Salgado-López Laura, de Quintana-Schmidt Cristian, Belvis Nieto Robert, Roig Arnall Carles, Rodríguez Rodriguez Rodrigo, Álvarez Holzapfel María Jesús, Molet-Teixidó Joan
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e262-e269. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
In the literature, there are only short series of radiofrequency of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) to treat chronic refractory cluster headache (CCHr) with variable results. Furthermore, there is no consensus on which methodology to use: radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or pulsed radiofrequency (PRF).
We conducted a prospective analysis of 37 patients with CCHr who underwent RFA or PRF of the SPG in our center between 2004 and 2015.
The mean age of the patients was 40 years (range, 26-59 years). PRF was performed in 24 patients, and RFA was performed in 13 patients. A total of 5 patients (13.5%) experienced complete clinical relief of both pain and parasympathetic symptoms, 21 patients (56.8%) had partial and transient relief, and 11 patients (29.7%) did not improve. There was no evidence of significant superiority of one radiofrequency modality over the other (P = 0.48). There were no complications associated with the technique. The passage of time tended to decrease the efficacy of both techniques (P < 0.001). The mean follow-up was 68.1 months (range, 15-148 months). To our knowledge, this is the series with the largest number of patients and the longest follow-up period published in the literature.
Radiofrequency of the SPG is a safe, fast, and partially effective method for the treatment of CCHr. Given its low rate of complications and its low economic cost, we think it should be one of the first invasive treatment options, prior to techniques with greater morbidity and mortality, such as neuromodulation.
在文献中,仅有关于蝶腭神经节(SPG)射频治疗慢性难治性丛集性头痛(CCHr)的少量系列报道,且结果各异。此外,对于采用哪种方法(射频消融[RFA]还是脉冲射频[PRF])尚无共识。
我们对2004年至2015年间在本中心接受SPG的RFA或PRF治疗的37例CCHr患者进行了前瞻性分析。
患者的平均年龄为40岁(范围26 - 59岁)。24例患者接受了PRF治疗,13例患者接受了RFA治疗。共有5例患者(13.5%)疼痛和副交感神经症状完全缓解,21例患者(56.8%)部分缓解且为短暂性,11例患者(29.7%)无改善。没有证据表明一种射频方式比另一种具有显著优势(P = 0.48)。该技术无相关并发症。随着时间推移,两种技术的疗效均有下降趋势(P < 0.001)。平均随访时间为68.1个月(范围15 - 148个月)。据我们所知,这是文献中报道的患者数量最多且随访期最长的系列研究。
SPG射频治疗是一种安全、快速且部分有效的CCHr治疗方法。鉴于其低并发症发生率和低经济成本,我们认为在进行诸如神经调节等具有更高发病率和死亡率的技术之前,它应是首批侵入性治疗选择之一。