Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Boston Medical Center Injury Prevention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205279. eCollection 2018.
Falls are a serious and common problem among older adults. Low-tech, inexpensive, community-based fall prevention programs have been shown to be both effective and cost effective, however, these programs are not well-integrated into clinical practice.
We surveyed primary care providers at a convenience sample of two accountable care organizations in Massachusetts to assess their beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and practices relative to fall risk assessment and intervention for their older patients.
Response rate was 71%. Providers' beliefs about the efficacy of fall risk assessment and intervention were mixed. Eighty-seven percent believed that they could be effective in reducing fall risk among their older adult patients. Ninety-six percent believed that all older adults should be assessed for fall risk; and, 85% believed that this assessment would identify fall risk factors that could be modified. Nonetheless, only 52% believed that they had the expertise to conduct fall risk assessment and only 68% believed that assessing older adult patients for fall risk was the prevailing standard of practice among their peer providers. Although most providers believed it likely that an evidence-based program could reduce fall risk among their patients, only 14% were aware of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's fall risk assessment algorithm (STEADI Toolkit), and only 15% were familiar with Matter of Balance, the most widely disseminated community fall risk prevention program in Massachusetts.
New strategies that more directly target providers are needed to accelerate integration of fall risk assessment and intervention into primary care practice.
老年人跌倒问题严重且常见。事实证明,低技术、低成本、以社区为基础的跌倒预防方案具有有效性和成本效益,然而,这些方案并未很好地融入临床实践中。
我们对马萨诸塞州两个以责任为基础的医疗保健组织中的便利抽样的初级保健提供者进行了调查,以评估他们对其老年患者跌倒风险评估和干预的信念、态度、知识和实践情况。
回应率为 71%。提供者对跌倒风险评估和干预的有效性的看法不一。87%的人认为他们可以有效降低老年患者的跌倒风险。96%的人认为所有老年人都应该进行跌倒风险评估;并且 85%的人认为这一评估可以确定可以改变的跌倒风险因素。尽管如此,只有 52%的人认为自己有进行跌倒风险评估的专业知识,只有 68%的人认为评估老年患者的跌倒风险是其同行提供者中普遍的实践标准。尽管大多数提供者认为一个基于证据的方案有可能降低患者的跌倒风险,但只有 14%的人了解疾病控制与预防中心的跌倒风险评估算法(STEADI 工具包),只有 15%的人熟悉 Matter of Balance,这是马萨诸塞州传播最广泛的社区跌倒预防方案。
需要新的更直接针对提供者的策略,以加速将跌倒风险评估和干预融入初级保健实践中。