Suppr超能文献

药学服务干预对糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Effect of pharmaceutical care interventions on glycemic control in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Jeong Sohyun, Lee Minhee, Ji Eunhee

机构信息

College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea,

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Sep 28;14:1813-1829. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S169748. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Diabetes is a chronic lifelong condition, and adherence to medications and self-monitoring of blood glucose are challenging for diabetic patients. The dramatic increase in the prevalence of diabetes is largely due to the incidence of type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIc) besides high-income countries (HIc). We aimed to evaluate whether pharmacist care (PC) service model in LMIc and HIc could improve clinical outcomes in diabetic patients by performing a meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and ProQuest Dissertations Unlimited Published Literature database were searched to find publications pertaining to pharmacist-led intervention in patients with diabetes. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) randomized controlled trials, 2) confirmed diabetic patients (type 1 or type 2), 3) pharmaceutical care intervention by clinical pharmacist or/and multidisciplinary team, and 4) reporting HbA1c at baseline and end of study or the mean change in these values.

RESULTS

A total of 37 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The overall result was significant and in favor of PC intervention on HbA1c change (standard difference in mean values [SDM]: 0.379, 95% CI: 0.208-0.550, <0.001). The stratified meta-analysis showed that PC was significant in both HIc (n=20; SDM: 0.351, 95% CI: 0.207-0.495) and LMIc (n=15; SDM: 0.426, 95% CI: 0.071-0.780). More than 6 months is needed to obtain adequate effects on clinical diabetes parameters.

CONCLUSION

Our study presented that an adequate duration of pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care was effective in improving HbA1c in patients with diabetes in both LMIc and HIc.

摘要

目的

糖尿病是一种慢性终身疾病,糖尿病患者坚持服药和自我血糖监测具有挑战性。糖尿病患病率的急剧上升在很大程度上是由于除高收入国家(HIC)外,低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)2型糖尿病的发病率所致。我们旨在通过进行荟萃分析来评估LMIC和HIC的药剂师护理(PC)服务模式是否能改善糖尿病患者的临床结局。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase和ProQuest Dissertations Unlimited已发表文献数据库,以查找有关药剂师主导的糖尿病患者干预的出版物。纳入标准如下:1)随机对照试验,2)确诊的糖尿病患者(1型或2型),3)临床药剂师或/和多学科团队的药学护理干预,4)报告基线和研究结束时的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)或这些值的平均变化。

结果

共有37篇文章纳入荟萃分析。总体结果显著,支持PC干预对HbA1c变化的影响(均值标准差差异[SDM]:0.379,95%置信区间:0.208 - 0.550,<0.001)。分层荟萃分析表明,PC在HIC(n = 20;SDM:0.351,95%置信区间:0.207 - 0.495)和LMIC(n = 15;SDM:0.426,95%置信区间:0.071 - 0.780)中均具有显著意义。需要超过6个月的时间才能对临床糖尿病参数产生充分影响。

结论

我们的研究表明,在LMIC和HIC中,由药剂师主导的药学护理持续足够长的时间对改善糖尿病患者的HbA1c有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730f/6168065/cba44f8ca85c/tcrm-14-1813Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验