络在交际性语言产生中的作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0202943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202943. eCollection 2018.
2
A dissociation between linguistic and communicative abilities in the human brain.人类大脑中语言和交际能力的分离。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):8-14. doi: 10.1177/0956797609355563. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
3
Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG.扫描仪中的对话互动:MEG揭示语言处理过程中的心理化
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Sep;25(9):3219-34. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu116. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
4
Intention processing in communication: a common brain network for language and gestures.交流中的意图处理:语言和手势的共同大脑网络。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2415-31. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21594. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
5
Increased functional coupling of the left amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex during the perception of communicative point-light stimuli.在感知交际性点光刺激时,左杏仁核和内侧前额叶皮层的功能连接增加。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):97-107. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy105.
6
Brains in dialogue: decoding neural preparation of speaking to a conversational partner.大脑对话:解码与对话伙伴交谈的神经准备过程
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):871-880. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx018.
7
The neural basis of free language choice in bilingual speakers: Disentangling language choice and language execution.双语者自由语言选择的神经基础:语言选择与语言执行的分离。
Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 15;177:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 May 9.
8
Brain networks of affective mentalizing revealed by the tear effect: The integrative role of the medial prefrontal cortex and precuneus.泪液效应揭示的情感心理化脑网络:内侧前额叶皮质和楔前叶的整合作用。
Neurosci Res. 2015 Dec;101:32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
9
Adjustment of speaker's referential expressions to an addressee's likely knowledge and link with theory of mind abilities.将说话者的指称表达调整为与听话者可能具备的知识相匹配,并与心理理论能力建立联系。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 17;6:823. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00823. eCollection 2015.
10
The selfless mind: How prefrontal involvement in mentalizing with similar and dissimilar others shapes empathy and prosocial behavior.无私的心灵:前额叶在与相似和不同他人进行心理化过程中的参与如何塑造同理心和亲社会行为。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:24-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Pragmatics partially segregated from Theory of Mind: evidence from resting-state functional connectivity.语用学与心理理论部分分离:来自静息态功能连接的证据。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Aug 14;380(1932):20230498. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0498.
2
Conversational production and comprehension: fMRI-evidence reminiscent of but deviant from the classical Broca-Wernicke model.会话产生和理解:fMRI 证据既令人想起但又不同于经典的布洛卡-韦尼克模型。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Mar 1;34(3). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae073.
3
When did you stop speaking to yourself? Age-related differences in adolescents' world knowledge-based audience design.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling Reference Production as the Probabilistic Combination of Multiple Perspectives.将参考生成建模为多个视角的概率组合。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 4:974-1008. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12582. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
Listeners use speaker identity to access representations of spatial perspective during online language comprehension.听众在在线语言理解过程中利用说话者身份来获取空间视角的表征。
Cognition. 2016 Feb;147:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
3
Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies.
你什么时候不再自言自语了?青少年基于世界知识的受众设计中的年龄差异。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Nov 30;9(11):220305. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220305. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Cognitive and Neuroanatomic Accounts of Referential Communication in Focal Dementia.局灶性痴呆患者参照性沟通的认知神经解剖学解释
eNeuro. 2019 Sep 26;6(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0488-18.2019. Print 2019 Sep/Oct.
心理理论的细分:功能性脑成像研究的元分析
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 May;42:9-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
4
Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations.功能磁共振成像分析中基于簇范围的阈值设定:陷阱与建议
Neuroimage. 2014 May 1;91:412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.058. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
5
Common brain areas engaged in false belief reasoning and visual perspective taking: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies.共同参与虚假信念推理和视觉视角-taking 的大脑区域:功能脑成像研究的荟萃分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 1;7:712. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00712. eCollection 2013.
6
Neural mechanisms of communicative innovation.交际创新的神经机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 3;110(36):14574-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303170110. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
7
Individual differences in speakers' perspective taking: the roles of executive control and working memory.个体在观点采择方面的差异:执行控制和工作记忆的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):766-72. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0396-1.
8
Pragmatics in action: indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network.语用学的实践:间接请求激活心理理论区域和大脑皮质运动网络。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Nov;24(11):2237-47. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00274. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
9
Developmental differences in the control of action selection by social information.社会信息对动作选择控制的发展差异。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Oct;24(10):2080-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00268. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation.会话中视角和目标对参照语生成的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):699-707. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0262-6.