• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施世界卫生组织 ICOPE 方法的社区老年人综合护理所需的行动:全球德尔菲共识研究。

Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study.

机构信息

Department of Ageing and Life Course, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205533. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0205533
PMID:30308077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6181385/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integrated care is recognised as an important enabler to healthy ageing, yet few countries have managed to sustainably deliver integrated care for older people. We aimed to gather global consensus on the key actions required to realign health and long-term systems and integrate services to implement the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) approach.

METHODS

A two-round eDelphi study, including a global consultation meeting, was undertaken to identify, refine and generate consensus on the actions required across high-, middle- and low-income countries to implement the WHO ICOPE approach. In round 1, a framework of 31 actions, empirically derived from previous WHO evidence reviews was presented to panellists to judge the relative importance of each action (numeric rating scale; range:1-9) and provide free-text comments concerning the scope of the actions. These outcomes were discussed and debated at the global consultation meeting. In round 2, a revised framework of 19 actions was presented to panellists to measure their extent of agreement and identify 'essential' actions (five-point Likert scale; range: strongly agree to strongly disagree). A threshold of ≥80% for agree/strongly agree was set a priori for consensus.

RESULTS

After round 1 (n = 80 panellists), median scores across 31 actions ranged from 6 to 9. Based on pre-defined category thresholds for median scores, panellists considered 28 actions (90·3%) as 'important' and three (9·7%) as 'uncertain'. Fifteen additional actions were suggested for inclusion based on free-text comments, creating 46 for consideration at the global consultation meeting. In round 2 (n = 84 panellists), agreement (agree or strongly agree) ranged from 84·6-97·6%, suggesting consensus. Fourteen (73·7%) actions were rated as essential.

CONCLUSION

Fourteen essential actions and five important actions are necessary at system (macro; n = 10) and service (meso; n = 9) levels to implement community-based integrated care for older people.

摘要

背景

综合护理被认为是实现健康老龄化的重要手段,但很少有国家能够可持续地为老年人提供综合护理。我们旨在就重新调整卫生和长期护理系统以及整合服务以实施世界卫生组织(WHO)老年人综合护理(ICOPE)方法所需的关键行动达成全球共识。

方法

采用两轮电子德尔菲研究,包括一次全球协商会议,以确定、完善和就实施 WHO ICOPE 方法在高、中、低收入国家所需的行动达成共识。在第一轮中,向小组成员提出了一个由 31 项行动组成的框架,这些行动是根据之前的 WHO 证据审查经验得出的,供小组成员判断每项行动的相对重要性(数字评分量表;范围:1-9),并就行动范围提供自由文本评论。这些结果在全球协商会议上进行了讨论和辩论。在第二轮中,向小组成员提出了一个经过修订的 19 项行动框架,以衡量他们的一致程度并确定“必要”行动(五点李克特量表;范围:非常同意到非常不同意)。事先设定了≥80%的同意/强烈同意作为共识的阈值。

结果

第一轮(n=80 名小组成员)后,31 项行动的中位数得分范围为 6 至 9。根据中位数得分的预定义类别阈值,小组成员认为 28 项行动(90.3%)为“重要”,3 项行动(9.7%)为“不确定”。根据自由文本评论,还建议纳入 15 项额外行动,共 46 项在全球协商会议上审议。第二轮(n=84 名小组成员)的同意率(同意或强烈同意)范围为 84.6-97.6%,表明达成共识。14 项行动(73.7%)被评为必不可少。

结论

实施以社区为基础的老年人综合护理需要在系统(宏观;n=10)和服务(中观;n=9)层面上采取 14 项必要行动和 5 项重要行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9df/6181385/8d6755271210/pone.0205533.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9df/6181385/00f67edb3bbb/pone.0205533.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9df/6181385/8d6755271210/pone.0205533.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9df/6181385/00f67edb3bbb/pone.0205533.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9df/6181385/8d6755271210/pone.0205533.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study.实施世界卫生组织 ICOPE 方法的社区老年人综合护理所需的行动:全球德尔菲共识研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205533. eCollection 2018.
2
International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study.国际综合护理和跨境工作重点研究:电子德尔菲研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Oct 14;36(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae095.
3
Consensus on pre-operative total knee replacement education and prehabilitation recommendations: a UK-based modified Delphi study.术前全膝关节置换教育与预康复建议的共识:一项基于英国的改良德尔菲研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 14;22(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04160-5.
4
Assessing the Readiness for Implementing the World Health Organization's ICOPE Approach in Hong Kong: Perspectives from Social Care and Policy Stakeholders.评估香港实施世界卫生组织 ICOPE 方法的准备情况:来自社会关怀和政策利益相关者的观点。
J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(2):126-133. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.3.
5
Implementation and impact of the World Health Organization integrated care for older people (ICOPE) program in China: a randomised controlled trial.在中国实施和评估世界卫生组织老年人综合关怀计划(ICOPE):一项随机对照试验。
Age Ageing. 2024 Jan 2;53(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad249.
6
What outcomes should be measured in feline chronic kidney disease treatment trials? Establishing a core outcome set for research.在猫慢性肾病治疗试验中应该测量哪些结局?建立研究的核心结局集。
Prev Vet Med. 2021 Jul;192:105348. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105348. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
7
Developing lifestyle intervention program for pre-hypertensive patients; consensus building using a modified Delphi approach.制定高血压前期患者生活方式干预方案;使用改良 Delphi 法达成共识。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 10;19(10):e0311766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311766. eCollection 2024.
8
Development of the consensus-based recommendations for Podiatry care of Neuropathy In Cancer Survivors (PodNICS): a Delphi consensus study of Australian podiatrists.基于共识的癌症幸存者神经病变足部护理推荐意见的制定(PodNICS):澳大利亚足病医生的 Delphi 共识研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jun 9;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00632-0.
9
Framework Implementation of the INSPIRE ICOPE-CARE Program in Collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Occitania Region.与世界卫生组织(WHO)合作在奥克西塔尼地区实施 INSPIRE ICOPE-CARE 计划的框架。
J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(2):103-109. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2020.26.
10
Development of planning of the integrated care for older people in China: a theory of change approach.中国老年人综合护理规划的发展:一种变革理论方法
BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 10;25(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05956-z.

引用本文的文献

1
What influences older people to join a community hub to engage in healthy ageing programs? An exploratory study.是什么影响老年人加入社区中心参与健康老龄化项目?一项探索性研究。
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Sep;44(3):e70079. doi: 10.1111/ajag.70079.
2
Understanding deinstitutionalization policies for older adults through sarcopenia and the place of aging in Spain.通过肌肉减少症以及衰老在西班牙的情况来理解针对老年人的去机构化政策。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20587. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06036-3.
3
Promoting Healthy Aging for Older People Living with Chronic Disease by Implementing Community Health Programs: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Sustainable Development Agenda Needs to Include Long-term Care.可持续发展议程需要包括长期护理。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Sep;19(9):725-727. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.009.
2
Scaffolding our systems? Patients and families 'reaching in' as a source of healthcare resilience.支撑我们的系统?患者和家庭“主动参与”作为医疗恢复力的一个来源。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008216. Epub 2018 May 15.
3
Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US).
通过实施社区健康项目促进慢性病老年人的健康老龄化:一项随机对照可行性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 13;21(12):1667. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121667.
4
Integrated Care Services for Dementia and Their Challenges from a Nursing Home Perspective: An Ethnographic Study.从养老院视角看痴呆症综合护理服务及其挑战:一项人种志研究
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Dec 13;24(4):12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8592. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
5
Long-term Trajectories of Low Back Pain in Older Men: A Prospective Cohort Study With 10-Year Analysis of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.老年男性慢性腰痛的长期转归:一项前瞻性队列研究,对男性骨质疏松性骨折研究进行了 10 年的分析。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Sep 1;79(9). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae175.
6
Beyond integrated care for older adults.超越老年人综合护理。
Nat Aging. 2024 Jan;4(1):1-4. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00542-7.
7
Readiness for Integrated Care of Older People: A Cross-Sectional Study in Mexico.老年人综合护理的准备情况:墨西哥的一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 29;15(11):e49646. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49646. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health.加强卫生系统以遏制全球残疾负担:制定改善肌肉骨骼健康全球战略优先组成部分的实证研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006045. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
9
Development of a conceptual framework to scale up co-managed care for older patients with hip fracture in China: a qualitative study.制定概念框架以扩大中国老年髋部骨折患者共同管理护理的规模:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09910-w.
10
Evaluating the design of the Integrated Care for Older People: a theory of change approach.评估老年人综合护理的设计:一种变革理论方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 12;10:1166196. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1166196. eCollection 2023.
老龄化障碍影响老年人使用移动健康的可用性:基于文献的框架(MOLD-US)。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jun;114:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews.老年人综合护理方法的要素:综述之综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 7;8(4):e021194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021194.
5
End User and Implementer Experiences of mHealth Technologies for Noncommunicable Chronic Disease Management in Young Adults: Systematic Review.年轻人非传染性慢性病管理中移动健康技术的终端用户和实施者体验:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 12;19(12):e406. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8888.
6
Organizing integrated health-care services to meet older people's needs.组织整合型医疗保健服务以满足老年人的需求。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Nov 1;95(11):756-763. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.187617. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
From micro to macro: assessing implementation of integrated care in Australia.从微观到宏观:评估澳大利亚综合护理的实施情况。
Aust J Prim Health. 2018 Mar;24(1):59-65. doi: 10.1071/PY17024.
8
What works in implementation of integrated care programs for older adults with complex needs? A realist review.对于有复杂需求的老年人,综合护理计划实施中哪些措施有效?一项实在论综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):612-624. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx095.
9
Stakeholders' views and experiences of care and interventions for addressing frailty and pre-frailty: A meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.利益相关者对解决衰弱和衰弱前期的护理及干预措施的看法和体验:定性证据的元整合
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0180127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180127. eCollection 2017.
10
Integrated care for older populations and its implementation facilitators and barriers: A rapid scoping review.老年人群的综合护理及其实施的促进因素和障碍:一项快速综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):327-334. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx041.