Suppr超能文献

静脉给药期间的中断:一项多中心观察性研究。

Interruptions during intravenous medication administration: A multicentre observational study.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2019 Mar;75(3):555-562. doi: 10.1111/jan.13880. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and cause of interruptions during intravenous medication administration, which factors are associated with interruptions and to what extent interruptions influence protocol compliance.

BACKGROUND

Hospital nurses are frequently interrupted during medication administration, which contributes to the occurrence of administration errors. Errors with intravenous medication are especially worrisome, given their immediate therapeutic effects. However, knowledge about the extent and type of interruptions during intravenous medication administration is limited.

DESIGN

Multicentre observational study.

METHODS

Data were collected during two national evaluation studies (2011 - 2012 & 2015 - 2016). Nurses were directly observed during intravenous medication administration. An interruption was defined as a situation where a break during the administration was needed or where a nurse was distracted but could process without a break. Interruptions were categorized according to source and cause. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the associations between explanatory variables and interruptions or complete protocol compliance.

RESULTS

In total, 2,526 intravenous medication administration processes were observed. During 291 (12%) observations, nurses were interrupted 321 times. Most interruptions were externally initiated by other nurses (19%) or patients (19%). Less interruptions occurred during the evening (odds ratio: 0.23 [95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.62]). Do-not-disturb vests were worn by 61 (2%) nurses. No significant association was found between being interrupted and complete protocol compliance.

CONCLUSION

An interruption occurred in every eight observed intravenous medication administration, mainly caused by other nurses or patients. One needs to consider critically which strategies effectively improve safety during the high-risk nursing-task of intravenous medication administration.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定静脉给药过程中中断的频率和原因,哪些因素与中断有关,以及中断在多大程度上影响方案依从性。

背景

医院护士在给药过程中经常被打断,这导致给药错误的发生。静脉用药错误尤其令人担忧,因为它们具有直接的治疗效果。然而,关于静脉给药过程中中断的程度和类型的知识有限。

设计

多中心观察性研究。

方法

数据收集于两项全国性评估研究(2011-2012 年和 2015-2016 年)期间。护士在静脉给药时直接观察。中断被定义为给药过程中需要中断或护士分心但无需中断即可处理的情况。中断根据来源和原因进行分类。采用多水平逻辑回归分析评估解释变量与中断或完全遵守方案之间的关系。

结果

共观察了 2526 次静脉给药过程。在 291 次(12%)观察中,护士被打断 321 次。大多数中断是由其他护士(19%)或患者(19%)外部发起的。夜间中断较少(比值比:0.23 [95%置信区间:0.08-0.62])。有 61 名(2%)护士佩戴了“请勿打扰”背心。被打断与完全遵守方案之间无显著关联。

结论

在观察到的每 8 次静脉给药中就有 1 次发生中断,主要由其他护士或患者引起。在高风险的静脉给药护理任务中,需要批判性地考虑哪些策略能有效提高安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验