L.A. Gard is project coordinator, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3723-8859. J. Peterson is senior clinical informationist, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6585-892X. C. Miller is clinical informationist, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9262-152X. N. Ghosh is a resident, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-9309. Q. Youmans is a resident, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5818-8091. A. Didwania is associate professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. S.D. Persell is associate professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. M. Jean-Jacques is assistant professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2897-4187. P. Ravenna is assistant professor, Division of Family and Community Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. M.J. O'Brien is assistant professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. M.S. Goel is associate professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-2400.
Acad Med. 2019 Jan;94(1):135-143. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002491.
Medical training has traditionally focused on the proximate determinants of disease, with little focus on how social conditions influence health. The authors conducted a scoping review of existing curricula to understand the current programs designed to teach primary care residents about the social determinants of health (SDH).
In January and March 2017, the authors searched seven databases. Eligible articles focused on primary care residents, described a curriculum related to SDH, were published between January 2007 and January 2017, and were based in the United States.
Of the initial 5,523 articles identified, 43 met study eligibility criteria. Most programs (29; 67%) were in internal medicine. Sixteen studies (37%) described the curriculum development process. Overall, 20 programs (47%) were short or one-time sessions, and 15 (35%) were longitudinal programs lasting at least 6 months. Thirty-two programs (74%) reported teaching SDH content using didactics, 22 (51%) incorporated experiential learning, and many programs (n = 38; 88%) employed both. Most studies reported satisfaction and/or self-perceived changes in knowledge or attitudes.
The authors identified wide variation in curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation. They highlight curricula that considered community and resident needs, used conceptual frameworks or engaged multiple stakeholders to select content, used multiple delivery methods, and focused evaluation on changes in skills or behaviors. This review highlights the need not only for systematic, standardized approaches to developing and delivering SDH curricula but also for developing rigorous evaluation of the curricula, particularly effects on resident behavior.
医学培训传统上侧重于疾病的直接决定因素,而很少关注社会条件如何影响健康。作者对现有的课程进行了范围界定审查,以了解旨在向初级保健住院医师教授健康的社会决定因素(SDH)的现有课程计划。
2017 年 1 月和 3 月,作者检索了七个数据库。符合条件的文章侧重于初级保健住院医师,描述了与 SDH 相关的课程,发表于 2007 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月之间,且以美国为基础。
最初确定的 5523 篇文章中,有 43 篇符合研究资格标准。大多数计划(29;67%)是在医学内科。有 16 项研究(37%)描述了课程开发过程。总体而言,20 个计划(47%)是短期或一次性课程,15 个(35%)是至少持续 6 个月的长期课程。32 个计划(74%)报告使用教学法教授 SDH 内容,22 个计划(51%)采用体验式学习,许多计划(n = 38;88%)同时采用这两种方法。大多数研究报告说对知识或态度的满意度和/或自我感知变化。
作者发现课程开发,实施和评估存在广泛差异。他们强调了那些考虑到社区和居民需求,使用概念框架或使多个利益相关者参与选择内容,使用多种交付方法以及专注于评估技能或行为变化的课程。该评论突出表明,不仅需要系统,标准化的方法来开发和提供 SDH 课程,而且还需要对课程进行严格评估,特别是对居民行为的影响。