Suppr超能文献

在高危前列腺癌的确定性治疗中添加化疗。

The addition of chemotherapy in the definitive management of high risk prostate cancer.

作者信息

Ferris Matthew J, Liu Yuan, Ao Jingning, Zhong Jim, Abugideiri Mustafa, Gillespie Theresa W, Carthon Bradley C, Bilen Mehmet A, Kucuk Omer, Jani Ashesh B

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2018 Nov;36(11):475-487. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.07.020. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

Abstract

In attempt to improve long-term disease control outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer, numerous clinical trials have tested the addition of chemotherapy (CTX)-either adjuvant or neoadjuvant-to definitive local therapy, either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). Neoadjuvant trials generally confirm safety, feasibility, and pre-RP PSA reduction, but rates of pathologic complete response are rare, and no indications for neoadjuvant CTX have been firmly established. Adjuvant regimens have included CTX alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Here we provide a review of the relevant literature, and also quantify utilization of CTX in the definitive management of localized high-risk prostate cancer by querying the National Cancer Data Base. Between 2004 and 2013, 177 patients (of 29,659 total) treated with definitive RT, and 995 (of 367,570 total) treated with RP had CTX incorporated into their treatment regimens. Low numbers of RT + CTX patients precluded further analysis of this population, but we investigated the impact of CTX on overall survival (OS) for patients treated with RP +/- CTX. Disease-free survival or biochemical-recurrence-free survival are not available through the National Cancer Data Base. Propensity-score matching was conducted as patients treated with CTX were a higher-risk group. For nonmatched groups, OS at 5-years was 89.6% for the CTX group vs. 95.6%, for the no-CTX group (P < 0.01). The difference in OS between CTX and no-CTX groups did not persist after propensity-score matching, with 5-year OS 89.6% vs. 90.9%, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.99; P = 0.88). In summary, CTX was not shown to improve OS in this retrospective study. Multimodal regimens-such as RP followed by ADT, RT, and CTX; or RT in conjunction with ADT followed by CTX-have shown promise, but long-term follow-up of randomized data is required.

摘要

为了改善高危前列腺癌的长期疾病控制效果,众多临床试验对在根治性局部治疗(根治性前列腺切除术[RP]或放射治疗[RT])中添加化疗(CTX)进行了测试,包括辅助化疗或新辅助化疗。新辅助化疗试验通常证实了其安全性、可行性以及RP前PSA的降低,但病理完全缓解率很低,且新辅助CTX的适应证尚未得到明确确立。辅助治疗方案包括单独使用CTX或与雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)联合使用。在此,我们对相关文献进行综述,并通过查询国家癌症数据库,对CTX在局限性高危前列腺癌的根治性治疗中的应用情况进行量化。2004年至2013年期间,在接受根治性RT治疗的29,659例患者中有177例(共)、接受RP治疗的367,570例患者中有995例(共)将CTX纳入其治疗方案。接受RT + CTX治疗的患者数量较少,无法对该人群进行进一步分析,但我们研究了CTX对接受RP +/ - CTX治疗患者的总生存期(OS)的影响。通过国家癌症数据库无法获得无病生存期或无生化复发生存期。由于接受CTX治疗的患者是高危组,因此进行了倾向评分匹配。对于未匹配组,CTX组5年OS为89.6%,无CTX组为95.6%(P < 0.01)。倾向评分匹配后,CTX组和无CTX组之间的OS差异不再存在,5年OS分别为89.6%和90.9%(风险比0.99;P = 0.88)。总之,在这项回顾性研究中,未显示CTX能改善OS。多模式治疗方案,如RP后联合ADT、RT和CTX;或RT联合ADT后再进行CTX,已显示出前景,但需要对随机数据进行长期随访。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2b6/6214780/6a2bb675fc73/nihms1502978f1.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验