Chai J Y, Liu J Z, Wang B, Qu J, Sun Z, Gao W H, Guo T H, Feng H L, Pan S X
Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Dental Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Oct 18;50(5):892-898.
To evaluate the deviation of digital implant surgical guides during fabrication process in the Organical Dental Implant (ODI) system.
This study included two parts. The first part was the in vitro study. A resin block with a diagnostic template was used for the planning. After cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, a surgical guide with eight implants was virtually designed using the ODI system. The guide was milled by a 5-axial numerical controlled milling machine, and an optical scanning was taken to digitalize the guide to a standard tessellation language (STL) form. The STL data were then imported into an ODI software and registered with the original design. The deviation of the sleeves between the design and the STL was measured in the ODI software and set as the golden standard. Then the ODI examination table was used to measure the deviation of the guide during fabrication. Examiners A and B measured 10 times separately. The reliability and the validity of the examination table was calculated. The second part was the in vivo study: The deviation during fabrication of 12 guides designed and fabricated by the ODI system were measured using the examination table.
The standard deviation of the deviation measured using the examination table by examiners A and B were all below 0.40 mm (for the shell reference points) and 0.71 degree (for the angles). No significant difference was found between the two examiners for any implant sites. The result of the examination table was larger than that of the software for the shell reference point (t-test, P<0.05), but no significant difference was found for the angle deviation (t-test, P>0.05). The 45 implants positions in the 12 guides for the in vivo study were examined using the examination table. The deviations at the shell reference points were (1.06±0.29) mm (0.42-1.75 mm), and at the implant tip were (1.12±0.48) mm (0.41-2.44 mm). The angle deviations were (1.42±0.70) degree (0.29-2.96 degree).
Deviation is unavoidable during the fabrication process of the guides. The examination table of the ODI system is a reliable and valid tool to measure the deviation during fabrication of the ODI guides. More studies should be designed to research the relationship between the fabrication deviation and the implant insertion deviation.
评估有机牙科种植(ODI)系统中数字化种植外科导板在制作过程中的偏差。
本研究包括两部分。第一部分为体外研究。使用带有诊断模板的树脂块进行规划。在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描后,使用ODI系统虚拟设计一个带有八颗种植体的外科导板。该导板由五轴数控铣床铣削而成,并进行光学扫描以将导板数字化为标准镶嵌语言(STL)格式。然后将STL数据导入ODI软件并与原始设计进行配准。在ODI软件中测量设计与STL之间套筒的偏差,并将其设定为金标准。然后使用ODI检查表测量制作过程中导板的偏差。检查者A和B分别测量10次。计算检查表的可靠性和有效性。第二部分为体内研究:使用检查表测量由ODI系统设计和制作的12个导板在制作过程中的偏差。
检查者A和B使用检查表测量的偏差标准差在壳参考点处均低于0.40mm,在角度处均低于0.71度。对于任何种植位点,两位检查者之间均未发现显著差异。检查表测量壳参考点的结果大于软件测量结果(t检验,P<0.05),但在角度偏差方面未发现显著差异(t检验,P>0.05)。使用检查表检查了体内研究中12个导板的45个种植体位置。壳参考点处的偏差为(1.06±0.29)mm(0.42 - 1.75mm),种植体尖端处的偏差为(1.12±0.48)mm(0.41 - 2.44mm)。角度偏差为(1.42±0.70)度(0.29 - 2.96度)。
在导板制作过程中偏差不可避免。ODI系统的检查表是测量ODI导板制作过程中偏差的可靠且有效的工具。应设计更多研究来探究制作偏差与种植体植入偏差之间的关系。