Wurm Michael, Neumann Anja, Wasem Jürgen, Biermann-Stallwitz Janine
Lehrstuhl für Medizinmanagement, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen.
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Mar;81(3):e43-e57. doi: 10.1055/a-0668-5621. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
OBJECTIVE: In Germany there are 3,100 new HIV infections per year (2016), mainly homosexual men and intravenous drug users. According to experts from Robert Koch Institute, about 30 % of people with HIV are diagnosed late, well past the optimal moment to start the antiretroviral therapy. The high rate of late presenters seems to be a strong argument for an intensification of voluntary counseling and testing services. The main objective of this literature analysis was to describe the barriers to HIV testing. METHODS: A systematic literature search was done to evaluate current knowledge on theory and practice regarding barriers that keep vulnerable groups from getting tested. The analysis includes all publications between 2000 and 2014 from western industrial states. RESULTS: 132 publications have been included in a full text analysis. Most of these publications present the result of surveys of clients attending counseling and testing services. Hence, we have a clear idea of the elements that are relevant for clients when they decide whether or where to get tested for HIV. First, the individual risk perception influences the decision on getting tested or not. The risk perception can be influenced through public relations and outreach services. All processes within the counseling and testing service should be adapted to assure confidentiality and anonymity. In addition, clients want to have counseling that is accepting and free of prejudices. These elements are therefore important since HIV is often associated with getting stigmatized. Similar concerns regarding stigmatization occur if clie nts have sexual preferences that can be considered as deviant. The clients' fear of stigmatization, judgment and social exclusion requires a high sensitivity for the situation of the clients and acceptance of their lifestyle. CONCLUSION: We have a clear insight into how clients decide on getting tested or not. The factor with the greatest influence in the decision-making process is the individual risk perception and anxiety regarding stigmatization. Stigmatization is suspected as a societal reaction to deviant sexual behavior or to being infected with HIV. Public relations should inform about risk factors and risk perception as well as on confidentiality and anonymity of the service. The use of social media and social networks is highly recommended. New approaches such as home testing could eliminate the concerns regarding confidentiality and anonymity.
目的:在德国,每年有3100例新的艾滋病毒感染病例(2016年),主要是男同性恋者和静脉注射吸毒者。据罗伯特·科赫研究所的专家称,约30%的艾滋病毒感染者被诊断时已为时过晚,远远超过开始抗逆转录病毒治疗的最佳时机。晚期就诊率居高不下似乎有力地支持了加强自愿咨询和检测服务。这项文献分析的主要目的是描述艾滋病毒检测的障碍。 方法:进行了系统的文献检索,以评估关于阻碍弱势群体进行检测的障碍的理论和实践方面的现有知识。分析涵盖了2000年至2014年来自西方工业国家的所有出版物。 结果:132篇出版物被纳入全文分析。这些出版物大多呈现了对接受咨询和检测服务的客户的调查结果。因此,当客户决定是否进行艾滋病毒检测或在何处检测时,我们清楚地了解了对他们而言相关的因素。首先,个人风险认知会影响是否进行检测的决定。风险认知可通过公关和外展服务加以影响。咨询和检测服务中的所有流程都应加以调整,以确保保密性和匿名性。此外,客户希望得到包容且无偏见的咨询。由于艾滋病毒常常与污名化相关联,所以这些因素很重要。如果客户有可被视为异常的性取向,也会出现类似的关于污名化的担忧。客户对污名化、评判和社会排斥的恐惧要求对客户的情况具有高度敏感性并接纳他们的生活方式。 结论:我们清楚地了解了客户如何决定是否进行检测。决策过程中影响最大的因素是个人风险认知以及对污名化的焦虑。污名化被认为是社会对异常性行为或感染艾滋病毒的一种反应。公关应宣传风险因素、风险认知以及服务的保密性和匿名性。强烈建议使用社交媒体和社交网络。诸如家庭检测等新方法可以消除对保密性和匿名性的担忧。
Gesundheitswesen. 2019-3
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014-10-16
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998-11-1
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017-12-4
Soc Work Public Health. 2019-7-7