Establishing the waist as the better location for attaching a single accelerometer to estimate center of pressure trajectories.

BACKGROUND

In this study, we seek to replace conventional force platforms with a single accelerometer for measuring Center of Pressure trajectories, in order to achieve portability and convenience without sacrificing accuracy.

METHODS

We measure the actual Anterior/Posterior and Medial/Lateral Center of Pressure trajectories of ten healthy young subjects using a force platform, and compare them with estimated measurements derived from accelerometer signals collected from three body locations (upper trunk, waist, and lower thigh) using three machine learning algorithms (Neural Network, Genetic Algorithm, and Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System). Error ratios and correlation coefficients corresponding to body locations were compared via one-way repeated-measures ANOVA. The ratios and coefficients corresponding to the three algorithms were also compared using the same approach.

FINDINGS

Estimated Anterior/Posterior trajectories indicated that measurements collected from the waist provided the lowest margins of error (8.1-8.4% v. 12.1-13.4%, P ≤ .001) and the highest correlation (.95 v. .82-.86, P ≤ .032). Estimated Medial/Lateral trajectories indicated that measurements collected from both the waist and thigh, as compared to the upper trunk, provided lower margins of error (7.0-7.3% v. 8.5-10.8%). In general, the waist is the better accelerometer attachment location.

INTERPRETATION

The results of our study corroborate our deduction that the high correlation between Center of Pressure and body's Center of Mass provides the rationale to place the single accelerometer close to the waist for Center of Pressure estimations. This study also supports the feasibility of using one single accelerometer programmed with algorithms for similar clinical applications.