• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科医疗保健环境中的家长赋权:观察性研究的系统评价。

Parent Empowerment in Pediatric Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.

University of Pittsburgh School of Social Work, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):199-212. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0336-2.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-018-0336-2
PMID:30328069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6397702/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parent empowerment is often an expressed goal in clinical pediatrics and in pediatric research, but the antecedents and consequences of parent empowerment are not well established.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize potential antecedents and consequences of parent empowerment in healthcare settings.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were (1) studies with results about parent empowerment in the context of children's healthcare or healthcare providers; and (2) qualitative studies, observational studies, and systematic reviews of such studies.

INFORMATION SOURCES

We searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (2006-2017) and reference lists.

INCLUDED STUDIES

Forty-four articles met the inclusion criteria.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

We identified six themes within consequences of empowerment: increased parent involvement in daily care, improved symptom management, enhanced informational needs and tools, increased involvement in care decisions, increased advocacy for child, and engagement in empowering others. Six themes summarizing antecedents of empowerment also emerged: parent-provider relationships, processes of care, experiences with medical care, experiences with community services, receiving informational/emotional support, and building personal capacity and narrative. We synthesized these findings into a conceptual model to guide future intervention development and evaluation.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF EVIDENCE

Non-English articles were excluded.

INTERPRETATION

Parent empowerment may enhance parent involvement in daily care and care decisions, improve child symptoms, enhance informational needs and skills, and increase advocacy and altruistic behaviors. Parent empowerment may be promoted by the parent-provider relationship and care processes, finding the right fit of medical and community services, and attention to the cognitive and emotional needs of parents.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION NO

PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017059478.

摘要

背景

家长赋权通常是临床儿科和儿科研究中表达的目标,但家长赋权的前提和后果尚不清楚。

目的

本系统评价的目的是综合医疗保健环境中家长赋权的潜在前提和后果。

纳入标准

(1)研究结果涉及儿童保健或医疗保健提供者背景下的家长赋权;(2)定性研究、观察性研究和此类研究的系统评价。

信息来源

我们检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar(2006-2017 年)数据库以及参考文献列表。

纳入的研究

符合纳入标准的文章有 44 篇。

结果综合

我们确定了赋权后果的六个主题:家长更多地参与日常护理、改善症状管理、增强信息需求和工具、更多地参与护理决策、更多地倡导孩子、以及授权他人。也总结了赋权的六个前提主题:家长-提供者关系、护理过程、医疗保健体验、社区服务体验、获得信息/情感支持、以及建立个人能力和叙述。我们将这些发现综合成一个概念模型,以指导未来的干预措施开发和评估。

证据的优势和局限性

排除了非英语文章。

解释

家长赋权可能会增强家长对日常护理和护理决策的参与度,改善孩子的症状,增强信息需求和技能,并增加倡导和利他行为。家长赋权可能通过家长-提供者关系和护理过程、寻找合适的医疗和社区服务、以及关注家长的认知和情感需求来促进。

临床注册编号

PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017059478。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2831/6397702/4ce49f605d83/nihms-1509816-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2831/6397702/96d2590d1741/nihms-1509816-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2831/6397702/4ce49f605d83/nihms-1509816-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2831/6397702/96d2590d1741/nihms-1509816-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2831/6397702/4ce49f605d83/nihms-1509816-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Parent Empowerment in Pediatric Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.儿科医疗保健环境中的家长赋权:观察性研究的系统评价。
Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):199-212. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0336-2.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The experiences of acute non-surgical pain of children who present to a healthcare facility for treatment: a systematic review protocol.前往医疗机构接受治疗的儿童急性非手术疼痛经历:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):12-20. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2466.
5
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
6
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
7
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) delivered in school settings: systematic reviews of quantitative and qualitative research.在学校环境中实施的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)非药物干预措施:定量和定性研究的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jun;19(45):1-470. doi: 10.3310/hta19450.
9
Experiences of acute pain in children who present to a healthcare facility for treatment: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.前往医疗机构接受治疗的儿童急性疼痛经历:定性证据的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jun;15(6):1612-1644. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003029.
10
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

引用本文的文献

1
A mobile-based, single-session intervention to empower parents of adolescents hospitalised for non-suicidal self-injury: A mixed-methods randomised controlled trial.一项基于手机的单阶段干预措施,旨在增强因非自杀性自伤而住院青少年的父母的能力:一项混合方法随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2025 Mar 29;40:100822. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100822. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Designing a Better Health System: Patient Perspectives on Gender Inclusive Care.设计更完善的医疗体系:患者对性别包容性护理的看法
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2025 Oct;64(9):1218-1226. doi: 10.1177/00099228251325448. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Parental Perceptions of Access to and Utilization of Services for Autistic Children in African American Families: An Exploratory Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Family empowerment and quality of life of parents raising children with Developmental Disabilities in 78 Japanese families.日本78个家庭中抚养发育障碍儿童的父母的家庭赋权与生活质量
Int J Nurs Sci. 2016 Dec 13;4(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.12.004. eCollection 2017 Jan 10.
2
Roles and Experiences of Parents in Necrotizing Enterocolitis: An International Survey of Parental Perspectives of Communication in the NICU.父母在坏死性小肠结肠炎中的角色与经历:一项关于新生儿重症监护病房沟通中父母观点的国际调查。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2017 Dec;17(6):489-498. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000438.
3
Solution-Focused Coaching in Pediatric Rehabilitation: Investigating Transformative Experiences and Outcomes for Families.
非裔美国家庭中父母对自闭症儿童服务获取与利用的认知:一项探索性研究
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02283-2.
4
Effect of fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on couple's preterm birth preparedness.父亲参与“父母早产准备(P3)项目”对夫妻早产准备情况的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Mar;132:108599. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108599. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
5
Influence of caregiver-nurse communication on quality of life and clinical outcomes of children with long-term ventilator dependence.照顾者-护士沟通对长期依赖呼吸机的儿童生活质量和临床结局的影响。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Nov-Dec;79:e100-e109. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.10.005. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
6
Effectiveness of caregiver educational materials for paediatric community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department: a qualitative study.儿科社区获得性肺炎在急诊科中使用照顾者教育材料的效果:一项定性研究。
CJEM. 2024 Nov;26(11):784-789. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00777-2. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
7
Healthcare providers' communication experience in the pediatric intensive care unit: a phenomenological study.医疗机构在儿科重症监护病房的沟通体验:一项现象学研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11394-1.
8
Parental political engagement and self-efficacy: An exploratory study.父母的政治参与度与自我效能感:一项探索性研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2024 Dec;74(3-4):227-235. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12761. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
9
Parents' Perception of the Benefit of Receiving a Patient Information Leaflet Prior to Attending a Craniofacial Multidisciplinary Team Appointment.家长对在参加颅面多学科团队会诊前收到患者信息手册的益处的认知。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Mar;62(3):527-533. doi: 10.1177/10556656231219579. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
10
A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies on the Impact of Empowerment-Based Interventions on Child and Parent Outcomes in the Pediatric Oncology Setting.基于赋权干预对儿科肿瘤环境中儿童和家长结局影响的实验研究的系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 1;16:3717-3735. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S436394. eCollection 2023.
以解决为导向的儿科康复指导:探究家庭的转变经历及结果
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(1):16-32. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2017.1379457. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
4
'It's important that we learn too': Empowering parents to facilitate participation in physical activity for children and youth with disabilities.“我们自己也要学习,这很重要”:增强家长能力,以促进残疾儿童和青少年参与体育活动。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Mar;26(2):135-148. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1378367. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
5
Shared Decision-Making and Children With Disabilities: Pathways to Consensus.共同决策与残疾儿童:达成共识的途径
Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0956.
6
A Qualitative Analysis of the Information Needs of Parents of Children with Cystic Fibrosis prior to First Admission.首次入院前囊性纤维化患儿家长信息需求的定性分析
J Pediatr Nurs. 2017 May-Jun;34:e29-e33. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
The Role of Online Social Support in Supporting and Educating Parents of Young Children With Special Health Care Needs in the United States: A Scoping Review.在线社会支持在美国为有特殊医疗需求幼儿的家长提供支持和教育方面的作用:一项范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 22;18(12):e333. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6722.
8
"Hope for the best, prepare for the worst": A qualitative interview study on parents' needs and fears in pediatric advance care planning.“抱最好的希望,做最坏的准备”:一项关于儿科预先医疗照护计划中父母需求和担忧的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):764-771. doi: 10.1177/0269216316679913. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
Parent Perceptions of Family Social Supports in Families With Children With Epilepsy.癫痫患儿家庭中父母对家庭社会支持的认知
J Neurosci Nurs. 2016 Dec;48(6):336-341. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000243.
10
Urban caregiver empowerment: Caregiver nativity, child-asthma symptoms, and emergency-department use.城市护理者赋权:护理者的出生地、儿童哮喘症状与急诊室就诊情况
Fam Syst Health. 2016 Sep;34(3):229-39. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000206.