Muscat Katharine E, Padalino Barbara, Hartley Carol A, Ficorilli Nino, Celi Pietro, Knight Peter, Raidal Sharanne, Gilkerson James R, Muscatello Gary
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Sep 25;5:224. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00224. eCollection 2018.
The risk of respiratory disease in the transported horse can increase as a consequence of immunosuppression and stress associated primarily with opportunistic bacterial proliferation and viral reactivation. This study examines the ecology of equid herpesviruses (EHV) in these horses, exploring reactivation and changes in infection and shedding associated with transport, and any potential contributions to transport-related respiratory disease. Twelve horses were subjected to an 8-h road-transport event. Antibodies to EHV-1 and EHV-4 were detected by ELISA in serum collected prior to, immediately after and 2 weeks post transport. Respiratory tract endoscopy and tracheal washes were collected prior to and 5 days after transportation. Nasal swabs collected prior to, immediately after, 1 and 5 days following transport were screened for EHV-1,-2,-4,-5 using qPCR. Six horses had persistent neutrophilic airway infiltrates post transportation, indicative of subclinical respiratory disease. No horses were qPCR positive for either of the alphaherpesviruses (i.e., EHV-1/-4) nor did any seroconvert to either virus. Four out of nine horses positive for either EHV-2 or EHV-5 on qPCR prior to transport developed neutrophilic airway inflammation. Five horses showed increasingly positive readings on qPCR (i.e., reduced Cq) for EHV-2 after transportation and seven out of eleven horses positive for EHV-2 after transport shared strains of high sequence similarity with other horses in the study. One EHV-2 virus detected in one horse after transport was genetically different which may be due to reactivation. The clinical significance of EHV-2 and EHV-5 remains in question. However these results indicate that transportation may lead to increased shedding, transmission and reactivation of EHV-2 and EHV-5 but not EHV-1/-4. Unlike previous work focusing on the role of alphaherpesviruses, this research suggests that investigation of the gammaherpesviruses (i.e., EHV-2/-5) in transport-related disease should not be dismissed, particularly given that these viruses can encode suppressive immunomodulators that may affect host health.
运输过程中的马匹患呼吸道疾病的风险可能会因免疫抑制和应激反应而增加,这些主要与机会性细菌增殖和病毒再激活有关。本研究调查了这些马匹中马疱疹病毒(EHV)的生态情况,探讨了与运输相关的再激活、感染和排毒变化,以及对运输相关呼吸道疾病的任何潜在影响。12匹马经历了8小时的公路运输。通过ELISA在运输前、运输后立即以及运输后2周采集的血清中检测EHV-1和EHV-4抗体。在运输前和运输后5天进行呼吸道内窥镜检查并收集气管冲洗液。在运输前、运输后立即、运输后1天和5天采集的鼻拭子,使用qPCR检测EHV-1、-2、-4、-5。6匹马在运输后出现持续性嗜中性粒细胞气道浸润,提示亚临床呼吸道疾病。没有马的α疱疹病毒(即EHV-1/-4)qPCR检测呈阳性,也没有马对任何一种病毒发生血清转化。在运输前qPCR检测EHV-2或EHV-5呈阳性的9匹马中,有4匹出现嗜中性粒细胞气道炎症。5匹马在运输后EHV-2的qPCR读数越来越高(即Cq值降低),运输后EHV-2呈阳性的11匹马中有7匹与研究中的其他马匹具有高度序列相似性的毒株。运输后在一匹马中检测到的一种EHV-2病毒在基因上有所不同,这可能是由于再激活所致。EHV-2和EHV-5的临床意义仍不确定。然而,这些结果表明运输可能导致EHV-2和EHV-5的排毒增加、传播和再激活,但不会导致EHV-1/-4出现这种情况。与之前关注α疱疹病毒作用的研究不同,本研究表明,在运输相关疾病中对γ疱疹病毒(即EHV-2/-5)的研究不应被忽视,特别是考虑到这些病毒可以编码可能影响宿主健康的抑制性免疫调节剂。