Edmonds D, Greminger P, Locher R, Knorr M, Vetter H, Vetter W
J Hypertens Suppl. 1986 Dec;4(5):S406-9.
The aim of the present double-blind crossover study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of enalapril and atenolol in 48 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 2-week wash-out period, treatment was started with either enalapril 20 mg or atenolol 50 mg daily. In patients with a diastolic blood pressure value of more than 90 mmHg after 2 weeks of therapy, doses were doubled. After 4 weeks of therapy, cases were classified as responders (diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 95 mmHg) or non-responders (diastolic blood pressure greater than 95 mmHg) and after a 2-week wash-out phase switched over to the alternative drug for another 4-week therapy period. Both substances significantly lowered mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure to a comparable degree. After 2 weeks, 57% of patients under enalapril and 59% under atenolol shared a satisfactory response, which did not change at the higher dose levels. After 4 weeks of therapy the incidence of side effects was slightly, but insignificantly, higher on atenolol than on enalapril. Thus, our results show that both agents seem equally qualified as first-step drugs in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
本双盲交叉研究的目的是比较依那普利和阿替洛尔对48例轻至中度原发性高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性。经过2周的洗脱期后,开始每日服用20 mg依那普利或50 mg阿替洛尔进行治疗。治疗2周后舒张压值超过90 mmHg的患者,药物剂量加倍。治疗4周后,病例被分为反应者(舒张压小于或等于95 mmHg)或无反应者(舒张压大于95 mmHg),经过2周的洗脱期后,改用另一种药物再进行4周的治疗期。两种药物均能显著降低平均收缩压和舒张压,程度相当。2周后,服用依那普利的患者中有57%、服用阿替洛尔的患者中有59%有满意的反应,在较高剂量水平时这一比例未发生变化。治疗4周后,阿替洛尔的副作用发生率略高于依那普利,但无统计学意义。因此,我们的结果表明,在治疗轻至中度原发性高血压时,这两种药物作为一线用药似乎同样适用。