Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Division of Radiology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:e315-e320. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.191. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
The current data available to identify the factors associated with vertebral and carotid artery dissection in the trauma setting are conflicting, and further research is needed to accurately assess these predictors.
The data from 950 patients who had undergone neck computed tomography angiography (CTA) at a level 1 trauma center were analyzed. Of the 950 patients, 435 were included who had undergone neck CTA for blunt traumatic injuries. The mechanism of injury was classified as high or low impact according to the hospital criteria for trauma. Positive neurological signs included altered mental status (Glasgow coma scale score ≤15 than baseline) or focal neurological deficits. Fractures and dissections were radiologically confirmed. Multivariable logistic regression software was used to analyze the data.
Of the 435 patients, 236 (54.25%) had experienced high-impact injuries, 124 (28.51%) had vertebral fractures (including 63 displaced fractures [50.81%]), and 180 (41.38%) had had positive neurological signs on presentation. Of the 435 patients, cervical carotid artery injury had been diagnosed in 9 (2.07%), and 18 patients (4.14%) had had a cervical vertebral artery injury (VAI). Carotid artery injuries did not have significant associations with positive neurological signs, age, sex, mechanism of injury, or vertebral fracture (P > 0.05 for all). Positive neurological signs and vertebral fractures were significant predictors for VAI (odds ratio, 3.19; P < 0.05; odds ratio, 9.81; P < 0.001, respectively). Age, sex, mechanism of injury, and displacement of the vertebral fracture were not significant predictors for VAI (P > 0.05 for all).
Positive neurological signs and the presence of cervical vertebral fractures are significant predictors for VAI. All trauma patients with cervical spine fractures and/or positive neurological findings should be considered for surveillance imaging with neck CTA and/or magnetic resonance angiography for vascular injury screening.
目前可用的数据来确定创伤环境中与椎动脉和颈动脉夹层相关的因素存在冲突,需要进一步研究以准确评估这些预测因素。
对在一级创伤中心进行颈部计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的 950 名患者的数据进行了分析。在这 950 名患者中,有 435 名患者因钝性创伤性损伤接受了颈部 CTA。根据医院创伤标准,将损伤机制分为高冲击或低冲击。阳性神经体征包括意识状态改变(格拉斯哥昏迷评分比基线≤15)或局灶性神经功能缺损。骨折和夹层通过影像学证实。使用多变量逻辑回归软件分析数据。
在 435 名患者中,236 名(54.25%)经历了高冲击损伤,124 名(28.51%)有椎体骨折(包括 63 例移位骨折[50.81%]),180 名(41.38%)在就诊时有阳性神经体征。在 435 名患者中,诊断为颈内动脉损伤 9 例(2.07%),颈椎动脉损伤 18 例(4.14%)。颈动脉损伤与阳性神经体征、年龄、性别、损伤机制或椎体骨折无显著相关性(所有 P 值>0.05)。阳性神经体征和椎体骨折是 VAI 的显著预测因素(优势比,3.19;P<0.05;优势比,9.81;P<0.001)。年龄、性别、损伤机制和椎体骨折的移位均不是 VAI 的显著预测因素(所有 P 值>0.05)。
阳性神经体征和颈椎骨折是 VAI 的显著预测因素。所有有颈椎骨折和/或阳性神经表现的创伤患者都应考虑进行颈部 CTA 和/或磁共振血管造影的血管损伤筛查。