Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;34(1):87-96. doi: 10.1002/gps.4991. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
To determine the association of napping intention, frequency, and duration with cognition in a nationally-representative sample of US older adults.
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years from Rounds 3 or 4 (2013-2014) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (N = 2549). Participants reported past-month napping intention (intentional/unintentional), napping frequency (rarely/never [non-nappers], some days [infrequent nappers], most days/every day [frequent nappers]), and average nap duration (we categorized as ≤30 minutes [short]; 31-60 minutes [moderate]; and > 60 minutes [long]). Cognitive outcomes were performance on immediate and delayed word recall tests (IWR and DWR, respectively), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and self-rated memory (score: 1[excellent]-5[very poor]).
After adjustment for potential confounders, unintentional nappers had poorer immediate word recall test performance than non-nappers (B = -0.23, P < 0.01) and intentional nappers (B = -0.26, P < 0.01). After further adjustment for daytime sleepiness, frequent nappers reported poorer self-rated memory than non-nappers (B = 0.14, P < 0.05). Compared with short nappers, long nappers had poorer IWR (B = -0.26, P < 0.05) and CDT scores (B = -0.17, P < 0.05). Except for the association of nap duration with IWR and CDT, these associations remained after excluding participants with dementia and/or proxy respondents. Among participants undiagnosed with dementia or proxies, moderate-duration naps were associated with better DWR than short naps (B = 0.24, P < 0.05). Neither napping intentionality nor frequency was associated with CDT performance.
Among older adults, distinct aspects of napping are associated with cognitive performance. Prospective research, with objective measures of napping, is needed to elucidate the link between napping and cognitive trajectories.
在一项具有全国代表性的美国老年人群体样本中,确定打盹意愿、频率和持续时间与认知之间的关联。
我们对参加第 3 轮或第 4 轮(2013-2014 年)国家健康老龄化趋势研究(N = 2549)的年龄在 65 岁及以上的居住在社区的医疗保险受益人进行了横断面分析。参与者报告了过去一个月打盹的意图(有意/无意)、打盹的频率(很少/从不[非打盹者]、有些日子[不频繁打盹者]、大多数日子/每天[频繁打盹者])和平均打盹持续时间(我们分为≤30 分钟[短];31-60 分钟[中];和>60 分钟[长])。认知结果是即时和延迟单词回忆测试(IWR 和 DWR)、画钟测试(CDT)和自我评估记忆(分数:1[优秀]-5[非常差])的表现。
在调整了潜在混杂因素后,无意打盹者的即时单词回忆测试表现比非打盹者(B =-0.23,P <0.01)和有意打盹者(B =-0.26,P <0.01)差。在进一步调整了白天嗜睡后,频繁打盹者报告的自我评估记忆比非打盹者差(B =0.14,P <0.05)。与短打盹者相比,长打盹者的 IWR(B =-0.26,P <0.05)和 CDT 评分(B =-0.17,P <0.05)较差。除了打盹持续时间与 IWR 和 CDT 的关联外,在排除痴呆症患者和/或代理受访者后,这些关联仍然存在。在未被诊断为痴呆症或代理人的参与者中,与短打盹相比,中等时长的打盹与更好的 DWR 相关(B =0.24,P <0.05)。打盹的有意性或频率都与 CDT 表现无关。
在老年人中,打盹的不同方面与认知表现有关。需要进行前瞻性研究,使用打盹的客观测量方法,阐明打盹与认知轨迹之间的联系。