1Center for Behavioral Teratology and Department of Psychology,San Diego State University,San Diego,California.
2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Emory University School of Medicine,Atlanta,Georgia.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Nov;24(10):1026-1037. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000772. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Caregivers of youth with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure report impaired communication, which can significantly impact quality of life. Using data collected as part of the Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (CIFASD), we examined whether cognitive variables predict communication ability of youth with histories of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.
Subjects (ages 10-16 years) comprised two groups: adolescents with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure (AE) and non-exposed controls (CON). Selected measures of executive function (NEPSY, Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System), working memory (CANTAB), and language were tested in the child, while parents completed communication ratings (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales - Second Edition). Separate multiple regression analyses determined which cognitive domains predicted communication ability. A final, global model of communication comprised the three cognitive models.
Spatial Working Memory and Inhibition significantly contributed to communication ability across groups. Twenty Questions performance related to communication ability in the CON group only while Word Generation performance related to communication ability in the AE group only. Effects remained significant in the global model, with the exception of Spatial Working Memory.
Both groups displayed a relation between communication and Spatial Working Memory and Inhibition. Stronger communication ability related to stronger verbal fluency in the AE group and Twenty Questions performance in the CON group. These findings suggest that alcohol-exposed adolescents may rely more heavily on learned verbal storage or fluency for daily communication while non-exposed adolescents may rely more heavily on abstract thinking and verbal efficiency. Interventions aimed at aspects of executive function may be most effective at improving communication ability of these individuals. (JINS, 2018, 24, 1026-1037).
有大量产前酒精暴露史的青少年的照料者报告说,他们的沟通能力受损,这会显著影响生活质量。本研究使用作为胎儿酒精谱系障碍合作倡议(CIFASD)一部分所收集的数据,考察认知变量是否可以预测有大量产前酒精暴露史的青少年的沟通能力。
研究对象(年龄 10-16 岁)分为两组:有大量产前酒精暴露史的青少年(AE)和未暴露对照组(CON)。对儿童进行了执行功能(NEPSY、Delis-Kaplan 执行功能系统)、工作记忆(CANTAB)和语言的选择测量,而父母则完成了沟通评定(第二版 Vineland 适应行为量表)。分别进行多元回归分析,以确定哪些认知领域可以预测沟通能力。沟通的最终综合模型由三个认知模型组成。
空间工作记忆和抑制在两组中均显著影响沟通能力。仅在 CON 组中,20 问测试成绩与沟通能力相关,而仅在 AE 组中,词语生成成绩与沟通能力相关。在全球模型中,除空间工作记忆外,其他效果仍然显著。
两组都显示出沟通与空间工作记忆和抑制之间的关系。AE 组的沟通能力与词语流畅性的关系更强,而 CON 组的沟通能力与 20 问测试成绩的关系更强。这些发现表明,酒精暴露的青少年可能更依赖习得的言语存储或流畅性进行日常沟通,而未暴露的青少年可能更依赖抽象思维和言语效率。针对执行功能方面的干预措施可能对提高这些个体的沟通能力最有效。(JINS,2018,24,1026-1037)。