Donato Henrique, Andrade Luísa, Bastati Nina, Cipriano Augusta, Ba-Ssalamah Ahmed, Caseiro-Alves Filipe
Imaging Department. Faculty of Medicine. University Centre Hospitals of Coimbra (CHUC). Coimbra, Portugal.
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy. Medical University of Vienna. General Hospital of Vienna (AKH). Vienna. Austria.
Acta Med Port. 2018 Sep 28;31(9):470-477. doi: 10.20344/amp.10259.
Multiacinar regenerative nodules are benign hepatocellular nodules related to vascular disturbances of the liver. They strongly resemble conventional focal nodular hyperplasia but are connected to different clinical settings, typically chronic liver disease. The purpose of the present study was to describe the key imaging features of these lesions and compare them with a control arm of focal nodular hyperplasia.
A blinded consensus review of liver magnetic resonance consisting of 26 cases of multiacinar regenerative nodules and 25 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia was performed. Lesion size, shape, margins, structure, T1 and T2 signal intensity, diffusion and contrast-enhanced features (including hepatobiliary phase), presence of a central scar and of a peripheral hypointense rim were compared between the two groups.
Significant differences between multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia included size (median 2.35 cm, IQR: 2.13, vs 6.00 cm, IQR: 5.20, respectively, p < 0.001), presence of a peripheral hypointense rim after contrast (n = 9 vs n = 2 cases, p = 0.038) and of a central scar (n = 9 vs n = 20, p = 0.002). There were no other significant differences.
Overall multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia have very similar imaging features but lack of a central scar and presence of a hypointense rim should suggest a diagnosis of multiacinar regenerative nodules.
Recognition of the imaging findings of multiacinar regenerative nodules can explain some atypical cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, avoiding unnecessary biopsies. They may also be the trigger to investigate an unsuspected underlying liver vascular abnormality.
多腺泡再生结节是与肝脏血管紊乱相关的良性肝细胞结节。它们与传统的局灶性结节性增生极为相似,但与不同的临床情况相关,通常为慢性肝病。本研究的目的是描述这些病变的关键影像学特征,并将其与局灶性结节性增生的对照组进行比较。
对26例多腺泡再生结节和25例局灶性结节性增生的肝脏磁共振成像进行了盲法一致性评估。比较了两组病变的大小、形状、边缘、结构、T1和T2信号强度、扩散及对比增强特征(包括肝胆期)、中央瘢痕及周边低信号环的存在情况。
多腺泡再生结节与局灶性结节性增生之间的显著差异包括大小(中位数分别为2.35 cm,四分位间距:2.13,对比6.00 cm,四分位间距:5.20,p < 0.001)、对比后周边低信号环的存在情况(9例对比2例,p = 0.038)以及中央瘢痕的存在情况(9例对比20例,p = 0.002)。无其他显著差异。
总体而言,多腺泡再生结节和局灶性结节性增生具有非常相似的影像学特征,但缺乏中央瘢痕及存在低信号环应提示多腺泡再生结节的诊断。
认识多腺泡再生结节的影像学表现可解释一些局灶性结节性增生的非典型病例,避免不必要的活检。它们也可能是调查未被怀疑的潜在肝脏血管异常的触发因素。