• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Unplanned 30-Day Hospital Readmissions of Symptomatic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissection.

作者信息

Mehta Tapan, Patel Smit, Male Shailesh, Parikh Romil, Mehta Kathan, Lakshminarayan Kamakshi, Tummala Ramachandra, Ezzeddine Mustapha

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Stroke. 2018 Sep;20(3):407-410. doi: 10.5853/jos.2018.02236. Epub 2018 Sep 30.

DOI:10.5853/jos.2018.02236
PMID:30309236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6186927/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9d4/6186927/7e7a14d9462f/jos-2018-02236f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9d4/6186927/7e7a14d9462f/jos-2018-02236f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9d4/6186927/7e7a14d9462f/jos-2018-02236f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Unplanned 30-Day Hospital Readmissions of Symptomatic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissection.有症状的颈动脉和椎动脉夹层的非计划30天再入院情况。
J Stroke. 2018 Sep;20(3):407-410. doi: 10.5853/jos.2018.02236. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
2
A 5-year retrospective cohort study of unplanned readmissions in an Australian tertiary paediatric hospital.一项针对澳大利亚一家三级儿科医院非计划再次入院情况的5年回顾性队列研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jan;43(6):662-671. doi: 10.1071/AH18123.
3
Nonspecific Chest Pain and 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions in the United States (From the Nationwide Readmission Database).美国的非特异性胸痛与 30 天内非计划性再入院（来自全国再入院数据库）。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 15;123(8):1343-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
4
A Validated Method for Identifying Unplanned Pediatric Readmission.一种用于识别儿童意外再入院的验证方法。
J Pediatr. 2016 Mar;170:105-12.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.11.051. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
5
Predictors of Cervical Vertebral and Carotid Artery Dissection During Blunt Trauma: Experience From a Level 1 Trauma Center.钝性创伤后颈椎和颈动脉夹层的预测因素：来自 1 级创伤中心的经验。
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:e315-e320. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.191. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Analysis of 30-day readmission after aortoiliac and infrainguinal revascularization using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set.利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据集对主髂动脉和股腘动脉血管重建术后30天再入院情况进行分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov;60(5):1266-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.051. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
7
Anticoagulation vs Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients with Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Study of 370 Patients and Literature Review.颈动脉和椎动脉夹层患者的抗凝治疗与抗血小板治疗：370例患者的研究及文献综述
Neurosurgery. 2017 Mar 1;80(3):368-379. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw086.
8
Carotid and vertebral artery dissection: Magnetic Resonance findings in 15 cases.颈动脉和椎动脉夹层：15例磁共振成像表现
Radiol Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;104(5-6):466-71.
9
Spontaneous bilateral internal carotid and vertebral artery dissections with dominant-hemisphere circulation maintained by external carotid artery-ophthalmic artery anastomoses.自发性双侧颈内动脉和椎动脉夹层，优势半球循环由颈外动脉-眼动脉吻合维持。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Feb 1;46(2):E6. doi: 10.3171/2018.11.FOCUS18443.
10
Comparison of 30-day readmission rates and risk factors between carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的30天再入院率及危险因素比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1432-1444.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.097. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes of Stenting on Non-Acute Phase Extracranial Supra-Aortic Dissections.非急性期颅外主动脉弓上夹层支架置入术的长期疗效
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 May;65(3):422-429. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0198. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Recanalization of cervicocephalic artery dissection.颈脑动脉夹层再通
Brain Circ. 2020 Sep 30;6(3):175-180. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_19_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
3
Treatment of Extracranial Arterial Dissection: the Roles of Antiplatelet Agents, Anticoagulants, and Stenting.颅外动脉夹层的治疗：抗血小板药物、抗凝剂及支架置入的作用

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection.颅内动脉夹层的流行病学、病理生理学、诊断和治疗。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jun;14(6):640-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00009-5.
2
Antiplatelet treatment compared with anticoagulation treatment for cervical artery dissection (CADISS): a randomised trial.抗血小板治疗与抗凝治疗在颈内动脉夹层（CADISS）中的对比：一项随机试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Apr;14(4):361-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70018-9. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
3
Antiplatelets vs anticoagulation for dissection: CADISS nonrandomized arm and meta-analysis.
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2019 Sep 26;21(10):48. doi: 10.1007/s11940-019-0589-7.
抗血小板与抗凝治疗夹层：CADISS 非随机分组研究及其荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2012 Aug 14;79(7):686-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318264e36b. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
4
Aspirin versus anticoagulation in intra- and extracranial vertebral artery dissection.颅内和颅外椎动脉夹层中阿司匹林与抗凝治疗的比较。
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Jan;20(1):167-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03825.x. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Cervical artery dissection: risk factors, treatment, and outcome; a 5-year experience from a tertiary care center.颈动脉夹层：危险因素、治疗和转归；一家三级医疗中心的 5 年经验。
Int J Neurosci. 2012 Jan;122(1):40-4. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2011.622453. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
6
Frequency and determinants for hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarction.脑梗死出血性转化的频率及影响因素。
Neuroepidemiology. 2009;33(3):261-5. doi: 10.1159/000229781. Epub 2009 Jul 27.