Zhang Chi, Gu Zhi-Chun, Shen Long, Pan Mang-Mang, Yan Yi-Dan, Pu Jun, Liu Xiao-Yan, Lin Hou-Wen
Department of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Oct 2;10:258. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00258. eCollection 2018.
The relationship between the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and the impairment of cognition in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unknown. A comprehensive database search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov Website was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting cognitive impairment events and observational nationwide database studies reporting adjusted hazard ratio (HR) in AF patients with NOACs. The primacy outcome was a composite of any cognitive impairment. Summary of HRs and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using the fixed- and random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were undertaken according to the individual NOACs, study types, and duration of follow-up. Finally, eight studies including 97,595 patients (77,643 patients in 6 RCTs and 19,952 patients in 2 observational database studies) met the inclusion criteria, among which 55,337 (56.7%) patients were receiving NOACs and 42,258 (43.3%) patients were receiving vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) or acetylsalicylic acid. The results showed a borderline significant association between the use of NOACs and the lower risk of cognitive impairment when compared with VKAs/ acetylsalicylic acid (HR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.63-0.98 for fixed-effects model; HR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.53-1.01 for random-effects model), with no significant heterogeneity between the studies ( = 39.4%, = 0.12). The results were consistent across the key subgroups ( > 0.05 for each). The results indicated that the use of NOACs might lower the tendency on the risk of cognitive impairment in comparison to VKAs/acetylsalicylic acid, and further RCTs and real-world studies are required on an urgent basis to obtain a robust result.
非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs)的使用与心房颤动(AF)患者认知功能损害之间的关系尚不清楚。我们对Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆数据库和ClinicalTrials.gov网站进行了全面的数据库检索,以查找报告认知障碍事件的随机对照试验(RCTs)以及报告接受NOACs治疗的AF患者调整后风险比(HR)的全国性观察数据库研究。主要结局是任何认知障碍的综合结果。使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型计算HRs和95%置信区间(95%CI)的汇总值。根据个体NOACs、研究类型和随访时间进行亚组分析。最后,八项研究(包括6项RCTs中的77,643例患者和2项观察性数据库研究中的19,952例患者)符合纳入标准,其中55,337例(56.7%)患者接受NOACs治疗,42,258例(43.3%)患者接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)或阿司匹林治疗。结果显示,与VKAs/阿司匹林相比,使用NOACs与较低的认知障碍风险之间存在临界显著关联(固定效应模型的HR:0.80,95%CI:0.63 - 0.98;随机效应模型的HR:0.77;95%CI:0.53 - 1.01),研究之间无显著异质性(I² = 39.4%,P = 0.12)。关键亚组的结果一致(每个亚组的P > 0.05)。结果表明,与VKAs/阿司匹林相比,使用NOACs可能会降低认知障碍风险的倾向,迫切需要进一步的RCTs和真实世界研究以获得可靠结果。