• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择合适的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。选择指南。

Choosing the right ACE inhibitor. A guide to selection.

作者信息

Leonetti G, Cuspidi C

机构信息

Istituto Scientifico Ospedale S. Luca, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):516-35. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00003.

DOI:10.2165/00003495-199549040-00003
PMID:7789286
Abstract

To find out if there are one or more criteria to guide selection among the ACE inhibitors for the treatment of arterial hypertension, we have reviewed the principal pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of the more frequently used agents of this class of antihypertensive drugs. Among the pharmacokinetic aspects that we have considered, terminal half-life, as related to the duration of the antihypertensive effect, and the route of elimination may have an impact in the clinical selection among the various ACE inhibitors. On the other hand, all the other characteristics have no pragmatic clinical relevance or may be corrected by dosage adjustment. Among the pharmacodynamic aspects, the antihypertensive efficacy of the different ACE inhibitors seems to be very similar, and some of the differences found in different studies are probably due to the population investigated and to the protocol of the study (time of blood pressure measurements, diet, drug dosage etc.). However, some differences can be found among the various ACE inhibitors when the antihypertensive efficacy is evaluated also as trough to peak ratio of blood pressure reduction. Indeed, in respect of the administration schedule of each ACE inhibitor not all the agents of this class have a trough to peak ratio above 50 to 60%, as suggested by the Food and Drug Administration of the US. According to this criterion, especially when blood pressure is measured with 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, some drugs such as lisinopril, enalapril and trandolapril should be preferred for their higher trough to peak ratios. Left ventricular hypertrophy is significantly reduced by antihypertensive agents, the ACE inhibitors being the most effective. Indeed, the reduction of left ventricle mass for each 1 mm Hg reduction in mean blood pressure is greater for ACE inhibitors than for other classes of antihypertensive agents. However, this effect seems more class related than characteristic of one or more among the various ACE inhibitors. Insulin resistance is elevated in hypertensive patients and it has been thought responsible for or associated with other metabolic abnormalities. ACE inhibitors seem to correct the insulin resistance of hypertensive patients, but this effect also appears to be class related more than limited to one ACE inhibitor or another. Our knowledge of this field is still limited and more studies are necessary, especially to understand the prognostic impact of insulin resistance and/or insulin resistance improvement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

为了确定是否存在一种或多种标准来指导在治疗动脉高血压时选择血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂,我们回顾了这类抗高血压药物中更常用药物的主要药代动力学和药效学方面的内容。在我们考虑的药代动力学方面,与降压作用持续时间相关的终末半衰期以及消除途径可能会对不同ACE抑制剂的临床选择产生影响。另一方面,所有其他特征在临床实践中并无实际意义,或者可以通过调整剂量来纠正。在药效学方面,不同ACE抑制剂的降压效果似乎非常相似,不同研究中发现的一些差异可能归因于所研究的人群以及研究方案(血压测量时间、饮食、药物剂量等)。然而,当将降压效果评估为血压降低的谷峰比时,不同ACE抑制剂之间会发现一些差异。实际上,就每种ACE抑制剂的给药方案而言,并非所有这类药物的谷峰比都高于美国食品药品监督管理局建议的50%至60%。根据这一标准,特别是在使用24小时无创动态血压监测测量血压时,赖诺普利、依那普利和群多普利等一些药物因其较高的谷峰比而更受青睐。抗高血压药物可显著减轻左心室肥厚,其中ACE抑制剂最为有效。事实上,平均血压每降低1毫米汞柱,ACE抑制剂使左心室质量的降低幅度大于其他类别的抗高血压药物。然而,这种效应似乎更多地与类别相关,而非不同ACE抑制剂中某一种或几种的特性。高血压患者存在胰岛素抵抗升高的情况,并且被认为与其他代谢异常有关或为之负责。ACE抑制剂似乎可以纠正高血压患者的胰岛素抵抗,但这种效应似乎也更多地与类别相关,而非局限于某一种ACE抑制剂。我们在这一领域的知识仍然有限,需要更多的研究,特别是要了解胰岛素抵抗和/或胰岛素抵抗改善的预后影响。(摘要截取自400字)

相似文献

1
Choosing the right ACE inhibitor. A guide to selection.选择合适的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。选择指南。
Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):516-35. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00003.
2
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and moderate hypertension.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与中度高血压
Drugs. 1990 Sep;40(3):326-45. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040030-00002.
3
Trough/peak ratios of once daily angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists.每日一次服用的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙拮抗剂的谷峰比值。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Jul;9(7):633-43. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00021-0.
4
Newer ACE inhibitors. A look at the future.新型血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。展望未来。
Drugs. 1990 Dec;40(6):800-28. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040060-00004.
5
Trandolapril. How does it differ from other angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors?
Drugs. 1993;46 Suppl 2:172-81; discussion 182. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199300462-00027.
6
Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in renal failure.血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂在肾衰竭患者中的临床药代动力学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993 Mar;24(3):230-54. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199324030-00005.
7
Fixed combination trandolapril/verapamil sustained-release: a review of its use in essential hypertension.固定复方制剂群多普利/维拉帕米缓释片:用于原发性高血压的综述
Drugs. 2002;62(17):2539-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262170-00014.
8
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockade in the treatment of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension.血管紧张素转换酶抑制和二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞在治疗动脉高血压左心室肥厚中的应用
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2002 Jun;50(3):169-74.
9
Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs: current status.肾脏保护与抗高血压药物:现状
Drugs. 1999 May;57(5):665-93. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957050-00002.
10
Trough:peak ratio of the blood pressure response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Nov;12(8):S91-4; discussion S94-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Lisinopril and Bisoprolol to Prevent Anthracycline Induced Cardiotoxicity in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients.培哚普利和比索洛尔预防局部晚期乳腺癌患者蒽环类药物诱导性心脏毒性的作用。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Sep 1;22(9):2847-2853. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.9.2847.
2
Efficacy and safety of twice- vs once-daily dosing of lisinopril for hypertension.赖诺普利每日两次与每日一次给药治疗高血压的疗效及安全性
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Sep;19(9):868-873. doi: 10.1111/jch.13011. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
The evolution of renin-angiotensin blockade: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as the starting point.

本文引用的文献

1
ON THE NATURE OF THE PRESSOR ACTION OF RENIN.肾素加压作用的本质。
J Exp Med. 1939 Oct 31;70(5):521-42. doi: 10.1084/jem.70.5.521.
2
THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM.肾素-血管紧张素系统
Pharmacol Rev. 1965 Jun;17:143-82.
3
Some metabolic aspects of essential hypertension and its treatment.原发性高血压及其治疗的一些代谢方面
肾素-血管紧张素阻断的演变:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂作为起点。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010 Apr;12(2):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s11906-010-0091-9.
4
Zofenopril versus Lisinopril in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension in Elderly Patients : A Randomised, Double-Blind, Multicentre Study.佐芬普利与赖诺普利治疗老年原发性高血压的随机、双盲、多中心研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2005;25(3):175-82. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200525030-00003.
5
Tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: are they more effective than serum angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors?组织血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:它们比血清血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂更有效吗?
Clin Cardiol. 2005 Dec;28(12):551-5. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960281203.
6
Building and evaluation of a structured representation of pharmacokinetics information presented in SPCs: from existing conceptual views of pharmacokinetics associated with natural language processing to object-oriented design.药品说明书中呈现的药代动力学信息结构化表示的构建与评估:从与自然语言处理相关的药代动力学现有概念视图到面向对象设计
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 May-Jun;10(3):271-80. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1193. Epub 2003 Jan 28.
7
Perindopril: an updated review of its use in hypertension.培哚普利:其在高血压治疗中应用的最新综述。
Drugs. 2001;61(6):867-96. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161060-00020.
8
Class effects and evidence-based medicine.类效应与循证医学。
Clin Cardiol. 2000 Jul;23(7 Suppl 4):IV15-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230705.
9
The drug market in four European countries.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 1:69-79. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814001-00010.
10
Should we aim at tissue renin-angiotensin systems?我们应该以组织肾素-血管紧张素系统为目标吗?
Pharm World Sci. 1998 Jun;20(3):93-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1008621913932.
Am J Med. 1993 Apr 23;94(4A):32S-39S.
4
Long-term effects of a converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker on urinary albumin excretion in patients with essential hypertension.一种转换酶抑制剂和一种钙通道阻滞剂对原发性高血压患者尿白蛋白排泄的长期影响。
Am J Hypertens. 1993 Feb;6(2):108-13. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.2.108.
5
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring use in hypertension research and clinical practice.动态血压监测在高血压研究及临床实践中的应用
Hypertension. 1993 Apr;21(4):510-24. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.21.4.510.
6
Fosinopril monotherapy: relationship between blood pressure reduction and time of administration.福辛普利单药治疗:血压降低与给药时间的关系。
Clin Cardiol. 1993 Apr;16(4):324-30. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960160407.
7
Quality of life and antihypertensive therapy in men. A comparison of captopril with enalapril. The Quality-of-Life Hypertension Study Group.男性的生活质量与抗高血压治疗。卡托普利与依那普利的比较。生活质量高血压研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):907-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281302.
8
Effect of antihypertensive therapy on the kidney in patients with diabetes: a meta-regression analysis.抗高血压治疗对糖尿病患者肾脏的影响:一项Meta回归分析。
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jan 15;118(2):129-38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-2-199301150-00009.
9
Effect of chronic treatment with enalapril on glucose tolerance and serum insulin in non-insulin-resistant Japanese patients with essential hypertension.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;45(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00315345.
10
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic chronic renal disease.
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Aug 9;153(15):1749-59. doi: 10.1001/archinte.153.15.1749.