• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

历时比较语言学图集 (DiACL)-古代语言类型学数据库。

Diachronic Atlas of Comparative Linguistics (DiACL)-A database for ancient language typology.

机构信息

Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Comparative Linguistics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205313. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0205313
PMID:30307985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6181559/
Abstract

Feature stability, time and tempo of change, and the role of genealogy versus areality in creating linguistic diversity are important issues in current computational research on linguistic typology. This paper presents a database initiative, DiACL Typology, which aims to provide a resource for addressing these questions with specific of the extended Indo-European language area of Eurasia, the region with the best documented linguistic history. The database is pre-prepared for statistical and phylogenetic analyses and contains both linguistic typological data from languages spanning over four millennia, and linguistic metadata concerning geographic location, time period, and reliability of sources. The typological data has been organized according to a hierarchical model of increasing granularity in order to create datasets that are complete and representative.

摘要

特征稳定性、变化的时间和节奏,以及在创造语言多样性方面的谱系与现实的作用,是当前计算语言类型学研究中的重要问题。本文提出了一个数据库计划,即 DiaCL Typology,旨在为解决这些问题提供资源,特别是针对欧亚大陆的扩展印欧语区域,这是语言历史记录最完善的地区。该数据库已预先为统计和系统发育分析做好准备,包含跨越四千多年的语言的语言类型学数据,以及关于地理位置、时间段和来源可靠性的语言元数据。该类型学数据已按照一个层次模型进行组织,以创建完整和具有代表性的数据集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/bf7a627fb944/pone.0205313.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/21f91e23bbbe/pone.0205313.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/2ed933b5c442/pone.0205313.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/20e2fb2d41be/pone.0205313.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/2e34d710f175/pone.0205313.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/1a9ed5a83c65/pone.0205313.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/7786079c65fd/pone.0205313.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/55db564a16c0/pone.0205313.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/cbfaddc30513/pone.0205313.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/bf7a627fb944/pone.0205313.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/21f91e23bbbe/pone.0205313.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/2ed933b5c442/pone.0205313.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/20e2fb2d41be/pone.0205313.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/2e34d710f175/pone.0205313.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/1a9ed5a83c65/pone.0205313.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/7786079c65fd/pone.0205313.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/55db564a16c0/pone.0205313.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/cbfaddc30513/pone.0205313.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f13/6181559/bf7a627fb944/pone.0205313.g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Diachronic Atlas of Comparative Linguistics (DiACL)-A database for ancient language typology.历时比较语言学图集 (DiACL)-古代语言类型学数据库。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205313. eCollection 2018.
2
The Potential of Automatic Word Comparison for Historical Linguistics.自动词比较在历史语言学中的潜力
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170046. eCollection 2017.
3
Historical linguistics in Australia: trees, networks and their implications.澳大利亚历史语言学:树、网络及其影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 12;365(1559):3845-54. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0013.
4
Nonlinear diversification rates of linguistic phylogenies over the Holocene.全新世语言谱系的非线性多样化速率。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 17;14(7):e0213126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213126. eCollection 2019.
5
Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family.绘制印欧语系的起源和扩张图。
Science. 2012 Aug 24;337(6097):957-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1219669.
6
Hypothesis, analysis and synthesis, it's all Greek to me.假设、分析和综合,对我来说都是天书。
Elife. 2019 Feb 20;8:e43514. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43514.
7
Approaching human language with complex networks.用复杂网络研究人类语言
Phys Life Rev. 2014 Dec;11(4):598-618. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
8
Computational phylogenetics reveal histories of sign languages.计算系统发生学揭示了手语的历史。
Science. 2024 Feb 2;383(6682):519-523. doi: 10.1126/science.add7766. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
9
The Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications, reproducible analysis of cross-linguistic polysemies.跨语言搭配数据库,跨语言多义词的可重复分析。
Sci Data. 2020 Jan 13;7(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0341-x.
10
Using hybridization networks to retrace the evolution of Indo-European languages.利用杂交网络追溯印欧语系语言的演变。
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Sep 6;16(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0745-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Euclide, the crow, the wolf and the pedestrian: distance metrics for linguistic typology.欧几里得、乌鸦、狼与行人:语言类型学的距离度量
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jul 2;3:104. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16141.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Lexical diversity in kinship across languages and dialects.跨语言和方言的亲属关系中的词汇多样性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 20;14:1229697. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1229697. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Some structural aspects of language are more stable than others: a comparison of seven methods.语言的某些结构方面比其他方面更稳定:七种方法的比较。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055009. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
2
Abstract profiles of structural stability point to universal tendencies, family-specific factors, and ancient connections between languages.抽象的结构稳定性特征指向普遍趋势、家族特定因素以及语言之间的古老联系。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045198. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
3
Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family.
绘制印欧语系的起源和扩张图。
Science. 2012 Aug 24;337(6097):957-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1219669.
4
Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals.语言的进化结构显示了语序共性在谱系特异性方面的趋势。
Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):79-82. doi: 10.1038/nature09923. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
5
Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: reconciling results from simulations and empirical data.系统发育分析中的缺失数据:协调模拟结果与实证数据
Syst Biol. 2011 Oct;60(5):719-31. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr025. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
6
Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin.语言树的分化时间支持印欧语系起源的安纳托利亚理论。
Nature. 2003 Nov 27;426(6965):435-9. doi: 10.1038/nature02029.
7
Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion.语言树支持南岛语系扩张的快速序列。
Nature. 2000 Jun 29;405(6790):1052-5. doi: 10.1038/35016575.