• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 ED 患者高血糖两种血糖出院目标,一项随机试验。

Comparison of two glycemic discharge goals in ED patients with hyperglycemia, a randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1295-1300. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.053. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.053
PMID:30316635
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Hyperglycemia is commonly encountered in the ED; the importance of glucose reduction in patients well enough to be discharged is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized trial of ED patients with hyperglycemia with a glucose value 400-600 mg/dL who were discharged from the ED, excluding those with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned to a discharge glucose goal, <350 mg/dL (moderate control) or < 600 mg/dL (loose control). The primary outcome was ED length of stay.

RESULTS

Among 110 enrolled patients, 57 were assigned to moderate and 53 to loose glycemic control. Median (IQR) length of stay was 211 min (177-288 min) for the moderate group and 216 min (151-269 min) for the loose group (difference, 17 min [95% CI -15 to 49 min]). ED length of stay for those with an actual discharge glucose <350 mg/dL was 29 min longer (95% CI -1 to 59 min). Repeat ED visits for hyperglycemia (7% vs 6%), hospitalization for hyperglycemia (0% vs 2%), and hospitalization for any reason (4% vs 8%) did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

In the intention-to-treat analysis, ED length of stay and 7-day outcomes were not significantly different whether moderate or loose glycemic control was pursued. However, the length of stay for those with discharge glucose <350 mg/dL was approximately 29 min longer. ED glycemic control did not appear to be associated negative short-term outcomes. Glucose reduction in well-appearing ED patients may consume time and resources without conferring short- or long-term benefits.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.govNCT02478190.

摘要

研究目的

急诊科(ED)经常会出现高血糖症;对于那些身体状况足以出院的患者,血糖降低的重要性尚不清楚。

方法

我们对 ED 中血糖值为 400-600mg/dL 且已出院的高血糖症患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机试验,排除了 1 型糖尿病患者。患者被随机分配到出院时的血糖目标值,<350mg/dL(中等控制)或<600mg/dL(宽松控制)。主要结局是 ED 住院时间。

结果

在 110 名入组患者中,57 名被分配到中等血糖控制组,53 名被分配到宽松血糖控制组。中等组的中位(IQR)住院时间为 211 分钟(177-288 分钟),宽松组为 216 分钟(151-269 分钟)(差异为 17 分钟[95%CI-15 至 49 分钟])。实际出院血糖<350mg/dL 的患者 ED 住院时间延长 29 分钟(95%CI-1 至 59 分钟)。因高血糖再次就诊 ED(7%比 6%)、因高血糖住院(0%比 2%)和因任何原因住院(4%比 8%)在两组间无显著差异。

结论

在意向治疗分析中,无论是采用中等还是宽松的血糖控制,ED 住院时间和 7 天结局均无显著差异。然而,出院时血糖<350mg/dL 的患者的住院时间延长了约 29 分钟。ED 血糖控制似乎与短期不良结局无关。在表现良好的 ED 患者中降低血糖可能会消耗时间和资源,而不会带来短期或长期益处。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.govNCT02478190。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two glycemic discharge goals in ED patients with hyperglycemia, a randomized trial.比较 ED 患者高血糖两种血糖出院目标,一项随机试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1295-1300. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.053. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
2
Discharge Glucose Is Not Associated With Short-Term Adverse Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Moderate to Severe Hyperglycemia.出院时血糖水平与急诊科中重度高血糖患者的短期不良结局无关。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;68(6):697-705.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.057. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
3
The Association of Emergency Department Treatments for Hyperglycemia with Glucose Reduction and Emergency Department Length of Stay.急诊科高血糖治疗与血糖降低及急诊科住院时间的关联
J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):791-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.068. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
4
Treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia beginning in the emergency department: a randomized trial using insulins aspart and detemir compared with usual care.在急诊科开始治疗住院患者的高血糖:一项使用门冬胰岛素和地特胰岛素与常规治疗比较的随机试验。
J Hosp Med. 2011 May;6(5):279-84. doi: 10.1002/jhm.866.
5
Impact of a subcutaneous insulin protocol in the emergency department: Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI).皮下胰岛素方案在急诊科的影响:拉什急诊科高血糖干预(REDHI)。
J Emerg Med. 2011 May;40(5):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
6
Intravenous insulin for the management of non-emergent hyperglycemia in the emergency department.静脉内胰岛素用于急诊科非紧急高血糖症的管理。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.078. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
7
Effect of Full Correction Versus Partial Correction of Elevated Blood Glucose in the Emergency Department on Hospital Length of Stay.急诊科血糖完全纠正与部分纠正对住院时间的影响。
Am J Ther. 2016 May-Jun;23(3):e805-9. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000132.
8
Sentinel visits in emergency department patients with diabetes mellitus as a warning sign for hyperglycemic emergencies.急诊科糖尿病患者的哨点就诊作为高血糖急症的警示信号。
CJEM. 2018 Mar;20(2):230-237. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.338. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
9
Hyperglycemia in emergency patients--prevalence and consequences: results of the GLUCEMERGE analysis.急诊患者高血糖——患病率及后果:GLUCEMERGE分析结果
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(3):181-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000199.
10
Limited communication and management of emergency department hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients.住院患者急诊科高血糖的沟通与管理有限。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Jan;4(1):45-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.400.

引用本文的文献

1
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.美国临床内分泌学会临床实践指南:制定糖尿病综合护理计划-2022 更新版。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Oct;28(10):923-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
24-hr observation unit is safe location for rapid glucose control in uncomplicated severe hyperglycaemia.24 小时观察单位是复杂严重高血糖症快速血糖控制的安全场所。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 May 30;21(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00460-0.