Sargin Murat, Tasdemir Muge Mete, Kuplay Huseyin, Erdogan Sevinc Bayer, Tandogar Nehir, Akansel Serdar, Kurc Erol, Orhan Gokcen, Aka Serap Aykut
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Phlebology. 2019 Jun;34(5):317-323. doi: 10.1177/0268355518806117. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
To evaluate the international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring patterns in patients with deep vein thrombosis.
Of 32,012 patients with ≥1 outpatient INR measurement and 42,582 patients with confirmed deep vein thrombosis diagnosis registered to our hospital between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013, 6720 records were identified to have both deep vein thrombosis and international normalized ratio measurement, and 4.377 out of 6.720 single patient records were determined to be statistically analyzable.
Median INR measurement frequency was 6.47 times/year and patients had INR levels of 2-3 in 34.3% of follow-up time. Having ≥70% vs. <70% of follow-up time within therapeutic range was associated with lower hospital admission frequency (9.7 vs. 10.3 times/year).
Our study revealed only one-third of the follow-up time to be spent within therapeutic INR, association of INR therapeutic range with lesser number of hospital admissions and INR monitoring frequency of 6.47 times/year despite lack of stable INR control in most of the deep vein thrombosis patients.
评估深静脉血栓形成患者的国际标准化比值(INR)监测模式。
在2010年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间登记到我院的32012例有≥1次门诊INR测量的患者和42582例确诊为深静脉血栓形成的患者中,确定6720份记录既有深静脉血栓形成又有INR测量,且6720份单患者记录中的4377份被确定可进行统计学分析。
INR测量的中位频率为每年6.47次,患者在34.3%的随访时间内INR水平为2 - 3。随访时间在治疗范围内≥70%与<70%相比,住院频率较低(分别为每年9.7次和10.3次)。
我们的研究显示,尽管大多数深静脉血栓形成患者缺乏稳定的INR控制,但只有三分之一的随访时间处于治疗性INR范围内,INR治疗范围与较少的住院次数相关,且INR监测频率为每年6.47次。