Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Oct;4(10):1308-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
This study sought to evaluate the relation between 12-lead ventricular tachycardia (VT) electrocardiography (ECG) and VT-related anatomical isthmuses (AIs) in repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF).
Slow-conducting AIs are the dominant VT substrate in rTOF. Whether an AI is considered critical relies on pace mapping (PM) guided by the VT ECG.
VT ECGs, electroanatomical mapping data and PM results were analyzed in 25 rTOF patients (group 1) (age 57 ± 13 years). Selection of PM and ablation sites was guided by VT ECG. In 7 patients (group 2) (age 33 ± 14 years), PM was systematically performed within all AIs, irrespective of the VT ECG.
In group 1, all 35 induced VTs (median VT cycle length 270 [interquartile range: 240 to 310] ms) were AI related. All 11 right bundle branch block (RBBB) VTs were related to AI3 (right ventricular septum if positive concordant [7 of 7]), coronary cusp if V2 transition break [3 of 4]). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) VTs with transition <V5 were mapped to AI3 (8 of 10) or AI2 (2 of 10) and LBBB VTs with transition ≥V5 to AI1 (8 of 14), AI3 (5 of 14), and AI4 (1 of 14). In group 2, all 8 induced VTs (median VT cycle length 240 [interquartile range: 230 to 268] ms) were AI related. All RBBB VTs were related to AI3 (right ventricular septum). For LBBB VTs, paced matches were obtained in AI3 and AI1. Activation mapping and/or ablation success confirmed AI3 to be critical for all 8 VTs.
In rTOF with only AI1 and AI3, RBBB VTs are due to clockwise and LBBB VTs to counterclockwise activation of AI3. Involvement of both AIs in the VT circuit limits the role of the 12-lead VT ECG and PM. AI3 can always be targeted irrespective of the 12-lead VT ECG.
本研究旨在评估修复性法洛四联症(rTOF)患者中 12 导联室性心动过速(VT)心电图(ECG)与 VT 相关解剖峡部(AI)之间的关系。
慢传导 AI 是 rTOF 中主要的 VT 底物。是否认为 AI 为关键部位取决于 VT ECG 引导的起搏标测(PM)。
对 25 例 rTOF 患者(组 1)[年龄 57 ± 13 岁]进行 VT ECG、电解剖标测数据和 PM 结果分析。根据 VT ECG 指导 PM 和消融部位的选择。在 7 例患者(组 2)[年龄 33 ± 14 岁]中,无论 VT ECG 如何,均在所有 AI 内系统地进行 PM。
在组 1 中,所有 35 种诱发 VT(中位 VT 周期长度 270 [四分位距:240 至 310] ms)均与 AI 相关。所有 11 种右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)VT 均与 AI3 相关(如果为正性融合波,则为右室间隔[7/7];如果 V2 导联过渡中断,则为冠状窦)。左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)VT 且过渡 <V5 时,标测到 AI3(10 例中的 8 例)或 AI2(10 例中的 2 例);LBBB VT 且过渡 ≥V5 时,标测到 AI1(14 例中的 8 例)、AI3(14 例中的 5 例)和 AI4(14 例中的 1 例)。在组 2 中,所有 8 种诱发 VT(中位 VT 周期长度 240 [四分位距:230 至 268] ms)均与 AI 相关。所有 RBBB VT 均与 AI3 相关(右室间隔)。对于 LBBB VT,在 AI3 和 AI1 中获得了起搏匹配。激活标测和/或消融成功证实 AI3 对所有 8 种 VT 均为关键部位。
在仅存在 AI1 和 AI3 的 rTOF 中,RBBB VT 是由于 AI3 的顺时针激活,而 LBBB VT 则是逆时针激活。VT 环路中两个 AI 的参与限制了 12 导联 VT ECG 和 PM 的作用。无论 12 导联 VT ECG 如何,均可始终针对 AI3 进行靶向治疗。