• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过医疗旅游改善全球卫生准入选择的循证政策。

An evidence-based policy for improving choice in global health access through medical travel.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA; Policy Research Group, University of Cambridge, UK.

Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2018 Dec;122(12):1372-1376. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.017
PMID:30337161
Abstract

Global medical travel has had an increasing trend without a comprehensive, evidence-driven policy to ensure safe and effective practice. To identify key factors that influence medical travel, we conducted a series of studies culminating with a preference and decision-making component of over 500 prospective medical travelers from a number of countries. Results indicated that quality of care was the most critical factor in the decision, followed by lower costs of procedure and shorter waiting times. Lower costs were less of a factor if the procedure was more invasive, which also increased the importance of waiting time in the decision. The most desired destinations for care were in Europe (United Kingdom, Germany) and North America (United States). Building on these insights and previous literature, we present a model that implements applications from these factors and additional insights generated across the series of studies toward an effective policy framework.

摘要

全球医疗旅游呈上升趋势,但缺乏全面、以证据为基础的政策来确保安全有效的实践。为了确定影响医疗旅游的关键因素,我们进行了一系列研究,最终对来自多个国家的 500 多名潜在医疗旅行者进行了偏好和决策分析。结果表明,医疗质量是决策的最关键因素,其次是手术费用较低和等待时间较短。如果手术更具侵入性,那么成本较低的因素就不那么重要,这也增加了等待时间在决策中的重要性。最受欢迎的医疗目的地是欧洲(英国、德国)和北美(美国)。基于这些见解和之前的文献,我们提出了一个模型,该模型将这些因素的应用以及整个系列研究中产生的其他见解应用于一个有效的政策框架中。

相似文献

1
An evidence-based policy for improving choice in global health access through medical travel.通过医疗旅游改善全球卫生准入选择的循证政策。
Health Policy. 2018 Dec;122(12):1372-1376. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
2
Evidence on global medical travel.关于全球医疗旅游的证据。
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Nov 1;93(11):785-9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.146027. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
3
Medical tourism today: what is the state of existing knowledge?今日医疗旅游:现有知识的现状如何?
J Public Health Policy. 2010 Jul;31(2):185-98. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2010.10.
4
Why do medical tourists travel to where they do? The role of networks in determining medical travel.为什么医疗游客会选择前往他们所去的地方?网络在决定医疗旅游中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
5
Factors influencing inbound medical travel to India.影响前往印度的医疗旅游的因素。
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Mar 28;33(2):155-172. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2018-0234. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
Role of Travel Motivations, Perceived Risks and Travel Constraints on Destination Image and Visit Intention in Medical Tourism: Theoretical model.旅行动机、感知风险和旅行限制在医疗旅游目的地形象及访问意愿中的作用:理论模型
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2017 Feb;17(1):e11-e17. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2016.17.01.003. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
An Integrative Review of Patients' Experience in the Medical Tourism.患者在医疗旅游中的体验的综合回顾
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020926762. doi: 10.1177/0046958020926762.
8
Global Health Policy and Access to Care: Investigating Patient Choice on an International Level Using Social Media.全球卫生政策与医疗可及性:利用社交媒体探究国际患者的选择
Front Public Health. 2016 Jan 25;3:284. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00284. eCollection 2015.
9
A unifying framework of the demand for transnational medical travel.跨国医疗旅游需求的统一框架。
Int J Health Serv. 2013;43(3):415-36. doi: 10.2190/HS.43.3.c.
10
A patient mobility framework that travels: European and United States-Mexican comparisons.患者移动性框架的跨国比较:欧洲与美墨对比。
Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographics and Trends for Inbound Medical Tourism in Germany for Orthopedic Patients before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.德国骨科患者入境医疗旅游的人口统计学和趋势:新冠疫情前和疫情期间的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021209.