• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危手术患者指的是哪些人?

Who is a high-risk surgical patient?

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Dec;24(6):547-553. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000556.

DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000556
PMID:30308542
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Timely identification of high-risk surgical candidates facilitate surgical decision-making and allows appropriate tailoring of perioperative management strategies. This review aims to summarize the recent advances in perioperative risk stratification.

RECENT FINDINGS

Use of indices which include various combinations of preoperative and postoperative variables remain the most commonly used risk-stratification strategy. Incorporation of biomarkers (troponin and natriuretic peptides), comprehensive objective assessment of functional capacity, and frailty into the current framework enhance perioperative risk estimation. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters can provide further signals towards identifying patients at risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. Implementation of machine-learning algorithms is showing promising results in real-time forecasting of perioperative outcomes.

SUMMARY

Perioperative risk estimation is multidimensional including validated indices, biomarkers, functional capacity estimation, and intraoperative hemodynamics. Identification and implementation of targeted strategies which mitigate predicted risk remains a greater challenge.

摘要

目的综述

及时识别高危手术患者有助于手术决策,并能适当调整围手术期管理策略。本文旨在总结围手术期风险分层的最新进展。

最近的发现

目前最常用的风险分层策略仍然是使用包含术前和术后各种变量组合的指数。将生物标志物(肌钙蛋白和利钠肽)、对功能能力的全面客观评估以及脆弱性纳入现有框架可提高围手术期风险评估。术中血流动力学参数可提供进一步的信号,以识别术后不良结局风险增加的患者。机器学习算法的实施在实时预测围手术期结局方面显示出良好的效果。

总结

围手术期风险评估是多维度的,包括经过验证的指数、生物标志物、功能能力评估和术中血流动力学。确定和实施可降低预测风险的针对性策略仍然是一个更大的挑战。

相似文献

1
Who is a high-risk surgical patient?高危手术患者指的是哪些人?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Dec;24(6):547-553. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000556.
2
How can we identify the high-risk patient?我们如何识别高危患者?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Aug;21(4):328-35. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000216.
3
Anesthesia in adults with congenital heart disease.成人先天性心脏病的麻醉
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):418-425. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000468.
4
[Cardiac biomarkers in perioperative risk stratification].[围手术期风险分层中的心脏生物标志物]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2011 Feb;30(2):126-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2010.11.025. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
5
Chasing myocardial outcomes: perioperative myocardial infarction and cardiac troponin.追寻心肌结局:围手术期心肌梗死与心肌肌钙蛋白
Can J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;63(2):227-32. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0539-0. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
6
Patient with chronic renal failure undergoing surgery.正在接受手术的慢性肾衰竭患者。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jun;29(3):413-20. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000329.
7
Perioperative management of obese patient.肥胖患者的围手术期管理。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Dec;24(6):560-567. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000555.
8
Perioperative risk.围手术期风险。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2017 Nov 2;78(11):616-621. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.11.616.
9
Assessment of preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide in adult surgeries: is it useful?成人手术中术前B型利钠肽的评估:它有用吗?
Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1005-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318210c739.
10
Surgical Apgar score is associated with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery.手术中 Apgar 评分与非心脏手术后的心肌损伤相关。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
En-bloc kidney transplants from very small pediatric donors: a propensity score matched analysis.来自极小儿科供体的整块肾移植:倾向评分匹配分析
Front Pediatr. 2025 Apr 25;13:1570489. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1570489. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictive value of the American college of surgeons "surgical risk calculator" (ACS-NSQIP SRC) for plastic and reconstructive surgery: a validation study from an academic tertiary referral center in Germany.美国外科医师学会“手术风险计算器”(ACS-NSQIP SRC)在整形与重建手术中的预测价值:来自德国一家学术性三级转诊中心的验证研究
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Apr 30;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00438-y.
3
Validation and Recalibration of a Model for Predicting Surgical-Site Infection After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
盆腔器官脱垂手术后手术部位感染预测模型的验证与重新校准
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb;36(2):431-438. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-06025-6. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
4
An interrater reliability analysis of preoperative mortality risk calculators used for elective high-risk noncardiac surgical patients shows poor to moderate reliability.用于择期高危非心脏手术患者的术前死亡率计算器的组内可靠性分析显示,可靠性差至中等。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02771-8.
5
Role of Crystalloids in the Perioperative Setting: From Basics to Clinical Applications and Enhanced Recovery Protocols.晶体液在围手术期的作用:从基础到临床应用及加速康复方案
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 12;12(18):5930. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185930.
6
Machine learning in perioperative medicine: a systematic review.围手术期医学中的机器学习:一项系统综述。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 Jan 15;2(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00033-y.
7
Major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality after emergency general surgery among kidney failure patients.肾衰竭患者接受急诊普通外科手术后的主要心血管不良事件和全因死亡率。
BJS Open. 2022 Nov 2;6(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac130.
8
Results of emergency colectomy in nonagenarians and octogenarians previously labeled as prohibitive surgical risk.先前被列为手术高风险人群的九旬和八旬老人急诊结肠切除术的结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Dec;48(6):4927-4933. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02030-w. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
9
Effect of modifying high-risk factors and prehabilitation on the outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery: controlled before and after study.高危因素调整和康复治疗对结直肠癌手术结果的影响:对照前后研究。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac029.
10
How to identify a high-risk surgical patient?如何识别高风险手术患者?
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 May-Jun;72(3):313-315. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 21.