Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Kaiser Permanente, Lafayette, Colorado; Division of Hematology Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS), Health Services Research & Development, Portland, Oregon; Oregon Health and Science University, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Portland, Oregon; VAPORHCS, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Portland, Oregon; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Feb;14(2):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
Patients with advanced lung cancer have a poor prognosis, but both chemotherapy and early palliative care (EPC) have been shown to improve survival and quality of life (QOL). The relationship between palliative care and receipt of chemotherapy receipt is understudied. We sought to determine if EPC is associated with chemotherapy receipt and intensity among patients with advanced stage lung cancer.
Retrospective cohort study of patients in the national Veterans Health Administration (VA) with stage IIIB or IV lung cancer diagnosed between January 2007- December 2013. EPC was defined as a specialist-delivered palliative care received within 90 days of cancer diagnosis. Outcomes included any chemotherapy receipt and high-intensity chemotherapy receipt defined as: i) more than 4 cycles of a platinum-based doublet, ii) ≥3 lines of chemotherapy, iii) Bevacizumab/Cetuximab triplet therapy, iv) Erlotinib use prior to 2011, and v) chemotherapy in the last days of life. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between EPC and chemotherapy receipt after adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics.
Among the entire cohort (N=23,566), 37% received EPC and 45% received any chemotherapy. Among those with EPC, 34% received chemotherapy compared to 51% among those without EPC (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.51-0.58). Patients who received EPC had reduced receipt of high-intensity chemotherapy including >4 cycles of platinum-based doublet (AOR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.60-0.77), ≥ 3 lines of chemotherapy (AOR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.53-0.71), triplet therapy (AOR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.56-0.82) and use of erlotinib prior to 2011 (AOR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79). Patients with EPC were more likely to receive chemotherapy in the last 14 (AOR=1.65, 95% CI: 1.44-1.87) and 30 days (AOR=1.67, 95% CI: 1.51-1.85) of life compared to those without EPC.
EPC was associated with reduced receipt of both any chemotherapy and high-intensity chemotherapy. However, receipt of chemotherapy at the very end-of-life was increased among patients with EPC compared to those without EPC. Among patients with advanced lung cancer, EPC may optimize patient selection for chemotherapy receipt leading to reduced use of high-intensity therapy by focusing on quality of life in accordance with patients' performance, preferences and goals of care.
晚期肺癌患者预后较差,但化疗和早期姑息治疗(EPC)都已被证明可以改善生存和生活质量(QOL)。姑息治疗与接受化疗之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。我们旨在确定 EPC 是否与晚期肺癌患者接受化疗和化疗强度有关。
这是一项对 2007 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间在退伍军人健康管理局(VA)中诊断为 IIIB 或 IV 期肺癌的患者进行的回顾性队列研究。EPC 的定义是在癌症诊断后 90 天内接受由专家提供的姑息治疗。结果包括任何化疗的接受情况和高强度化疗的接受情况,定义为:i)接受超过 4 个周期的基于铂的双联化疗,ii)接受 3 线以上的化疗,iii)贝伐珠单抗/西妥昔单抗三联治疗,iv)2011 年之前接受厄洛替尼治疗,v)在生命的最后几天接受化疗。使用逻辑回归来确定 EPC 与调整患者和肿瘤特征后接受化疗之间的关联。
在整个队列(N=23566)中,37%的患者接受了 EPC,45%的患者接受了任何化疗。在接受 EPC 的患者中,有 34%接受了化疗,而在未接受 EPC 的患者中,有 51%接受了化疗(调整后的优势比(AOR)=0.55,95%CI:0.51-0.58)。接受 EPC 的患者接受高强度化疗的比例降低,包括接受超过 4 个周期的基于铂的双联化疗(AOR=0.68,95%CI:0.60-0.77),接受 3 线以上的化疗(AOR=0.61,95%CI:0.53-0.71),接受三联治疗(AOR=0.68,95%CI:0.56-0.82)和在 2011 年之前接受厄洛替尼治疗(AOR=0.66,95%CI:0.55-0.79)。与未接受 EPC 的患者相比,接受 EPC 的患者在生命的最后 14 天(AOR=1.65,95%CI:1.44-1.87)和最后 30 天(AOR=1.67,95%CI:1.51-1.85)接受化疗的可能性更高。
EPC 与接受任何化疗和高强度化疗的比例降低有关。然而,与未接受 EPC 的患者相比,接受 EPC 的患者在生命的最后阶段接受化疗的比例增加。在晚期肺癌患者中,EPC 可能通过根据患者的表现、偏好和治疗目标,专注于生活质量,从而优化化疗接受的患者选择,从而减少高强度治疗的使用。